You miss my point, being that there's a whole lota difference in controlled usage of randomness by intelligent beings in a controlled environment with processes set up to utilize randomness within purposefully programmed proceedures implementing specified plans people propose.
No, I understood your point. (Please don't assume that just because I disagree, I don't understand.)
But you're completely wrong. When intelligent people use their intelligence to copy the work of nature, there's absolutely no difference at all between intelligent use of controlled randomness (great phrase btw) and
nature's use of controlled randomness.
Absolutely no difference whatsoever. The results don't get magically infused with some "essence" of intelligence. The results of genetic programming and evolutionary engineering are just as much a product of randomness and haphazard selection and recombination as things are in the natural world; and those results are almost always far more advanced than anything intelligence alone is capable of.
I understood your point completely. But your point was completely wrong.