Does radio-carbon dating disprove evolution?

Yes we know that you said that. A few questions.What is the atomic number of Nitrogen?What is the atomic number Carbon?What the hell does all that nonsense about cold fusion have to do with anything?Do you even know what fusion is?Do you even know what fission is?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Percy, help me on one other point.I was taught that one of the reasons that radiocarbon dating was limited in scope to around 50,000 years was that beyond that level, it becomes hard to separate readings from what one would expect as a general background noise.It would seem to me that anyone using radiocarbon dating where it shows an age greater than 50,000 years (maybe slightly longer with newer instrumentation) is simply looking at nonsense readings that have no meaning at all.Is that still pretty much the case?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Does or does NOT?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

It is even sillier than that and a great example of the metal gymnastics Biblical Contortionists go through. They take the "one day is like a Thousand Years" and then only selectively apply it to the six days of creation. It's fun to watch them dance and spin, but it is a tragedy how they butcher both the Bible and Christianity to satisfy their personal Hubris.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion