Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,895 Year: 4,152/9,624 Month: 1,023/974 Week: 350/286 Day: 6/65 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does radio-carbon dating disprove evolution?
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 217 of 308 (476478)
07-24-2008 5:03 AM
Reply to: Message 216 by johnfolton
07-24-2008 3:13 AM


Reference(s) please
The russians simply dated without fudging wood fossils frozen preserved showing an unbiased climatic study including tropical plants shows nothing dated older than 9,600 years. It showed climatologists that tropical plants no older than 9,600 years thrived on the artic circle.
OK - I want to see one or more references on this. Especially for the tropical part.
It wouldn't surprise me a great deal, if there were indeed non-tropical plants dated to that age. We get something along that line here in northern Minnesota. Which in no way rules out a long Earth history prior to those plants.
Moose
Edited by Minnemooseus, : Added 2nd sentence.
Edited by Minnemooseus, : Added 2nd paragraph.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by johnfolton, posted 07-24-2008 3:13 AM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-24-2008 9:19 AM Minnemooseus has not replied
 Message 222 by johnfolton, posted 07-24-2008 1:10 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024