Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What are the odds of God existing?
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 304 (307369)
04-28-2006 11:39 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Faith
04-28-2006 11:00 AM


Re: No reason for a god
I don't think we're capable of imagining anything at all without a causal agent, so that something or someone's always existing is just as problematic to me as something's coming into existence out of nothing
What's standing in the way, logically, of something being eternal?
True, it cannot be visualized or imagined, but it can be thought in an abstract sense.

God does not "exist."---Paul Tillich, Christian theologian

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Faith, posted 04-28-2006 11:00 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Faith, posted 04-28-2006 11:48 AM robinrohan has replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 62 of 304 (307371)
04-28-2006 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by robinrohan
04-26-2006 9:05 PM


Fifty Fifty ain't that nifty?
Robin, your logic is quite apt.
I of course believe that God imagined us long before we were even coherent enough to imagine Him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by robinrohan, posted 04-26-2006 9:05 PM robinrohan has not replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 63 of 304 (307373)
04-28-2006 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by robinrohan
04-28-2006 11:01 AM


Re: No reason for a god
Chiroptera writes:
Except that perhaps some things can exist without a causal agent.
Yes, if eternal. Otherwise, something has to happen to get them into existence.
No, not necessarily. The time-line you are imagining as ordering causality is integral to the universe. The universe just is, whether that internal time-line is infinite or finite.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 11:01 AM robinrohan has not replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 64 of 304 (307374)
04-28-2006 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by sidelined
04-28-2006 10:00 AM


Will get back to this, I promise...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by sidelined, posted 04-28-2006 10:00 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by sidelined, posted 04-28-2006 12:47 PM cavediver has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 65 of 304 (307375)
04-28-2006 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by robinrohan
04-28-2006 11:39 AM


Re: No reason for a god
What's standing in the way, logically, of something being eternal?
Well, in the case of material things, the fact that we've never seen anything whatever that we couldn't impute a cause to.
{OK, sorry, not thinking. Not thinking ultimately enough. Life itself even we don't have a cause for. Atoms too for that matter.}
Mind or Being is something else. THAT, as I said, I can more easily think of as eternal.
This message has been edited by Faith, 04-28-2006 11:52 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 11:39 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 12:00 PM Faith has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 304 (307377)
04-28-2006 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by robinrohan
04-28-2006 11:01 AM


Re: No reason for a god
quote:
Yes, if eternal. Otherwise, something has to happen to get them into existence.
Perhaps. But that has not been demonstrated. It is possible that there is something (and that something might be the universe in which we live) that has only existed for a finite time, but has come to exist without a causal agent.

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 11:01 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 12:03 PM Chiroptera has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 304 (307378)
04-28-2006 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by Faith
04-28-2006 11:10 AM


And, of course, if one believes (as I am sure you do) that one has good evidence that there is a god, then the probability increases to be greater than 1/2.

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Faith, posted 04-28-2006 11:10 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Faith, posted 04-28-2006 12:02 PM Chiroptera has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 304 (307379)
04-28-2006 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Faith
04-28-2006 11:48 AM


Re: No reason for a god
Well, in the case of material things, the fact that we've never seen anything whatever that we couldn't impute a cause to.
What I meant was, what is standing logically in the way of something or someone not being eternal?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Faith, posted 04-28-2006 11:48 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Chiroptera, posted 04-28-2006 12:02 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 74 by Faith, posted 04-28-2006 12:08 PM robinrohan has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 69 of 304 (307380)
04-28-2006 12:02 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Chiroptera
04-28-2006 11:59 AM


And, of course, if one believes (as I am sure you do) that one has good evidence that there is a god, then the probability increases to be greater than 1/2.
Not in the context of this logic problem. It's not the kind of evidence that could be plugged into this problem.
Outside of this problem of course, I know the answer already. God is self-existent, beginningless and endless, and He made everything else.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Chiroptera, posted 04-28-2006 11:59 AM Chiroptera has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 70 of 304 (307381)
04-28-2006 12:02 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by robinrohan
04-28-2006 12:00 PM


Re: No reason for a god
What is standing logically in the way of something coming into existence without a causal agent?

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 12:00 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 71 of 304 (307382)
04-28-2006 12:03 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Chiroptera
04-28-2006 11:57 AM


Re: No reason for a god
It is possible that there is something (and that something might be the universe in which we live) that has only existed for a finite time, but has come to exist without a causal agent
No, it's not possible. Of course, if one wishes to think romantically, then anything is possible.

God does not "exist."---Paul Tillich, Christian theologian

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Chiroptera, posted 04-28-2006 11:57 AM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Chiroptera, posted 04-28-2006 12:04 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 73 by cavediver, posted 04-28-2006 12:07 PM robinrohan has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 72 of 304 (307383)
04-28-2006 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by robinrohan
04-28-2006 12:03 PM


Re: No reason for a god
quote:
No, it's not possible.
That still has not yet been proven or demonstrated.

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 12:03 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 12:14 PM Chiroptera has replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 73 of 304 (307387)
04-28-2006 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by robinrohan
04-28-2006 12:03 PM


Re: No reason for a god
No, it's not possible.
Yes it is

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 12:03 PM robinrohan has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 74 of 304 (307388)
04-28-2006 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by robinrohan
04-28-2006 12:00 PM


Re: No reason for a god
What I meant was, what is standing logically in the way of something or someone not being eternal?
I can't grapple with that for some reason. It sounds meaningless to me that nothing is "standing in the way of" something's being eternal. I don't get it.
And there are things we know are not eternal, right? So something is logically standing in the way of THEM not being eternal. My impulsive answer was that we know them to have a cause, implying that all things have a cause. Or maybe I mean a beginning.
But I've been here too long and can't think straight any more, getting punchy, must go away for a while.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by robinrohan, posted 04-28-2006 12:00 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 304 (307391)
04-28-2006 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Chiroptera
04-28-2006 12:04 PM


Re: No reason for a god
That still has not yet been proven or demonstrated.
What we have to do, in order to get anywhere, is to take logic as a given. The universe is this thing that exists. If it came into existence, then that was a happening. If there was nothing to get this happening going, then it would never have happened. If there was nothing, there would still be nothing. So there had to always be something (or someone).
This seems as plain to me as 2 plus 2 make 4.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Chiroptera, posted 04-28-2006 12:04 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by cavediver, posted 04-28-2006 12:21 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 78 by Chiroptera, posted 04-28-2006 12:27 PM robinrohan has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024