Independent Historical Corroboration for Biblical Events

I think that some individuals may not bother responding to other individual posters as they figure no real communication is taking place. That is a mild form of "running away" and I have chosen that path in some cases.However, I would distinguish that from not bothering to answer *anyone's* questions. Which is more of a real running away. I don't remember any obvious case of a "non-believer" (for want of a better term) doing that.

Welcome to EvCforum.Brian will not be around too much until next week.However the adobe link at the site doesn't work.In addtion it is not clear how that site answers Brian's points. In general you should use a link as back up for your own words not as the whole answer.You might want to read the forum guideline before you carry on.

You need to show some evidence for the flood. You also need to explain the evidence that strongly suggests it did not happen.Go to this topic and explain the fossil ordering.
Fossil sorting for simpleNo one has managed that yet. Maybe you can.Just to help you catch up I'll summarize the issue:The fossil order (nothing to do with absolute dates but that can be added in later) is not one of a chaotic flood, it is not one resuting on body size, density, speed or intelligence. It is not what one that results from [i]andy[/b] of the crazy suggestions that the creationists make to explain it.It covers both animals and plants.You have to explain the whole darn thing. It was this evidence that convinced creationists two centuries ago that the flood could NOT be responsible for the earth's geology. The flood did not happen.You should NOT respond here. Take it to that thread.Note that ignoring this, as so many others have done, strongly suggests that you have no argument that can stand up.This message has been edited by NosyNed, 06-21-2004 12:19 AM