"The Exodus Revealed" Video II

And I would like an answer to 523.Support or withdraw.

Because i am a university researcher and I have (electronic) access to the journals/journal abstrasts databases? There is nothing by the good dr. either published or "in press" in any journal I can access. Not in the slightest - that is not the peer-review process in any way shape or form. Something has to be published in an academic journal before it can be peer-reviewed - it does not occur on the tv or the radio. Have I heard one good credentialed scientist dispute his book yet? Not that I'm aware of. I'm sure there has been though.Because science is done via the journals not via a chat or a TC show.I don't mean to be rude but such comment show you are clearly not familar with the peer review process at all.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 08:58 PM

and I still want an answer to 523.

come on - what is this, yahoo groups? Are we really saying that it's ok to cite experts, not give their identities and then use the following as a defense. What are the purpose of the rules of debate given here? they don't seem to serve any purpose at all.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 09:13 PM

What is there really left to say?How do we conduct a debate with someone who makes such claims?Let's get this straight - how do you know WHAT this person said? Is it a conversation with you? or is it what Ron relates on a book or in a website? So the guy was just wandering around and then disappeared back into the night? how do you even know he was an archaelogist, he could have been a taxi driver - maybe he was one of the people who stole the other wheel?Are you really claiming that you get someone to examine evidence but don't ask his name?I have seen some feeble evidence in my time but trying to cite a prof with no name takes the biscuit!This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 09:26 PMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 09:31 PM

how about you prove something?Do you really still claim that your evidence is scientific ? Experts who don't have names? Evidence that has disappeared into the night?How far are we going to take this?Ron Wyatt is a fraud, an out and out liar.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-13-2004 04:27 AM

I think this is the best creationist quote ever

do all 3!I have to head over to the office so I check in later and see how you can feeling.

Is it just me who hears the fat lady singing?

http://EvC Forum: Information -->EvC Forum: InformationGosh - looks like some is trying to muddy the water by bring in the ark....What a cheap trick - he's trying to run a debate on his own, he knows that none of us can reply in there!This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-13-2004 10:48 AM

what a rogue you are - what a cheap trick, replying to Brian's point in the proposed topics forum where he can't reply.Some of you so-called christians really have no shame and little in the way of moral.

Nice try - if you want to talk about the arc, get a topic approved and we will discuss it.

that's is your response - .It's seem to becoming harder and harder for you to keep your temper - is it the effect of cold reality on your pet "idea"?

well what's left for them? Their exodus video had been exposed as a sham, they have invisible experts they can't name.They are reduced to rants here and in the proposed topics forum - it's quite sad really. That quote again in full: This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-13-2004 11:01 AM

What we are now seeing is the general creationist "last ditch" tactic - they are trying to get us to insult them so that they can claim some form of bullying.Can I suggest that we stick to what has served us so well so far - the total lack of evidence in their case.Please don't be drawn down to their level.