Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Science, Religion, God – Let’s just be honest
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 14 of 174 (715596)
01-07-2014 5:29 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by scienceishonesty
01-07-2014 4:22 PM


false dichotomies.
I stand by my assertion that one cannot fully and unwaveringly adhere to a religion and science at the same time.
I see such assertions quite often and they always just seem absurd propounding from little minds.
I adhere to Christianity and science at the same time and thus refute that assertion.
When one BELIEVES in a religion they already assume that it is correct on SOME level, whether it is extreme fundamentalism or strictly that "Jesus died on the cross to save us from our sins". At some level the religious person draws a line and says "this is truth regardless of what science might make probable or improbable".
Again, that is just another false dichotomy. Even though I am a Christian I believe with a very high confidence level that Christianity at least partially false as is every other religion.
The Map is not the Territory.
Such assertions as you are making seem to show up from two sources, members of the Christian Cults of Ignorance and from ex-members of one of the Christian Cult of Ignorance churches. But that is NOT Christianity. Christianity contains a far wider selection pool that what you find by trawling the CCoI waters.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 4:22 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 6:01 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 19 of 174 (715607)
01-07-2014 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by scienceishonesty
01-07-2014 6:01 PM


Re: false dichotomies.
I'm sorry but what you seem to think are "a formidable argument" is really nothing that was not debated and caste aside as sophomoric back before I really was a sophomore.
If you take Christianity and look at the different extremes represented in 1 being very mild and 10 being the most fundamental, even if you choose 1, you're clinging on to a firm and unwavering belief in SOME aspect of that religion and believe it to be absolutely "the truth" regardless of what science has to so.
Bullshit. Sorry but that is simply another example of you making unfounded assertions, and as I said, when the seventh graders tried such "a formidable argument" the received a pat on the head for effort and a suggestion that they read "Language in Thought and Action".
So perhaps you might be able to support your assertion. Remember, just because YOU can't do something does not mean all of us cannot do something.
The very idea that you can assign levels like 1-10 to define something as "mild" or "fundamental" simply shows you really don't have a basis yet for what you want to say. Fundamental and mild are totally unrelated. It would like creating a scale with limes on one end and rocking horses on the other. It's just word salad.
That's okay. It takes time and experience to develop such concepts. Keep trying.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 6:01 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 6:23 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(2)
Message 21 of 174 (715609)
01-07-2014 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by scienceishonesty
01-07-2014 6:23 PM


Re: false dichotomies.
Blah blah blah, I hit your touchy defense mechanisms and the sirens are going off.
You really don't have a clue do you?
But here are some teachings I do hold to be true pretty much no matter what. As always when someone asks about absolutes I need to give a chuckle because while I would hope all of these teachings would be true I of course and also understand that there are also instances when I would say they are false.
That we should love others as we love ourselves.
That we are charged to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, comfort the sorrowful, heal the sick, teach the ignorant.
That I will likely be judged based on what i have done in this life.
That I have the capability to know right from wrong and I am charged to try to chose wisely since almost never will the choice really be simply right or wrong.
That when I fail I should acknowledge my failure, be contrite, try to make amends and try not to make the same mistake in the future.
There are five to start with.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 6:23 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 7:12 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 23 of 174 (715613)
01-07-2014 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by scienceishonesty
01-07-2014 7:12 PM


Re: false dichotomies.
You still seemed locked into binary thinking. Sad. Open up and throw binary thinking away.
Hopefully they are tenets held by many religions. But they are also the tenets that Jesus taught.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 7:12 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 8:05 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(3)
Message 27 of 174 (715625)
01-07-2014 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by scienceishonesty
01-07-2014 8:05 PM


Re: false dichotomies.
A devout cradle creedal Episcopalian who grew up in a devout Christian family, educated in a Christian school, who helped found new churches, taught adult and child Sunday schools and have been the webmaster for several Christian church websites.
So far I have not side-stepped any questions, basic or otherwise.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 8:05 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 8:58 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 30 of 174 (715629)
01-07-2014 9:09 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by scienceishonesty
01-07-2014 8:58 PM


Re: false dichotomies.
And I answered to explain what I am.
I am a cradle creedal Episcopalian.
Did you not read "A devout cradle creedal Episcopalian who grew up in a devout Christian family, educated in a Christian school, who helped found new churches, taught adult and child Sunday schools and have been the webmaster for several Christian church websites." as I posted in Message 27?
Or maybe you are not familiar with the recognized Christian sects?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-07-2014 8:58 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 9:35 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 37 of 174 (715678)
01-08-2014 10:02 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by scienceishonesty
01-08-2014 9:35 AM


