|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolutionary superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Teen4Christ.
Actually, the thought of a state sponsored internet access in certain insane asylums to stimulate certain communication skills did cross my mind for a few seconds. This shows real imagination. Like I said, a bright future. Why don't you try some more? Btw, any body, what does the troll reference mean? Really, I'm startin to feel like an ignernt hillbilly here. " When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
This brought to mind a recent news story about a coroner in Toronto who presented "expert" testimony at many trials. His testimony led directly to the conviction of several individuals.
There must be thousands of defense lawyers who wish judges and juries believed as you do. Think of all money the government can save if they don't bother with forensic investigations. He is now admitting that he lacked any of the proper training and education to be an "expert". It's made a bit of a mess. Does it not cause you to wonder who you can trust? " When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Ah, yes, thank you.
In internet term, it is someone that intentionally post messages that are volatile in nature to attain strong reactions from members within the internet community. Basically, it's someone that gets a kick out of driving people crazy. Seems I've stumbled into their natural habitat. Are these critters dangerous? " When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Sorry,
I missed this.So, are you going to answer the question or continue to give smartass, posturing responses Honestly nator, I thought I did answer. No smartass remarks from me in this post. I promise. You asked
How do you know he has learned something? And I answered Do you have enough knowledge of conformation, breeding, nutrition, training, riding, competing etc. to be able to compare his knowledge and mine?
Well,here Larni offers up kind of a repeatable experiment so to speak. I then quoted Larni
I grew up with them and have many years of experience with crazy skittish beasts and then I said
One repeated by me. And
Anyone that spends time with horses is likely to describe them as just that, skittish. I was speakin the way a plain folk might. Well, this plain folk anyway. Seein as how I as well have spent a day or two around horses I was able to confirm his statement with my personal experience. Thats how I knew he had "some " experience. So anyway, you asked
You do realize that the person jumping the horse in my avatar photo is me, right? And when I answered
Well, now I do. I was "accepting your credentials" so to speak
How do you know if Larni has learned anything about horses, and do you have the expertise to test our comparative knowledge? As I said before, I thought I had already conceded that point to you. If yes, then let's go. If no, then stop wasting my time and percy's bandwidth Sorry Uh, Nator. Just one more thing.
posturing responses that are nearly devoid of content? I contend that rather than being devoid of content my posts may in fact contain uncomfortable content.Nator, really, did you read the OP? Without that quote this thread would not exist. You are my muse. Get used to it. " When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Thats just mean!
" When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Let me know when you are interested in discussing things thoughtfully and seriously. This has always been the case. Why don't we try to start over. Now I admit that commin out of the gate I may not have been all kind and gentle so I'll try and to soften it up a bit. The thing is, it just ain't a soft question that I ask. If you recall, when we first met, You were discussing with Riverrat the fact that you have difficulty understanding him. You were contending that due to the fact that you had some education in the area of reading comprehension The problem must be that he didn't write clearly. Sound true so far? See, I have not had any trouble understanding Riverrat. I surely do not agree with everything he has to say, but understanding just ain't an issue. Now, I have no formal education so...... Is it possible, even a little, that you don't really care to understand Riverrat, or even me for that matter. " When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Molbiogirl
In internet term, it is someone that intentionally post messages that are volatile in nature to attain strong reactions from members within the internet community. Basically, it's someone that gets a kick out of driving people crazy. Based on Teen4Christ's definition, it seems that you, in fact, are a troll. " When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Taz, sorry. I missed this with all that shoutin goin on.
To Hill Billy, how is what Paul wrote any different from "STHU in church" aside from the wordings? Teen4Christ says.
I don't see anything there that would drastically change the fact that women are not allowed to speak in church and that it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in church. So I proceeded to explain.
Now when a person can't see stuff it can help to take a step back. So, Am I being clear? Or look closer. For example, when I read the above statement I see that we are exactly two words away from agreement. Two. If you will indulge me I will slightly alter your statement and make it (in my opinion) perfectly agreeable.
