EvC Forum: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry - Contrasted with Creation "Science"

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry - Contrasted with Creation "Science"

entwine

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 205 of 265 (132661)
08-11-2004 3:05 AM

Reply to: Message 48 by jt
07-20-2004 4:08 PM

Actually, the only proof most scientist will accept that evolution is wrong is 1) aliens landing and telling us they are our daddies (which would just start the the thread of who were their daddies), or 2) God coming down and telling us of our creation. Scientific method has to be applied to all other circumstances precluding the above two. Faith isn't challenged by science, only ignorance.

forgot about 3) creation of a time machine where a scientist can go back and see what happened. But I imagine that will be subject to scrutiny as to which time-line that scientist actually visited.

This message has been edited by entwine, 08-11-2004 02:12 AM

This message has been edited by entwine, 08-11-2004 04:32 AM

What is, is or it wouldn't be...

This message is a reply to:
	Message 48 by jt, posted 07-20-2004 4:08 PM		jt has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 206 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-11-2004 3:18 AM		entwine has replied

entwine

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 207 of 265 (132672)
08-11-2004 3:34 AM

Reply to: Message 179 by jt
08-10-2004 9:03 PM

JT writes:

I have seen enough evidence to convince me that naturalistic processes couldn't have produced life

There is much more to the universe than life as we know it. And it is from this "much more" that we find most of our answers.

This message has been edited by entwine, 08-11-2004 04:31 AM

What is, is or it wouldn't be...

This message is a reply to:
	Message 179 by jt, posted 08-10-2004 9:03 PM		jt has not replied

entwine

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 208 of 265 (132674)
08-11-2004 3:38 AM

Reply to: Message 206 by Minnemooseus
08-11-2004 3:18 AM

Re: The creation or the Biblical story of the creation?

minnemooseus writes:

which is the source of the most information. Looking at the creation, or looking at the Biblical story of the creation?

Looking at what is...

This message has been edited by entwine, 08-11-2004 04:31 AM

What is, is or it wouldn't be...

This message is a reply to:
	Message 206 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-11-2004 3:18 AM		Minnemooseus has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

1 online now:	PaulK
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/1