Re: false dichotomies.
So as a Christian you believe that Christ died for the sins of the world, right?
No. Jesus died because Jesus was born and anything (human at least) will die.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 9:35 AM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 10:10 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 40 of 174 (715683)
01-08-2014 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by scienceishonesty
01-08-2014 10:10 AM


Re: false dichotomies.
HUH?
Couldda saved alotta time but I am willing to bet you are still as clueless as when you began.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 10:10 AM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 10:17 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 42 of 174 (715687)
01-08-2014 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by scienceishonesty
01-08-2014 10:17 AM


Re: false dichotomies.
Yup, ignorance and clueless.
But are you interested in being educated and informed about my beliefs instead of just continuing to misrepresent what I believe?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 10:17 AM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 10:50 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(2)
Message 47 of 174 (715697)
01-08-2014 11:19 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by scienceishonesty
01-08-2014 10:50 AM


Re: false dichotomies.
This means you are acknowledging Jesus did not die for any sins and that Jesus was not divine. Since Christianity the religion rests on Jesus being of divine origin and that he died on the cross to save us from sin, we can cleanly wipe that off of the table. If you don't believe that there's no reason to discuss anything about it. My only issue is with people who believe in a particular religion that affirms a set of beliefs that are true no matter what (which is practically what religion is to begin with).
Again, that post simply shows how totally ignorant about Christianity and limited in your thinking ability you are at this stage, but that can be cured if you want and are willing to work at it.
Granted the Christian Cult of Ignorance chapters of Club Christian do teach such utter nonsense but that is partly what drives any thinking people away from the religion.
If Jesus was divine while living here on earth among us then his death would have been meaningless and just make God look stupid. Humans can't just kill Gods. That's one way to tell if something really is a God. So if that were the case then Jesus death and resurrection are just a sham, a con-job.
Further, if God can forgive sins then the act gets even funnier. Are you claiming that God decides that instead of just forgiving sins She decides to put on a human costume, get killed, reborn and only then forgive sins? And someone is expected to believe that?
Not all chapters of Christianity are so shallow and simplistic as to use that as the basis of their beliefs.
BUT ... imagine a God actually becoming human, not part god part human, not god and human, not god in a human costume but just human. Imagine god not able to walk or talk or control his bowels or feed himself and having to learn to see and hear and understand and learn to walk and learn to talk and learn to go potty...
Imagine god knowing nothing more than what he is taught and experienced over thirty years; not all knowing, all powerful, just another human.
Now that is a sacrifice.
Imagine that god now only human living a life to teach by example. To teach us what a human can be, to say "Here, look, this is what human is and can be."
Imagine this Jesus saying "Take up your cross and follow me; feed the hungry, clothe the naked, shelter the homeless, comfort the sorrowful, teach the ignorant..."
Christianity can be more than just a religion based on "What's in it for me?" or "Jesus the get outta hell card."

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 10:50 AM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 6:16 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 53 of 174 (715736)
01-08-2014 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by scienceishonesty
01-08-2014 6:16 PM


Re: false dichotomies.
You seem to be those unique Christians who somehow can keep Christ and all the characters in the Bible as real but without needing the Bible -- I get it and yes that probably makes your position seem a lot more reasonable than someone who is willing to give the Bible a face value reading. The point is, you still have a bunch of religious ideas that you've managed to come up with that you hold to be true independent of the Bible and that makes it no different in relation to my point than if you were deriving those ideas as a direct interpretation from the Bible.
Stop misrepresenting my position.
Learn to actually read what is written.
No where have I said I do not need the Bible. Sorry but the Bible (actually since there is no such thing as "The Bible" I studied most of the Canons as well as extra-canonical writings) is the primary source for any mention of a character Jesus of Nazareth. There are no independent sources for such a person.
The connection to the topic though is you assertion that Science and Religion cannot coexist, that because I am religious, devoutly religious, I avoid science or scientific conclusions.
You seem to have a basic misunderstanding of meanings of pretty simple words.
Believe and know are not synonyms.
That is the first step you need to take, Once you fully understand that we can take the next step.
So should I just "imagine" this as you say or is this something you believe really happened? Okay so we get it, most of the Bible is garbage according to you (bravo for figuring that one out). But oh, this particular teaching, well, you must know that this is what REALLY happened! It must feel similar to being your own prophet. You read what a bunch of people had to say about Jesus but you've been able to crack the code on what really happened.
Again, stop representing my position.
Remember believe and know are not synonyms.
That is what I believe happened, but it is irrelevant whether it is what actually happened or not.
No where do I say that any part of the Bible is garbage, only a complete fool would make such an assertion and a fool is one thing I am not.
What really happened is totally irrelevant.
Would the world be better if we feed the hungry, clothed the naked, sheltered the homeless, educated the ignorant, comforted the sorrowful?
Even if all the tales about Jesus are just stories told around a campfire (likely camel dung) the message still resonates.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 6:16 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 6:54 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 55 of 174 (715742)
01-08-2014 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by scienceishonesty
01-08-2014 6:54 PM


