|
Author
|
Topic: "The Exodus Revealed" Video II
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
Message 488 of 603 (133268)
08-12-2004 2:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 486 by PaulK
08-12-2004 2:02 PM
|
|
Re: E v i d e n c e .
Now this is straightforward - just a simple name. If you can supply it - I'll be happy to look further into the author's work.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 486 by PaulK, posted 08-12-2004 2:02 PM | | PaulK has not replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 489 of 603 (133269)
08-12-2004 2:07 PM
|
Reply to: Message 487 by ramoss
08-12-2004 2:06 PM
|
|
Re: Evidence (or lack there of)
Can anybody point me to a peer reviewed scientific article by Ron Wyatt The rest of the statement is not really needed. There are none on nothing.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 487 by ramoss, posted 08-12-2004 2:06 PM | | ramoss has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 502 by ramoss, posted 08-12-2004 2:44 PM | | CK has not replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 492 of 603 (133275)
08-12-2004 2:11 PM
|
Reply to: Message 491 by Hydarnes
08-12-2004 2:10 PM
|
|
Re: E v i d e n c e .
have you got the name of that expert for us?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 491 by Hydarnes, posted 08-12-2004 2:10 PM | | Hydarnes has replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 494 of 603 (133278)
08-12-2004 2:18 PM
|
Reply to: Message 493 by Hydarnes
08-12-2004 2:15 PM
|
|
Re: E v i d e n c e .
The ones mentioned in 484 and 486 and by you:
The Saudi Archaeologists know MORE THAN YOU CHARLES! I might also remind you that the Saudi Archaeologist that investigated this area stated CLEARLY that "these are DISTINCTLY Egyptian and these engraving exist no other place in Saudi Arabia"--yes, that is just what they said. So can we have some names? Can you state CLEARLY who those people are? This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 01:19 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 01:20 PM
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 493 by Hydarnes, posted 08-12-2004 2:15 PM | | Hydarnes has replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 496 of 603 (133281)
08-12-2004 2:22 PM
|
|
|
My apologies - I get the sockpuppets mixed up  So this is to either of you - what's the name?
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 499 of 603 (133286)
08-12-2004 2:27 PM
|
|
|
it is in post 475 the validity of some evidence is alleged to be supported by some experts , we would like to know who they were.
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
Unfortunately, the name of this archaeologist was not given. So you will withdraw that claim until you can support it?
Also, read what 4 doctors and some authors have to say about Jebel Al Lawz and Mt. Sinai" on PAX Television: sigh... remember how we discussed DVD and videos? How they are not evidence? Now apply this concept to a TV show..... This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 02:14 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 02:15 PM
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 510 of 603 (133324)
08-12-2004 4:38 PM
|
Reply to: Message 509 by nator
08-12-2004 4:27 PM
|
|
Re: You've got him Buzz
Is it just me who is getting a sense of Deja-Vu ? Some experts without names? A T.V. show offered as evidence? Is time going backwards?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 509 by nator, posted 08-12-2004 4:27 PM | | nator has not replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 513 of 603 (133335)
08-12-2004 5:13 PM
|
Reply to: Message 512 by jar
08-12-2004 4:59 PM
|
|
Re: E v i d e n c e .
so let's see if we get this right: some coral that resembles some wheels - no tests performed (various reasons given Muslims hate jews etc..). An actual wheel that was taken for examination but was lost and an examinator who does not seem to have made any written notes. In addition, none of the team seem to have taken any photos of the wheel. A "burnt" mountain top that is "burnt" depending on your photos and the angle that you took the pictures from (Geological records?) A split rock - difference from a normal rock in some way we can't seem to define. Some rock drawings that tell a different picture if you take a picture of the whole rock. Various "expert" statements by people we can't seem to name.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 512 by jar, posted 08-12-2004 4:59 PM | | jar has not replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 516 of 603 (133342)
08-12-2004 5:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 514 by PaulK
08-12-2004 5:18 PM
|
|
Re: You've got him Buzz
hi paul - sorry I should have made it clear I was refering to the experts in 475. IT IS NOW I HAVE EDITED IT PAUL! This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 04:41 PM
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 514 by PaulK, posted 08-12-2004 5:18 PM | | PaulK has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 517 by PaulK, posted 08-12-2004 5:40 PM | | CK has not replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 520 of 603 (133381)
08-12-2004 8:04 PM
|
Reply to: Message 519 by lfen
08-12-2004 6:45 PM
|
|
Re: TO Admin.
All I've seen is stall tactics. I think we've seen everything we are going to see.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 519 by lfen, posted 08-12-2004 6:45 PM | | lfen has not replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
Put up or shut up
No I will not. Because I believe Ron Wyatt, and I know he was an honest man. I don't play by your rules. My rules? unless I am much mistaken it's the rule of this forum, you make a big assumption you need to back it with something. Do you think "Ron was honest" is a particuarly good answer? you also try to use those "experts" in an appeal to authority to silence both jar (post 475):
They know more about their country than YOU! So who should I trust? You who is looking at pictures? or the Saudi Archaeologists who clearly said this? And myself with post 478: Enough nitpicking. The Saudi Archaeologists know MORE THAN YOU CHARLES! The rules of this forum are clear: Make your points by providing supporting evidence and/or argument. Avoid bare assertions. Because it is often not possible to tell which points will prove controversial, it is acceptable to wait until a point is challenged before supporting it. I am making that challenge - provide names or withdraw the claim. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 07:49 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 07:51 PM
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
Re: E v i d e n c e .
A matter of fact, some of these wheels were tested by credentialed scientist. bis name is Dr. Lennart Moller from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm Sweden. Right and his area of expertise is?
He specializes in studying coral structures and is able to identify whether they were once a chariot wheel. Can he?
Watch is sketches on the video clip---you will see they are truly amazing. Amazing in what sense? Amazing sketches? That is all they all - drawings on a video - they provide nothing.
Also, the "table like structure" is clearly an axel with 2 chariot wheels on either end. Many of these objects that he analyzed under the water tested positive with a metal detector. He is a qualified scientist, whether you want to accept it or not. Em.. as far as I am aware a metal detector detects the presence of metal - that's it.
And even if another qualified archaeologist came in Now THIS is a nice dodge. Dr. Moller is a qualified archaelogist? if not who is the previous one mentioned in this passage? This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 07:58 PM
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
|
|
Message 526 of 603 (133396)
08-12-2004 9:01 PM
|
Reply to: Message 524 by jar
08-12-2004 8:53 PM
|
|
Re: E v i d e n c e .
I have to side with Jar on this - where are we going? We have assumption built on assumption, evidence is always "coming soon" but never arrives. Are we going to wait till part 6 or 7 before we call a halt to this. How about the next one in this series HAS to start with a list of evidence and the experts involved - otherwise it's a no-go.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 524 by jar, posted 08-12-2004 8:53 PM | | jar has not replied |
|
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: 07-04-2004
|
Re: E v i d e n c e .
OK - it's quite clear what is occuring here - they have no evidence -none is forth-coming. They are just waiting till we get sick of asking and give up - they will then claim to have answered all our questions. How is any debate intended to occur when they refuse to either supply the names of people supporting their evidence or withdrawn such claims.
|
™ Version 4.2