"The Exodus Revealed" Video II

NO, you in particular could not.

quote:

---

Asgara, science includes lab, but has much more to it than lab. This's just not true that there's no science in Moller's book, exploration and research. C'mon, please get real and be reasonable. Imo the extremity of your bias is showing here. I can do science at my home, for cryin out loud and don't need a degree to do it.

---

Science is following the scientific method. Collecting material is not science. How you collect material may be, but again, only if you follow the established methods. So, yes, there is very little if any verifiable science in his book.

Whata heck is the big rush to close this thread about? Jim's only one of us. We got our other one cropped and now there's this apparant desire to shut this one down. Why? Why don't you treat it like other threads and let it die off itself as traffic wanes?

Following whose established method? There are many, depending on what you are studying, where you are, what you have to work with and so forth. Get your dictionary out and argue with it. Mine says science is "knowledge derived from observation, study, and experimentation carried on in order to determine the nature or principles of what is being studied." According to this definition, experimentation or lab is just as I said, only one aspect of science.Btw, have you read the book?

BuzSlight of hand and misdirection once again.Let's stick to what you folk call evidence. Pick one of the items and try to show us why it should be considered.I've been trying to get one of the supporters to discuss the rock paintings. Would you feel like you could defend those or is there one of the other subjects you believe is defensible?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

quote:

---

We find a Mt. Sinai in Saudi Arabia where the entire top is burned black, and ALL the items mentioned in the biblical account are around that mountain. But you say "there's not one single item" there.

---

I am sorry, I believe you’re overstating the case now. What do you have to show anyone that the entire top is burned black of the mountain?

I had a "fatal error" on my screen when I posted my last post and thought I lost it. I redid it but see the other one took, so editing out post here.This message has been edited by buzsaw, 08-08-2004 11:11 PM

I wondered when our brilliant prof would show up to contribute his expertise in sarcasm. I knew it was about that time. Hi, prof. I think I heard you mother calling again.

I never knew my mother (or father for that matter.)

Gotta run for now. Up til 2 a.m posting this a m and can't do that every night and work next day.

quote:

---

So why don't you just buy the book ?

---

Waiting for the video maybe?

OK bud. Sorry. I'll not alude to that again.This message has been edited by buzsaw, 08-08-2004 11:33 PM

My father was killed in an industrial accident in 1963, 8 months before I was born - my mother was killed in an auto accident when she was 8 months pregnant with me - I was born by emergency caeserean. No brothers, no sisters no nothing. Never really missed it because I never knew anything different.

Thanks for sharing that, Eta. (gulp) Peace, and have a good night.

quote:

---

1. Yours is obviously preformed and/or eroded. Ours is obviously a one time solid boulder split down the middle.
2. Yours and none other in the world have the corroborating evidence to make it significant for the purpose of this thread topic.
3. Ours has obvious waterflow evidence as in the Biblical record which your doesn't have.

---

Waterflow evidence is not unique to boulders split in twain. I suspect you’re not taking into account water freezing and refreezing. Water seeps into a rock, freezes, swells, and enlarges the crack. The process repeats enough and the rock eventually splits. As each freeze melts, you get exactly the type of markings you point to as being unique.This message has been edited by Trae, 08-09-2004 04:56 AM