|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1509 days) Posts: 2161 From: Cambridgeshire, UK. Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Independent Historical Corroboration for Biblical Events | |||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
You do, of course, realize that finding that the text of the Bible was in use and circulation at the expected time has nothing to do with proving the TRUTH of the Bible.
In addition, even if most historical and geographic events mentioned in the Bible were shown to have happened or exist, it still says NOTHING about the validity any of the Religious content of the Bible. On the other hand, there are many things mentioned in the Bible that simply cannot be confirmed and in fact, can pretty conclusively be shown to have NEVER happened. One good example is the flood. There is simply no evidence anywhere that there was ever a worldwide flood, certainly not within the last few million years. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Glad you found your way home.
Actually, there were many, many known and documented floods. So I don't doubt that whoever wrote that section of the Bible was familiar with flood stories. In addition, there are so many similarities with several of the other and older Flood Myths that it's very likely taken directly from one of them. But the big problem with the Flood and ARK story is that absolutely no part of it can stand up to any reasonable examination. No part of it. For me, the value to the Flood Myth is that it was a beautiful, simple story that would appeal to a pastoral community with parts that could be acted out by children to help instill a feeling of belonging and also pass on a political and social message. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Rich
I certainly see you as reasonable, at least so far, so let's give it a try. Instead of running through a whole bunch of ponderables, is it okay to do one at a time? I think we've covered the issue of a universal flood so I'll skip that one. What about the claim in the story about what animals were brought aboard? A few questions.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Rich
I think the key point, at least for me, is that the Flood and Noah's ARK simply NEVER happened, even on a much smaller scale. Even if you allow every single fact mentioned in the story to be modified, it still will not stand up. But that is only part of it. If it turns out that every geographic location, every city and town, every ruler, every battle mentioned in the Bible is real, that still says absolutely nothing about the validity of the religious message. If it could be shown that Jerico existed (as it has) and that the walls were torn down (not once but many, many times) and that the walls got torn down about the time Joshua (or even at exactly the time) was there, it still adds no credence to the tale of supernatural intevention. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Well, no. If you could prove that the Exodus happened, it would show that the Exodus happened. That's it. That's all. Nothing more. No divine intervention.
For the issue of the parting of the Red Sea to stand up as divine intervention you would first have to show that
It's a fable, a morality play. It was meant to instruct and to help keep the people together. That's all. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Sorry you feel that way.
But I think you miss the point. If all that you allege happens to be true, if you could show that the Exodus actually happened, it still does not show any divine intervention. That is the point. I will freely accept any statement that the Exodus happened simply because it doesn't matter. That a mass of Jews left Egypt? Okay. That they crossed the Red Sea? Okay. But that still does nothing to show divine intervention. I looked back through the thread though and could find no referneces to any evidence supporting the Exodus. But as I said, even if it were there, it would not support the Bible as a literal book. If it will make you feel any better, I'll try to find some referneces to the fortifications that were built along borders. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Well, I can't go back too far but I certainly studied about the Hittites when I was in high school. So I don't see why you say people disputed them.
But again, you have made no real points. The fact that places or even people that might have really existed (although some, such as Moses are certainly questionable) does not imply that real history is included. Have you ever read a novel that mentions people or places? The fact that those people or places existed does not imply that the story is factual. The problem with the Bible as History is that so many things it relates as having happened, simply did not. Others are so questionable that it is fairly certain that if they did happen, they did not happen as described in the Bible. Troy is mentioned in the Iliad. Troy exists. Apolo came down and for nine days shot first the mules and hounds, but later the people themselves.
Thus did he pray, and Apollo heard his prayer. He came down furious from the summits of Olympus, with his bow and his quiver upon his shoulder, and the arrows rattled on his back with the rage that trembled within him. He sat himself down away from the ships with a face as dark as night, and his silver bow rang death as he shot his arrow in the midst of them. First he smote their mules and their hounds, but presently he aimed his shafts at the people themselves, and all day long the pyres of the dead were burning. History? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The Creation Myth in Genesis is, well, a myth at best.
Well, the world-wide flood never happened. The Noah story is, at best, a gross exageration of a minor event. The Ark and the animals simply didn't happen as stated. It looks like the battle of Jerico, if it happened, did not happen when the Bible seems to say it did. The Exodus, if it happened, were at least one or two orders of magnitude smaller than the Bible seems to say. Those will do for starters. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Would you prefer the term Fiction?
If so, I will modify what was said in post 162 of this thread to read... "The Creation Fiction in Genesis is, well, a Fiction at best." All beter now? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
But it most certainly is. There are supernatural characters, anthropomorphic critters and all the traits of a good fiction.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
certainly. There are Anthropomorphic critters, supernatural beings, a story line, sudden creations, and even a love interest for the purient.
But the point is not whether it is called, myth, fiction, fable, saga, tale or story. The point is that there are enough historic events named in the bible that simply did not happen, did not happen as stated or did not happen when stated, that the Bible can not be relied on as a historical reference. That does not mean there is no historical value to the Bible. It does mean though that those instances where it is obviously wrong (for example the Creation (insert your prefered term) or the flood, or the tale of Noah and the Ark must be discounted. It means that the timelines, when seemingly wrong (Jerico) must be questioned. It means that the events that are totally uncorroborated like the Exodus story must be set aside as only tales until some additional information is found that might provide independant confirmation. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
pointing towards the folk over at AIG. There is little there that most folk here haven't read and laughed about.
But there is no evidence there of a world wide flood. And as to how sediment gets from below sea level to the tops of the highest mountains, you'll have a VERY hard time convincing someone who's been through a couple earthquakes that it is not from the mountains being shoved up. There is a whole thread, several in fact, dealing with the Exodus myth. TThere is even a section on the flood myth so wander over there. But there is no evidence at AIG. And so far, no one has brought any information to support either the flood or the silly Noah story, but feel free to give it a try in the appropriate thread or forum. But back on topic, I repeat, there are just to many historical incidents in the Bible that are simply wrong to place any trust in it without lots of outside corroboration. If you can provide some, we wouold all like to see it. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Steve
Do you really not understand? You do not Prove a negative. The proof that the flood never happened is that there is NO EVIDENCE THAT IT DID HAPPEN. The way it works is that if you make and assertion such as "There was a world-wide flood" you MUST present evidence that it did happen. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
You are right. The change from sediment to sedimentary rock takes time. It has taken millions of years. What's to prove. There has been thousands of millions of years for it to happen.
You ask...
why do you want more evidence that the flood happened? and the answer is that so far you have provided NO evidence. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Steve
You made an assertion. The assertion is that there was a global flood. That is simply an assertion until you can present something to support the assertion. When you have some evidence that there was a flood, bring it here. Then we can go on. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024