But we don't care, see that's the thing. If I told you a dog was killed you may sympathize, sure, I would too. But the truth is dogs are killed every hour, every day, and we do nothing to stop this.
Oni, none of us are omniscient or omnipresent. It sounds as if you are making unreasonable demands like if I can't personally stop animal cruelty in some backwoods part of Idaho, I must not care about animal cruelty.
We have enough people who are poor, starving, living bellow standards, who will grow up to be criminals, develop drug addictions, and, go on to have more fuckn' kids who will repeat this never ending process.
So lets execute the poor and drug addicted since they're blights on humanity, Margaret Sanger style.
We don't need every pregnancy to go to term. People die of starvation every day. The world, and the US, is over populated.
Then.... don't..... get...... pregnant.
You are treating the symptom instead of treating the disease.
In the U.S. hunger and race are related. In 1991 46% of African-American children were chronically hungry, and 40% of Latino children were chronically hungry compared to 16% of white children.
Wait, so are you saying that grocery stores won't allow 46% of blacks 40% of latino's to purchase food? The only color that matters is green.
The infant mortality rate is closely linked to inadequate nutrition among pregnant women. The U.S. ranks 23rd among industrial nations in infant mortality. African-American infants die at nearly twice the rate of white infants.
So what are you saying? That African-American women not eating right should just kill the fetus preemptively to get it out of the way? I'm struggling to see where abortion is tied in here.
One out of every eight children under the age of twelve in the U.S. goes to bed hungry every night.
Oni, that isn't because there isn't enough food in the US! There is ample food in the United States. It is a matter of getting a job to pay for food. If the parent cannot feed that child, that child should be removed from that dangerous environment.
Abortion is a necessary service. And the numbers above are just for the US. Globally, it is sickening.
Abortion isn't the solution, not getting pregnant in the first place is.
If resources were abundant, jobs abundant, food abundant, living conditions equal for everyone, money equal for everyone, then you could set up a mandatory "do the time" situation. But the reality of the matter is we have too many unwanted children who will grow up in poverty, some starve to death, some grow up to be criminals, drug addicts, have many kids of their own..... And all for what? So we can feel good about ourselves that we didn't allow someone to terminate a pregnancy?
So abortion is going to create jobs, create food, create healthy living conditions, eradicate poverty, stop drug addiction, etc? You are stringing together a series of social ills as if one has anything to do with the other.
Did you know that an early leader of the abortion movement,
Margaret Sanger, sought to use abortion as a means of clearing the "weeds of society?" Basically she makes the same arguments you are, except she hated black people.
Like I said, and you agreed, everyone is pro-life until they get tested. Then reality punches them in the face and they wake up from the fake world of no consequences.
That doesn't mean that everyone fails the test, it means some people are hypocrites.
No. You said they had the intent to "murder a baby." That is just wrong. That is not the intent.
Are you finding my use of the word "baby" and "murder" objectionable, are the whole premise?
They don't "jam a vacuum up a crotch," dude. You say it as though everyone is enjoying the fuckn' thing
I just think if most people
actually knew the details and were allowed to see the same sonogram the doctor is using to systematically disembody their fetus to the tune of anywhere between $400-$1,500, they'd suddenly see a light bulb go off. No where on the planned parenthood or naral websites are there ANY descriptions of what abortions entail.
Every murderer was a fetus.
Was.
But more to the point, no one is having an abortion to kill babies, as though they wanted to. They judged the situation and felt it would be best to not bring another unwanted life into the world.
But there is a rebuttal for every excuse imaginable. Okay, you don't want the baby. But please look at how many people want to adopt. Mom doesn't get baby in the way of her life, dad doesn't have to pay child support, foster parents finally get their bundle of joy, and baby is allowed to live like we are. It's hard to argue with that simple rationalization.
The very government who would impose a law against abortions! Ask any inner city kid if anyone in the government cares for them and is taking measures to see to it that they grow up with a good education, with food, a place to live, etc.
There is a statute for every one of those. I mean, your solution to possibly growing up wrong is just to kill him! I'm sure they'd thank you if they were alive!
No one gives a shit in the sense that no one will be responsible for the child as it grows up. That sole responsibility is for the person who had them. If that is the case, then they have full rights to decide to have it.
Then they have the full right to at any time revoke their rights.
™ Version 4.2
(1)