|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Power of the New Intelligent Design... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9201 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Maybe you should learn the basics of the subject first. Then come back.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Tanytrum writes:
So all those chocolate-flavoured insect bars you devour every week don't count?
I only eat chocolate once or twice a year
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Taq writes:
I talking about the transition from pre-Cambrian biota to Cambrian biota. Most of the organisms that appeared in the Cambrian have no recognisable evolutionary ancestors in the pre-Cambrian. Can you tell us how the distribution of characteristics in pre-Cambrian life violates a nested hierarchy? To make matters worse for the theory of evolution, most of the Ediacaran biota became extinct. No wonder, then, that Richard Dawkins said,"The Cambrian strata of rocks, vintage about 600 million years [evolutionists are now dating the beginning of the Cambrian at about 530 million years], are the oldest in which we find most of the major invertebrate groups. And we find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history." How can all those missing links between pre-Cambrian and Cambrian possibly form a nested hierarchy?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Tanypteryx writes:
Your atheist fairy-tale, your pseudo-science and your lying rhetoric don't fool me. Sorry.
ALL the evidence supports the Theory of Evolution.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4451 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
Sludge writes: Tanypteryx writes:
Your atheist fairy-tale, your pseudo-science and your lying rhetoric don't fool me. Sorry. ALL the evidence supports the Theory of Evolution. And yet, ALL the evidence still supports the Theory of Evolution, and you have nothing but foolish Pedo Cult Bullshit.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 4.7 |
quote: Yes. They look just planted without evolutionary history. But looks are deceiving as is your taking the quote out of context. That's the way things looked but that is not the way it was if you had bothered to quote further. Lying for crackers, again, Dredge. Bad Altar Boy.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Taq writes:
Richard Dawkins said, Lack of fossil evidence does not make the nested hierarchy go away."The Cambrian strata of rocks, vintage about 600 million years [evolutionists are now dating the beginning of the Cambrian at about 530 million years], are the oldest in which we find most of the major invertebrate groups. And we find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history." Pray tell, how does "without any evolutionary history" amount to a nested hierarchy?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
ID 786
APauling666 writes: That is false. Wishful thinking on your part. Those lineages started in the ediacaran. You cannot show they are unrelated to phyla in pre-cambrian and cambrian radiations. Once again your Darwinoid fantasies are exposed. There is a MASSIVE gap between ediacaran and cambrian radiations that evolution can't (sensibly) explain away ... the predicted evolutionary links between ediacaran and cambrian are virtually non-existent ... "A series of dark, craggy pinnacles rises 80 metres above the grassy plains of Namibia. The peaks call to mind something ancient — the burial mounds of past civilizations or the tips of vast pyramids buried by the ages. The stone formations are indeed monuments of a faded empire, but not from anything hewn by human hands. They are pinnacle reefs, built by cyanobacteria on the shallow sea floor 543 million years ago, during a time known as the Ediacaran period. The ancient world occupied by these reefs was truly alien. The oceans held so little oxygen that modern fish would quickly founder and die there. A gooey mat of microbes covered the sea floor at the time, and on that blanket lived a variety of enigmatic animals whose bodies resembled thin, quilted pillows. Most were stationary, but a few meandered blindly over the slime, grazing on the microbes. Animal life at this point was simple, and there were no predators. But an evolutionary storm would soon upend this quiet world. Within several million years, this simple ecosystem would disappear, and give way to a world ruled by highly mobile animals that sported modern anatomical features. The Cambrian explosion, as it is called, produced arthropods with legs and compound eyes, worms with feathery gills and swift predators that could crush prey in tooth-rimmed jaws." What sparked the Cambrian explosion? | Nature
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
Useless claim and also false.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
sensei writes:
Ask Darwinoid scientists to explain something as simple as the evolution of the hollow fangs of venomous snakes, for example, and they're lost for a sensible response. While you bury your head, looking at data in mutations, you fail to take a moment to zoom out and see the bigger picture, where evolution predictions fail miserably. Ask them to explain how evolution produced the connection between said hollow fangsand the snake's venom glands ... again, no sensible response. Yet these scientists claim to "know' how evolution works. They're such bs-artists and con-men.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Atheists (and most of the scientific community) attribute magical powers to mindless molecules ... lifeless mud turned in human beings!! Wow!!!
Pure superstition .... masquerading as science.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined:
|
APauling666 writes:
FYI, I was never an altar boy. When I was ten, I applied to become one ... but when the "recruiting" nun asked me if I was willing to get up at 6am to serve at the early Mass, I said "No". That put an end to my altar-boy aspirations.
Bad Altar Boy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
All they will do, is saying "natural selection" did it, at some point in evolution history.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Exactly. Translated it means "We don't know"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 4.7 |
Are the two of you really saying that because we don’t know everything down in intricate detail that, then, we know nothing? And if we can’t show you specifically what proteins did exactly what in some ultra specific case then the reality of the event didn’t happen?
Are you two that intellectually dishonest? Is this another “lies for jesus” stance that makes creationists look so bad?Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024