Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Multiculturalism
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 373 of 1234 (739064)
10-19-2014 7:35 PM
Reply to: Message 371 by Modulous
10-19-2014 7:24 PM


They are all crimes you might commit or attempt to commit that might result in you getting shot and feeling that you need to avoid hospital to avoid the police being involved.
Well, no they aren't.
No, but I expect you to at least want to give off the impression you were consistent. And I was right.
But I have no real desire to give off the impression you were consistent.
In many instances I mam not consistent and only a fool would always want consistency.
You were arguing from a principle that practices, even against children, can/should be permitted under certain conditions. The removal of the the boy's penis mirrors quite closely the effects of certain FGM operations - so it stands to reason that if you were to stand by your general principle you'd have to accept that infant penisectomy's should be allowed by law. And you do.
But that is just misrepresentation on your part.
I have no such general principle as you seem to imply.
I see the side effects as the major problem when it comes to this particular issue. The LAW is the problem. But it's your law and if you folk like it, that's fine with me. I just think it is a stupid law that causes more damage than it might cure. But as I said, it is YOUR stupid law.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 371 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 7:24 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 374 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 8:05 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 376 of 1234 (739067)
10-19-2014 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 374 by Modulous
10-19-2014 8:05 PM


So you are saying that people who get shot never try and avoid hospital? I've never been in the situation before, so is this just an urban legend or something?
Too funny.
No I was saying I would never attempt those things.
I'm not sure what you think your point is here jar. How should this factor into my reasoning process?
Fumble fingers. What I meant to say was that I have no real desire to give off the impression that I am consistent.
So - it seems to me, based on the position you have advanced as quoted above, you would agree that that which applies to female genitals likewise applies to male genitals. Since removing the penis is basically as disabling as removing the clitoris and labia it stands to reason, based on your own argument, that you would take this position. I was right in my conclusion, and I'm perplexed that you would query this so much.
I'm still confused how you could think I took any such position.
So let's talk about that, eh? I understand the damage you say the law causes, what damage does allowing people to breach established human rights do and why do you think the balance should go the way you suggest?
I'm sorry but what basic human rights are being breached?
How the balance would go would depend a great deal on whether or not a reasonable law could be passed. What if such surgery were decriminalized and allowed to be performed in a hospital under sterile and hygienic conditions by an experienced, trained and certified surgeon?
And yes, my position is based on multiculturalism, that I am not sure I am competent to legislate morality or cultural mores.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 374 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 8:05 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 377 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 9:03 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 378 of 1234 (739070)
10-19-2014 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 377 by Modulous
10-19-2014 9:03 PM


The rights of the individuals who are having unnecessary and significantly damaging medical procedures performed on them without their consent.
But I do not see where any such rights are being infringed. Rights are not universal and depend on a cultural context.
I have already discussed the rights involved in prepuce removal such as Article I of the Declaration of Human rights and German Basic Law as well as referencing EUCHR, if you want some codified examples.
Declarations of Human Rights are not, to the best of my knowledge, anything that carries the force or law. I am not a German and so German Basic Law is pretty irrelevant. Nor is the European Council for Health Research.
So nobody should try? That we should let 'it's my culture' be justification for any offence as long as it isn't too crippling?
You should be free to speak against it, to try to persuade people that your position is correct, to change practices but I'm not at all sure you should try to criminalize such things.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 377 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 9:03 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 379 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 9:35 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 380 of 1234 (739072)
10-19-2014 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 379 by Modulous
10-19-2014 9:35 PM


I figured you were talking about the European Council for Health Research.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 379 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 9:35 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 381 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 9:46 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 382 of 1234 (739086)
10-20-2014 8:55 AM
Reply to: Message 381 by Modulous
10-19-2014 9:46 PM


Okay, thanks for clearing that point up.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 381 by Modulous, posted 10-19-2014 9:46 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 387 by Modulous, posted 10-20-2014 12:36 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 390 of 1234 (739104)
10-20-2014 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 387 by Modulous
10-20-2014 12:36 PM


Sure.
Learning to deal with and understand other cultures is difficult and no culture has all the answers.
Wasting time on passing laws criminalizing FGM is just utterly stupid and only makes the situation worse when real issues are not being addressed. Lets deal with getting drunk drivers off the roads and other important issues.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 387 by Modulous, posted 10-20-2014 12:36 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 393 by Modulous, posted 10-20-2014 1:01 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 408 of 1234 (739133)
10-20-2014 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 393 by Modulous
10-20-2014 1:01 PM


