General discussion of moderation procedures - Part οκτώ

Jar has contended:

quote:

---

Sorry but calling nwr dishonest was uncalled for.

---

The big question for Jar is:Was I calling NWR dishonest or was I simply saying that that certain sentence of his was?Nwr is not a "This".Nwr said:

quote:

---

People have been answering your question. You just don't like the answers they are giving.

---

I replied:

quote:

---

This is incorrect, dishonest and unsupported.

---

I was not demeaning the person; I dismissed the sentence.And just a note for NWR. My other remark was purely in jest. I have to remember that can't be seen through a monitor.The only reason I posted this easy rebuttal was because I don't need a scolding. But since it pleased Jar I accepted the situation.

Yeah, ok

My posts are rarely off topic however,I've noticed that the moderation of topics is really getting out of hand. Posts are scanned and hit with off-topic signs too often, constantly.When does a fruitful discussion strictly stay on topic? Let it go if a conversation strays a bit; let people keep themselves in check a bit.I feel all of the current moderators should be banned with the exception of Admin Modulous and Percy of course.I do not want to discuss this with anyone here. The evidence is in the moderator's actions.
This motion should be seriously considered.Try to think a little better of ppl.Edited by -messenjah of one, : typo