If I continue to address each of these assertions beyond this point, I would be reprimanded by the admins for being off-topic, as it is supposed to be about how radio-carbon dating disproves evolution.
Peleg writes:
Ok but the best scientist don't always go with the general consensus and I would say that there are at least a hundred good examples were the general scientific consensus was dead wrong and often deadly.
Please feel free to start a new thread concering a discussion of this topic. I would like to see a debate about the issues brought up by Thomas Kuhn in his book
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. I think such a discussion may help reveal how science works and how much strong evidence it takes to the overthrow a prevailing scientific theory as there appears to be some confusion among some posters in how and why this has occurred throughout history.
There are a lot references of dinosaur soft-tissue being found and to me it suggests that the general consensus is once again wrong
Once again, please feel free to propose a new topic on how such so-called soft-tissue overthrows current theories concerning the age and evolution of dinosaurs in the biosciences and geosciences.
I would suggest you pace yourself, however, and not try to propose more than one or two topics before any preexisting ones you have proposed, and have been accepted, max out at the 300 level. You may find it impossible to keep up if you try to support too many threads.
Please do not respond to this message as I would be unable to reply without breaking the rules.
Edited by anglagard, : clarity
Edited by anglagard, : speling as always
™ Version 4.2