Lets. But unless you propose that DUI is typically performed by a specific cultural group or related groups, it wouldn't really be on topic. You can't be suggesting putting a moratorium on legislation until one specific crime is wiped out permanently can you?
I have supported why I believe the law criminalizing FGM is stupid and ineffective and only makes things worse. Try reading.
And no, again try reading. What I said was deal with real issues before worrying about almost irrelevant issues. Deal with things that do harm to far more people every year.
But I understand, your politicians are about as stupid as our politicians.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 393 by Modulous, posted 10-20-2014 1:01 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 409 by Modulous, posted 10-20-2014 4:14 PM jar has replied
 Message 410 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-20-2014 4:40 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 411 of 1234 (739158)
10-21-2014 8:41 AM
Reply to: Message 409 by Modulous
10-20-2014 4:14 PM


I'm personally fond of having a police force that tackles both child abuse and traffic violations as well as also tackling sex crimes, murder, robbery etc. I don't think that's a stupid way of doing things.
Which mighjt actually be a reasonable position if it were true, but I have seen no evidence that it is.
You admit that FGM still happens in the UK, If so, the law was ineffective as a deterrent, which is reasonable. The purpose of laws is not to deter acts as much as to make it possible to punish folk after the fact.
Law abiding folk will follow reasonable procedure whether or not those procedures carry the force of law. Put up speed limit sings and I would follow them even if there was no penalty for exceeding them.
Sorry but I still see your position as simply stupid.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 409 by Modulous, posted 10-20-2014 4:14 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 413 by Straggler, posted 10-21-2014 9:09 AM jar has replied
 Message 414 by vimesey, posted 10-21-2014 9:11 AM jar has replied
 Message 415 by Tangle, posted 10-21-2014 9:58 AM jar has replied
 Message 416 by Phat, posted 10-21-2014 10:34 AM jar has not replied
 Message 429 by Modulous, posted 10-21-2014 1:48 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 412 of 1234 (739159)
10-21-2014 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 410 by New Cat's Eye
10-20-2014 4:40 PM


I assume I am corresponding with adults.
Sorry but all three of those people do not seem to be able to read within context.
NMP.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 410 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-20-2014 4:40 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 442 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-22-2014 9:57 AM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 423 of 1234 (739184)
10-21-2014 1:06 PM
Reply to: Message 413 by Straggler
10-21-2014 9:09 AM


I would say that it is simply an indication of the general lack of morals; pretty much universal I fear and a sad commentary on the general public.
Yet people still get caught speeding. And thus the real value of the law.
But what we find is that even there we do not seem able to apply law evenly or universally. The rich and powerful seem somehow able to avoid consequences.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 413 by Straggler, posted 10-21-2014 9:09 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 434 by Straggler, posted 10-22-2014 5:53 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 424 of 1234 (739185)
10-21-2014 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 414 by vimesey
10-21-2014 9:11 AM


Again, that is simply a very sad commentary on general morality. But if even one person does not slow down then the law was ineffective as a deterrent.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 414 by vimesey, posted 10-21-2014 9:11 AM vimesey has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 441 by xongsmith, posted 10-22-2014 9:47 AM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 425 of 1234 (739186)
10-21-2014 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 415 by Tangle
10-21-2014 9:58 AM


Despite your protests, you will break the law every time you get in your car and drive more than a couple of miles.
And your support for that statement is?
Sorry charlie, but you are once again simply wrong.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 415 by Tangle, posted 10-21-2014 9:58 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 427 by Tangle, posted 10-21-2014 1:27 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 436 of 1234 (739242)
10-22-2014 9:04 AM
Reply to: Message 427 by Tangle
10-21-2014 1:27 PM


Learn to read.
What I said is that if a prohibited act happens then the law that prohibited the act was ineffective.
Sorry but that is self-evident.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 427 by Tangle, posted 10-21-2014 1:27 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 443 by xongsmith, posted 10-22-2014 10:00 AM jar has replied
 Message 458 by Tangle, posted 10-22-2014 2:09 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 437 of 1234 (739243)
10-22-2014 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 429 by Modulous
10-21-2014 1:48 PM


I speak for myself. If I am an exception then that is simply an indication of the lack of morality in others.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 429 by Modulous, posted 10-21-2014 1:48 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 453 by Modulous, posted 10-22-2014 1:10 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 438 of 1234 (739244)
10-22-2014 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 434 by Straggler
10-22-2014 5:53 AM


Both.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 434 by Straggler, posted 10-22-2014 5:53 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 439 by Straggler, posted 10-22-2014 9:31 AM jar has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024