Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Insect diversity falsifies the worldwide flood.
edge
Member (Idle past 1736 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 3 of 148 (16281)
08-30-2002 1:34 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Tranquility Base
08-30-2002 12:50 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
^ I agree this is all very hard to imagine. If you want to treat it as a falsification, fine.
Is that all you have to say about this? Could you please explain why your model is superior to mainstream science which actually explains this phenomenon rather than just dismiss it as you have done?
quote:
However, there are so many features of the geo-column that suggest the Biblical flood that I will stick to that model. You haven't presented any such thing yet.
Another unsupported assertion. What are these features?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Tranquility Base, posted 08-30-2002 12:50 AM Tranquility Base has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Tranquility Base, posted 08-30-2002 1:59 AM edge has replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1736 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 8 of 148 (16306)
08-30-2002 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Tranquility Base
08-30-2002 1:59 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
^ The fact that you have to ask me again what we think is suggestive of the flood is why I will not answer. You tell me what you think we think. Then this is a useful discussion. I can tell you what I think you think. If you can't after 3 months of this then I am talking to a brick wall.
No, no, no. You just don't get it. Saying something is true does not make it true, no matter how many times you repeat it. We have tried to make this a meaningful discussion by pointing out the weak points in your arguments. We did this in the spirit of helping you understand the science of geology. You have simply not responded in most cases, and resorted to your 'hunches' in others. That leaves us with the only alternative that you accept our reservations regarding your theory. That is why we are amazed that you still adhere to it so adamantly. Please explain.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Tranquility Base, posted 08-30-2002 1:59 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024