Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Nature of Scientific Inquiry - Contrasted with Creation "Science"
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6527 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 6 of 265 (125476)
07-18-2004 4:03 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by CK
07-18-2004 3:05 PM


Re: some clean up
Yes.
Intelligent Design was refuted in journals.
This site has an overview of the theory as well as a pretty comprehensive list of papers, and books refuting the psudoscience.
intelligent design - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by CK, posted 07-18-2004 3:05 PM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by NosyNed, posted 07-18-2004 4:17 PM Yaro has replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6527 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 8 of 265 (125482)
07-18-2004 4:28 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by NosyNed
07-18-2004 4:17 PM


Well, ID was touted by creation scientists. Still is. And History of the conflict between evolution and creation science Lists it as part of the evolution/creation debate.
Otherwise, there is a reason most, if not all, creationist work is not accepted in mainstream scientific jurnals. Mainly, because it does not meet up with the standards of science. i.e. the scientific method.
If you can't cross that basic line, then your stuff is going nowhere, period.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by NosyNed, posted 07-18-2004 4:17 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024