Re: false dichotomies.
You simply continue to misrepresent my position, but I'll try yet again.
People usually believe something because they think that they are pretty sure it's true. You seem to use the word "believe" extremely lightly, to the point where it becomes an almost trivial inanity. No one really "knows" 100% anything, we should reserve BELIEF for something that has evidence, not as a replacement for "I don't know if this is true or not but I like to think maybe it might be so because it sure sounds like a hoot".
Please show where I said anything like "I don't know if this is true or not but I like to think maybe it might be so because it sure sounds like a hoot".
Or you could stop misrepresenting what I write.
An honest person when presented evidence that even a strongly held belief has been refuted simply say, "Damn, I was wrong but that sure is interesting." and moves on.
I never said religion and science cannot coexist in terms of one being religious and also embracing scientific ideas. Many religious people accept a whole host of scientific realities. I said that the religious principle (I know my deity is true, I have an understanding of what he/she/they want(s) and it's important to follow it) and the principle that science IS (we need to question what we think we know and figure out what truth is) cannot be compatible. Would it make you feel better if I said that my point is geared to 99.999999% of what a "religion" is? Minus you, of course, who is almost exclusive among men in having a fleeting "belief" that may very well soon be acknowledged by you as being false the second it becomes almost entirely implausible.
But yet you seem unaware that even some religious schools teach students to question God; that even the Bible teaches us that we should be questioning God.
Do you understand what "Israel" means?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 6:54 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 7:34 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 57 of 174 (715753)
01-08-2014 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by scienceishonesty
01-08-2014 7:34 PM


Re: false dichotomies.
Something to the effect of: "Victorious with El (the Sumerian chief god later becoming a synonym for "god" in general -- alluding to Yaweh which was derived from El)"
Not quite. And this is important. It means "Struggles with God".
Remember, Jesus was a Jew not a Christian. If you read the Bible you find that a major theme is both man and god struggling with the concepts of what is right and what is wrong. It's understanding that such questions are complex and not easily solved and that very seldom is there really a right answer.
If your belief is just an idea that you want to think somehow holds merit without any real evidence, that's pretty much a description of the above statement I made. When you really believe something, you actually believe it. You're pretty sure it's right based on personal or scientific evidence. Belief should be something HUGE, not something that one is preparing to relatively swiftly disregard when the evidence comes knocking at the door.
That does seem to be your position. I find that sad and pitiful.
Reality is. It does not really care very much what I believe is true and in the end, regardless of my very strongly held beliefs, reality still is.
I'd have to be a fool to continue holding a belief once presented with evidence that refutes my belief, and one thing I am not, is a fool.
This is not the thread to get into even the Bible teaching us that we should be questioning God but it is there and I can most certainly support that assertion. If you want, start a thread on the subject.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-08-2014 7:34 PM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-09-2014 9:51 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 59 of 174 (715795)
01-09-2014 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by scienceishonesty
01-09-2014 9:51 AM


An yet more strawmen.
That's fine. So lets start asking ourselves questions instead of just believing out of the blue that we get our morals from from Jesus necessarily.
It's a good thing that I never made such a claim then isn't it?
I stated pretty clearly that when I really believe something it is based on something I feel there is good evidence for.
That's fine. But in case you had not noticed, you are not me.
sh writes:
jar writes:
This is not the thread to get into even the Bible teaching us that we should be questioning God but it is there and I can most certainly support that assertion. If you want, start a thread on the subject.
I only asked for a quick verse, not to change the direction of the discussion.
But you asked a question that requires more thought than will fit on a bumper sticker. A quick verse instead of understanding is the hallmark of fundamentalism whether religious or atheistic. It stops thinking.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-09-2014 9:51 AM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-09-2014 10:25 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 61 of 174 (715797)
01-09-2014 10:38 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by scienceishonesty
01-09-2014 10:25 AM


Re: An yet more strawmen.
You need to stop misrepresenting my position.
Just being a Christian does not imply in anyway that my morals come from Jesus.
You need to move beyond black/white, right/wrong, yes/no thinking.
And again, I have explained to you that I do not use quote mining. When will you learn to read?
You are still as clueless as when you posted the OP it seems.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-09-2014 10:25 AM scienceishonesty has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-09-2014 11:28 AM jar has replied
 Message 66 by GDR, posted 01-09-2014 12:06 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024