Jor-el
Sidelined, as you must surely know there is no verse in the bible with these "scientific facts".By examining the gap theory we can correlate these facts with the word of God.
You are saying that the facts of science and the word of God are mutually related while st the same time saying there are no such "facts" in the bible.I am confused?
Earlier in this topic you stated and I quote
As I was explaining to randman, Verse one of Genesis is seperated from verse two by an unkown ammount of time which could be millions if not billions of years long.
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Gen 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
This means then that the Earth was created in the beginning.Then a vast amount of time passed {millions or billions} yet this is in conflict with the big bang since the Earth was not formed "in the beginning".
Also intriguing is the statement about the sirit of god moving upon the face of the waters on a planet earth which at the same time was without form and void.How do you accomplish this?
Since God inspired men to write the bible, we should try to understand what was written in light of present knowledge especially in the case of Genesis since it conveniently interpreted by many as a metaphor.
Who is the person who started this enduring little saying "God inspired men to write the bible"? Exactly how does one make this statement about a text in which anybody who has seen god dies and cannot have therefore given evidence of such an event.Any person who makes this statement cannot do so from eyewitness vantage.You can claim that it is written by men inspired by god only on faith and not on weight of evidence.
So far we have a failure to come even vaguely close to BB theory.
You previously stated
Fossil records state that life existed on this planet as long ago as 3.5 billion years ago
How is this to be derived from the bible?
Also this
Tectonic shift and sedimentation show the relatively old age of the earth
As can be seen most of these are facts other items are widely accepted theories. Genesis in my opinion doesn't contradict any of these facts in general but it does so in specifics
Are you saying that the validity of the bible is apparent in the lack of contradiction with science? Yet there are contradictions as I have pointed out and there are further ones within the book of genesis as well as other biblical verses that show a distinct lack of understanding of the actual workings of the universe.That a book does not contradict something does not mean you can therefore use this as an arguement for a position.