Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How old is the Earth?!
mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 19 of 65 (12769)
07-04-2002 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Percy
07-04-2002 4:15 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Percipient:
Coe and Prevot didn't measure an actual field reversal, just an astonishingly rapid change in the angle of the dipole. This anomalous result isn't consistent with current understanding of the internal physics of the earth. Whether or not the Coe/Prevot finding stands the test of time, at best from a Creationist standpoint it indicates that the change from one direction to its opposite can be incredibly rapid, perhaps just a few weeks. But independent of the rapidity of the change, the radiometric data indicate the time between dipole reversals averages 200,000 years.
--Percy

Joe is best qualified to talk on this, since he has met one of the authors, but from memory, the effect occurred at an actual polarity reversal, when the flux was at or near zero (kind of like standing at the north pole with a compass, with the needle swaying in any direction). The phenomenon isn't well understood, but (again from memory), theoretically occurs whenever the earth actually does change N/S polarity, & the flux is at or near zero at any particular point. It most certainly doesn't indicate rapid, sudden polarity reversals (ie north pole becoming south)
This was my understanding, & I stand to be corrected.
Regardless, Prevot & Coe aren't happy with the creationist misinterpretation.
Mark
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Percy, posted 07-04-2002 4:15 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Joe Meert, posted 07-04-2002 5:59 PM mark24 has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 31 of 65 (12904)
07-06-2002 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by blitz77
07-06-2002 5:56 AM


Blitz,
How old do you think the earth is?
Mark
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by blitz77, posted 07-06-2002 5:56 AM blitz77 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024