Robert Byers writes:
When we say evolutionary subjects aren't testablewe mean about all the great and numerous conclusions not bits and pieces.
But the conclusions are based on the tests of "bits and pieces", so this makes no sense.
Robert Byers writes:
HOwever it is progress to see that tests are essential for evolution to claim to be scientific.
Your kidding right? Have you not read a single thing that has been written previously just in this thread (let alone all the other discussions on other threads as well)?
™ Version 4.2
