Permitting gay adoption of orphans leads naturally to gay adoption full stop. Which leads to 'market' demand for children (for gays) which cannot be supplied by orphans alone (indeed, gay couples might prefer to produce a child themselves (in so far as they can)). Which leads to the market fulfilling that demand - which leads to a structural situation in which children are produced specifically for gay (couples) meaning the right listed above is abandoned by design.
So your arguement against letting gays adopt is that they'll eventually adopt all the children and then there'll naturally be some sort of black market where children are bred just for the gays to parent? What is the weather like, up your own ass?
edit: whoops, this is for
iano not
Larni
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.
It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod MinistryLive every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor
™ Version 4.2
