|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: "The Exodus Revealed" Video II | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
And I would like an answer to 523.
Support or withdraw.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
But how do you know he hasn't put it up for peer review? Because i am a university researcher and I have (electronic) access to the journals/journal abstrasts databases? There is nothing by the good dr. either published or "in press" in any journal I can access.
Implying that it is open for interpretation is allowing peer review. Not in the slightest - that is not the peer-review process in any way shape or form. Something has to be published in an academic journal before it can be peer-reviewed - it does not occur on the tv or the radio. Have I heard one good credentialed scientist dispute his book yet? Not that I'm aware of. I'm sure there has been though. Because science is done via the journals not via a chat or a TC show. I don't mean to be rude but such comment show you are clearly not familar with the peer review process at all. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 08:58 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
and I still want an answer to 523.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Perhaps the archaeologist would not reveal his name for identity purposes? However, he did reveal he was one from Riyadh University, and I feel that is good enough. There is nothing wrong with claiming an archaeologist said something--even if he does not reveal his name. come on - what is this, yahoo groups? Are we really saying that it's ok to cite experts, not give their identities and then use the following as a defense. What are the purpose of the rules of debate given here? they don't seem to serve any purpose at all. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 09:13 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
What is there really left to say?
How do we conduct a debate with someone who makes such claims? Let's get this straight - how do you know WHAT this person said? Is it a conversation with you? or is it what Ron relates on a book or in a website?
and an archaeologist came along and supported your claim. But then he dissapears before he reveals his name So the guy was just wandering around and then disappeared back into the night? how do you even know he was an archaelogist, he could have been a taxi driver - maybe he was one of the people who stole the other wheel? Are you really claiming that you get someone to examine evidence but don't ask his name? I have seen some feeble evidence in my time but trying to cite a prof with no name takes the biscuit! This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 09:26 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-12-2004 09:31 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
how about you prove something?
Do you really still claim that your evidence is scientific ? Experts who don't have names? Evidence that has disappeared into the night? How far are we going to take this? Ron Wyatt is a fraud, an out and out liar. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-13-2004 04:27 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
I think this is the best creationist quote ever
Perhaps the archaeologist would not reveal his name for identity purposes? However, he did reveal he was one from Riyadh University, and I feel that is good enough. There is nothing wrong with claiming an archaeologist said something--even if he does not reveal his name.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
do all 3!
I have to head over to the office so I check in later and see how you can feeling.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Is it just me who hears the fat lady singing?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
http://EvC Forum: Information -->EvC Forum: Information
Gosh - looks like some is trying to muddy the water by bring in the ark.... What a cheap trick - he's trying to run a debate on his own, he knows that none of us can reply in there! This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-13-2004 10:48 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
what a rogue you are - what a cheap trick, replying to Brian's point in the proposed topics forum where he can't reply.
Some of you so-called christians really have no shame and little in the way of moral.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
That is in response to your vacuous claim that no lab tests have been done on Wyatt's discoveries, Nice try - if you want to talk about the arc, get a topic approved and we will discuss it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
that's is your response -
shove it . It's seem to becoming harder and harder for you to keep your temper - is it the effect of cold reality on your pet "idea"?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
well what's left for them? Their exodus video had been exposed as a sham, they have invisible experts they can't name.
They are reduced to rants here and in the proposed topics forum - it's quite sad really. That quote again in full:
Perhaps the archaeologist would not reveal his name for identity purposes? However, he did reveal he was one from Riyadh University, and I feel that is good enough. There is nothing wrong with claiming an archaeologist said something--even if he does not reveal his name. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-13-2004 11:01 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
What we are now seeing is the general creationist "last ditch" tactic - they are trying to get us to insult them so that they can claim some form of bullying.
Can I suggest that we stick to what has served us so well so far - the total lack of evidence in their case. Please don't be drawn down to their level.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024