Apostle,
Death can be taken, and explained with a literal reading of your bible
without it meaning literal death. I will try to explain my idea. You see, I don't like creationists who suggest that if there was a physical death of animals before Adam then Christ's suffering was meaningless - that is not true.
In Genesis it says that if Adam eats of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, he will die. He did not infact physically die immediately. This could mean that there was a spiritual death, and therefore, there could have been a biological death before Adam, of animals and also of, possibly - transitional species. Nevertheless, we can still read our bible relevantly literally, and see that when in the
New Testament it is stated that death came into the world by one man and was removed by one man (Christ), that it could have meant
spiritual death. Infact, that would still fit properly because we do still die a biological death, but Christ has now made it that our spiritual connection is now the Messiah. Furthermore, Christ being resurrected means that he has conquered death literally, but can you see how you can keep a literal interpretation and not necessarily come to the conclusion that if there was a biological death since the beginning, then Christ's efforts were of none-affect.
I do not like that thing the YEC's say, that being "if death was before Adam, Christianity means nothing". NOT true, hopefully this idea I came up with can show you that science can be reconciled with the bible. I am not saying you shouldn't take a YEC position, I am just trying to show that Christianity
will remain intact, YECism or no YECism.