Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did Jesus die in vain?
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 40 of 151 (454248)
02-06-2008 5:01 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by CK
02-06-2008 4:54 AM


[qs]As you are a self proclaimed atheist I wonder why you joined this topic?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because this is in "free for all" not faith and belief and because I didn't see a disclaimer that said "christians only". You asked a question, I provided an answer.[qs] OK As a self proclaimed atheist I wonger why you were interested in the topic? A genuine question.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by CK, posted 02-06-2008 4:54 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by CK, posted 02-06-2008 5:18 AM pelican has not replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 52 of 151 (454368)
02-06-2008 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by nator
02-06-2008 8:58 AM


Well, I would agree that the teachings of Jesus, even if he was a purely fictional construct, are as good as most any others'. "Be good to one another, take care of the poor, etc."
Mostly, I think the benefit is felt mostly by those who believe they are "saved" or "born again", becasue they can believe themselves special and part of an elite group that will enjoy bliss in heaven rather than eternal torment in hell.
Well, even his teachings aren't followed, and heaven and hell are not of this world so does Jesus only help the born again in this world?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by nator, posted 02-06-2008 8:58 AM nator has not replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 55 of 151 (454585)
02-07-2008 6:09 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by iano
02-06-2008 5:56 AM


Re: JEEZ
It should be clear by now that when you say "our", the grouping you are referring to must be mentioned as well. Is it:
"Our" is the "whole" of humanity affecting "all" our lives today. Was not this Jesus purpose?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by iano, posted 02-06-2008 5:56 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by iano, posted 02-07-2008 7:24 PM pelican has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 59 of 151 (454616)
02-07-2008 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by iano
02-07-2008 7:24 PM


Re: JEEZ
There is no collective "our" when it comes to Jesus' purpose. He has one purpose for the saved. And another purpose for the non-saved (namely to make it possible that they be saved)
Why does Jesus divide humanity in this way? How does he make it possible to be saved?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by iano, posted 02-07-2008 7:24 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by iano, posted 02-08-2008 4:53 AM pelican has not replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 70 of 151 (458260)
02-28-2008 12:41 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by Rrhain
02-27-2008 3:58 AM


This assumes that Jesus had anything to do with sin in the first place. It is quite conceivable that the mythology surrounding Jesus is simply incorrect. It may very well be that there is somebody who could "die for our sins" but that Jesus was not it.
I think it was a fair assumption to make as christians do believe this to be true. I used to sing hymms about jesus dying for us and I did believe it.
My personal opinion concerning the life of jesus has radically changed from that I had ingrained in me as a child. It seems you too have a different perception of the teachings of jesus.
I no longer believe jesus died for our sins at all. I now find it quite ludicrous to know I did believe it, without question. What about you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Rrhain, posted 02-27-2008 3:58 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Rrhain, posted 03-01-2008 6:05 PM pelican has replied
 Message 77 by IamJoseph, posted 05-17-2008 3:19 AM pelican has not replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 74 of 151 (458740)
03-01-2008 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Rrhain
03-01-2008 6:05 PM


disputing concepts and interpretations of the bible
True, but to accept that assumption makes the whole thread pointless. If we're going to accept Christian theology as accurate, then it necessarily follows that Jesus did not die "in vain" for our sins because that is what the theology insists. Christian theology rests upon the idea that Jesus, and specifically Jesus, "died for our sins."
Ah, I've done it again. Apologies. I meant the 'concept' of christian theolgy as believed by many. To those who believe it, it is true. For those who don't, it is a concept.
How can that possibly be "in vain" since that was the entire reason for Jesus' existence?
Maybe the entire reason for jesus' existence is a concept. Maybe the existence of sin is a concept. Maybe the existence of god is a concept. They are not provable or disprovable until obseved in reality.
The accuracy of the bible is not in question in this thread. The debate is concerned with the concepts and interpretations of the bible, which are deadly serious. The assumptions of the meanings are those which I wish to dispute.
My religious opinions are for me and me alone. I take very strong care not to say what they are here because I do not wish people to have people say, "Well, of course you would say that...you're an X."
Well, you are entitled to keep your own council. However, I feel if I personally am not prepared to stand up for my beliefs then I have no right to dispute anothers'. I've been called far worse than an x, mostly on this forum, but I know it is the name caller who has these thoughts, not I. Regards

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Rrhain, posted 03-01-2008 6:05 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2008 8:12 AM pelican has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 76 of 151 (458789)
03-02-2008 8:23 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Rrhain
03-02-2008 8:12 AM


Re: disputing concepts and interpretations of the bible
I am disgusted with your reply.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2008 8:12 AM Rrhain has not replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 134 of 151 (470005)
06-08-2008 10:03 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by jaywill
06-02-2008 12:37 PM