I don't see anything there that would drastically change the fact that women were not allowed to speak in church and that it was disgraceful for a woman to speak in church. There, now we're gettin somewhere. Look at this, They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission,More closely. as the Law says. Now,as far as I know,there ain't no law round these parts that says anything at all about womenfolk speakin in church. So to me, that passage says, specifically, that women can in fact speak in church provided it is legal to do so. So you be carefull out there and don't you be lettin that big city education make you feel better than other folks. Teen4Christ, Ican't. Any comments? " When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V. "Just cause what I say pisses you off does not mean that I said it just to piss you off." Me
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
I think it is perfectly clear. Paul was talking about speaking in tongues and prophesying. I get this. I understand your thinking. So, that's three different opinions of exactly what that scripture says. Taz thinks it means STHU in church. You think speaking in tongues is the issue at hand. (which I never thought of by the way.) Then I think it's a legal issue.... Ain't no law. Funny Now here's something else I found interesting. The passage is not just about speakin in tongues and such, so much as it is about what other folks think about what your sayin and doin. Isn't it? Which, as anyone who is followin along would see, is what this thread is about. By the way, I'm no troll. It's just that there's some folks here that I would like to come to some sort of agreement with. An understanding, if you will. Now you might think I have a strange way of goin about it, tryin to get an agreement that is, and I'm sure you'd be right, but I don't want folks thinkin that just cause I wanna agree means I'm gonna swallow any bull. If you know what I mean. " When hunting the obtuse subtlety makes excellent bait." Jimmy V. "Just cause what I say pisses you off does not mean that I said it just to piss you off." Me
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Well, the moral seems to be that actual experts who do have the proper training and education are superior in expertise to people who aren't and who don't. Yes, I suppose. It seems that judges and juries believed this fellow had " expertise." I believe I read somewhere that your field is mathematics. Hope I got that right. Now, you know exactly what qualifications you possess, thats clear, but how do I. Know that is. My question is: How do YOU know who to trust? Cause, don't forget what Nator said: The only thing any of us have to go on here is what we read, you know. "Just cause what I say pisses you off does not mean that I said it just to piss you off." Me " Who the *$%* is Jimmy V ?" Some drunk guy in a bar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
I didn't realize that the stereotypical hillbilly frequented science-themed internet debate boards. I'm not surprised. I fact I wonder if you know anything about any of the people you so gratuitously apply stereotypes to. For example, were you aware of the generations old hillbilly tradition of troll hunting? "Just cause what I say pisses you off does not mean that I said it just to piss you off." Me " Who the *$%* is Jimmy V ?" Some drunk guy in a bar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Due to the recent implementation of the governments catch and release policy regarding
trolls there has been an explosion in the troll population in this area. To aid you in a safe and rewarding internet experience Hill Billy Publications is pleased to bring you, The quik reference
TROLL IDENTIFICATION GUIDE (Abridged.) In this region the most common troll varieties are :
Trollus assholeus interuptus.
Commonly know as the Tazmainian troll this varmit can regularly be seen Randomly flailingfrom one topic to another, arms and legs akimbo, causein quite a ruckus. Although frightening in appearance this troll is harmless, as it has no teeth. If you encounter a tazmainain troll, just confront it and it will run away and hide, leaving only a foul aroma and a slight sense of bewilderment. Trollus scientificus assholeus. Also known as the snarky troll, this may be the most intelligent and dangerous variety.Masters of intimidation and camouflage they are often seen cloaked in scientific degrees. Using their vast knowledge of a very narrow field to distract their prey, they convince the unwitting participant that this actually means something. To determine if you are encountering a snarky troll merely ask a question. If the word "snark" appears in the answer, you have. Call it by name and, you guessed it, it runs away. Trollus domesticus. Often mistaken as a sad and lonely person the domestic troll may seem quite harmlessbut this troll must be approached with extreme caution for it is the keeper of the troll dinner bell. For a demonstration of the troll dinner bell and an actual, live troll feeding frenzyclik here. http://EvC Forum: Anyone else notice this pattern? -->EvC Forum: Anyone else notice this pattern?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
the answer is : because they don't actually feel valuable as human beings alone. They need a label that lifts them high enough to look down on someone else to make them feel better about themselves. Ka Ching! We have a winner! "Just cause what I say pisses you off does not mean that I said it just to piss you off." Me " Who the *$%* is Jimmy V ?" Some drunk guy in a bar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
There is a certain individual who frequents these boards who uses what I'm pretty sure is a REGISTERED TRADEMARK on his avatar.
( Taz? ) Now, unless this individual is in possession of a license to use this trademark he is in direct violation of the LAW. (I think the host may be as well.) Now that is TWO examples of this type of behavior from this individual in one week. Does this not indicate that this individual feels, ABOVE the LAW, THEREFORE, superior ? No? "Just cause what I say pisses you off does not mean that I said it just to piss you off." Me
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hill Billy Member (Idle past 5385 days) Posts: 163 From: The hills Joined: |
Within the next 12 hours please supply at least 3 examples of posts of yours that have contributed to a discussion in a meaningful way. I would be happy to, but before I do, it might be wise for me to find out exactly what "meaningful" means to you. See, I'd suspect that plenty of folks here find what I have to say quite meaningful. I don't deny that many folks here will not LIKE what I have to say. That would seem to include yourself. The point I'm making, ( quite clearly I thought,) is that: For effective communication to occur there must be an interest in communicating. If all you got is a bunch of folks shoutin at each other you ain't gonna get much done. Now some may contend that I'm the one doin all the shoutin and to them I'd say: Please go back and read it all again, dispassionately. PLEASE! Seems I've only got 12 hours! "Just cause what I say pisses you off does not mean that I said it just to piss you off." Me
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024