Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Science, Religion, God – Let’s just be honest
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 96 of 174 (716478)
01-17-2014 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by scienceishonesty
01-16-2014 4:26 PM


So have you found enough honesty yet to realize and admit that people can have a religion that doesn't require assuming they know some absolute truth?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by scienceishonesty, posted 01-16-2014 4:26 PM scienceishonesty has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Straggler, posted 01-17-2014 3:27 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 99 of 174 (716486)
01-17-2014 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Straggler
01-17-2014 3:27 PM


Isn't that what scienceishonesty ultimately is saying?
I dunno, he said that if you didn't hold beliefs to an absolute truth, then it didn't count as a religion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Straggler, posted 01-17-2014 3:27 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by Straggler, posted 01-21-2014 4:19 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 102 of 174 (716823)
01-21-2014 4:43 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Straggler
01-21-2014 4:19 PM


What message is that from?
Seems consistency isn't their strong suit...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Straggler, posted 01-21-2014 4:19 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by Straggler, posted 01-21-2014 4:59 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 105 of 174 (716829)
01-21-2014 5:04 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by Straggler
01-21-2014 4:59 PM


I don't see him saying that at all.
I'll just wait to hear it straight from the horse's mouth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Straggler, posted 01-21-2014 4:59 PM Straggler has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 118 of 174 (716872)
01-21-2014 11:31 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by Modulous
01-21-2014 6:36 PM


Re: trademark disrespect from jar
For instance: Scrites are shavalabal.
This is not subject to evidential scrutiny.
Ergo agnosticism?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Modulous, posted 01-21-2014 6:36 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Straggler, posted 01-22-2014 8:53 AM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 120 by Modulous, posted 01-22-2014 9:46 AM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024