The question is Did Jesus Die in Vain?
My answer is that if it were possible for Jesus to die in vain the universe would not exist.
The only reason anything at all exists is because of the work and Person of Jesus.
Jeez, what a load of b#######!
Good god, what a small world in that mind-set.
Don't you give any credit to the rest of humanity?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by jaywill, posted 06-02-2008 12:37 PM jaywill has not replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 135 of 151 (470007)
06-08-2008 10:17 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by Brian
06-08-2008 6:38 AM


religious fear
Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and all these other crazy faiths have all ruined our world.
Hallelujah to that!
I am sick of being told to respect others beliefs systems when they clearly oppose mine. Religous belief systems drive me nuts! Crazy! Crazy! Giving control of their own lives up to a fictious god. Unbelievable! What are they so afraid of?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Brian, posted 06-08-2008 6:38 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by Brian, posted 06-09-2008 8:31 AM pelican has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 139 of 151 (472915)
06-25-2008 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by Brian
06-09-2008 8:31 AM


Re: religious fear
I have observed believers seemingly living thier lives in order to go to heaven when they die. Fear of eternal damnation is a pretty good reason to believe but it doesn't allow much freedom to live.
Religious beliefs do not accept/incorporate humanity as normal. The foundation belief is that we are not perfect which in itself leads us not be ourselves. Some lives are completely lived trying to be better.
The self-rightious amongst the believers even think they are better. What happened to we are all equal?
My observations are purely from my own life experiences and maybe some religions lead the way to become everything you can be. Maybe they teach their young to draw their own conclusions and make their own decisions. Maybe there are some who teach to believe in yourself and nothing else matters, but I haven't found one yet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Brian, posted 06-09-2008 8:31 AM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by IamJoseph, posted 06-27-2008 9:13 PM pelican has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 142 of 151 (473259)
06-27-2008 11:50 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by IamJoseph
06-27-2008 9:13 PM


Re: religious fear
I see your view is mainly through 'laws'. My perspective is from the human being's experience of all these 'laws'. How religious beliefs {laws) affect the individual human being and humanity as a whole.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by IamJoseph, posted 06-27-2008 9:13 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by IamJoseph, posted 06-28-2008 12:08 AM pelican has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 146 of 151 (473268)
06-28-2008 12:20 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by Phat
06-27-2008 11:56 PM


Re: Sense , Nonsense and Absence
Sin can be defined many ways. To me, sin is the willful absence of God. IOW, we choose to run the show and ultimately screw it up.
This obviously doesn't apply to Goerge Bush
Are we too old for the fairytale? Or are we too arrogant to consider it?
Or, 'are we believing a fairytale and do not want to grow up and take responsibility for the screw up'?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Phat, posted 06-27-2008 11:56 PM Phat has not replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 147 of 151 (473269)
06-28-2008 12:42 AM
Reply to: Message 144 by IamJoseph
06-28-2008 12:08 AM


Re: religious fear
Everything is a law - including love, humanity, kindness, justice, life and the universe itself.
Everything is a law insofar as they exist including fear, hate etc; but surely it is down to choice?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by IamJoseph, posted 06-28-2008 12:08 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by IamJoseph, posted 06-28-2008 1:36 AM pelican has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 149 of 151 (473285)
06-28-2008 2:32 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by IamJoseph
06-28-2008 1:36 AM


Re: religious fear
Laws need choice, and choice needs laws - none of these can prevail without the other.
Choosing to love or fear does not require a law. It's a normal response.
- and all the laws of humanity which are true and correct laws are pointed at this premise.
How do you know which laws are true and correct?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by IamJoseph, posted 06-28-2008 1:36 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by IamJoseph, posted 06-28-2008 3:57 AM pelican has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5015 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 151 of 151 (473588)
07-01-2008 12:46 AM
Reply to: Message 150 by IamJoseph
06-28-2008 3:57 AM


Re: religious fear
Everything is a law - including love, humanity, kindness, justice, life and the universe itself. It is significant that the world's only OPEN revelation was ushered in with laws - and it was given to those who wanted anything but more laws, having just been freed from laws of slavery.
The term law is misunderstood, while the notion of love is incorrectly applied as if someone just discovered it. Actually, love is a law, and two other laws transcend it: HONESTY [3rd command from Sinai], and then by RESPECT [4th command] - for what is love w/o honesty and respect - other than a lawless love?
Choosing to love or fear does not require a law. It's a normal response.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Correct. Thus these are not laws.
I think you are contradicting yourself here and losing me in the process

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by IamJoseph, posted 06-28-2008 3:57 AM IamJoseph has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024