Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Liberal's Pledge to Disheartened Conservatives ...by Michael Moore
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 16 of 161 (364856)
11-20-2006 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Taz
11-20-2006 12:36 AM


Re: Higher taxes will be due to BUSH
quote:
The other day I was driving home when I noticed the car in front of me had a sticker that said say no to tax state and federal.
If we have no federal taxes, how are we supposed to fund a military to take over the Middle East for the oil companies?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Taz, posted 11-20-2006 12:36 AM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Taz, posted 11-20-2006 12:24 PM nator has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 17 of 161 (364909)
11-20-2006 12:24 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by nator
11-20-2006 9:07 AM


Re: Higher taxes will be due to BUSH
According to these conservatives that only want to lower taxes to 0%, supposedly it's magic money that grow on trees. On the one hand, they support a bigass army with the most advance and powerful weapons in the history of the world and on the other they don't want to pay for this bigass army with the most advance and powerful weapons in the history of the world. I swear, sometimes I wonder if more than half the country is under some kind of "stupid" spell.

Place yourself on the map at http://www.frappr.com/evc
The thread about this map can be found here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by nator, posted 11-20-2006 9:07 AM nator has not replied

  
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6138 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 18 of 161 (364988)
11-20-2006 6:34 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by crashfrog
11-19-2006 3:31 PM


Vying for bin Laden's Endorsement
Of course, then Republicans came to power, and victory speeches were all about how the nation had narrowly dodged a bullet by not electing the Al-Queda candidates, how it was clearly God's divine will than a Republican won the race, and it was the dawn of an enduring epoch of Republican control of all three branches of government.
I remember more of this type of behaviour coming from the 2004 campaign than I did this most recent one; with a few annoying exceptions. It was a reprehensible ploy and I'm making no excuses for it, but that's not the topic.
I actually think this is a refreshing change. I don't see that Michael Moore is under any obligation to win gracefully; he's a private citizen not a public candidate. I think he's showing a lot more restraint than conservative pundits did in the past.
I agree that he is free to say whatever he wants to say, but MM is one of the country's premier public flame-warriors and I see no cause to regard him as anything other than the kind of scum that scum wipes off the bottom of their shoes. The fact that gutter-flotsam exists on all sides of the political fence doesn't make me like the taste of his brand better than that of anyone else.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by crashfrog, posted 11-19-2006 3:31 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Chiroptera, posted 11-20-2006 6:45 PM Wepwawet has replied

  
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6138 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 19 of 161 (364991)
11-20-2006 6:42 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by nator
11-19-2006 6:59 PM


But they were puritanical war-profiteers.
Their record and angenda speaks for itsself.
Really?
There isn't even a possibility that they could be incompetents guided by high ideals? Or perhaps good people who made bad decisions? Or even real statesmen who just happen to disagree with you?
It's exactly this kind of automatic demonization of the opposition that has split our country to the point that we can't even agree that stoning little girls for being raped is wrong. If you don't show a little respect for the opinions of others then don't expect any for yours.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by nator, posted 11-19-2006 6:59 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Chiroptera, posted 11-20-2006 6:49 PM Wepwawet has replied
 Message 31 by nator, posted 11-21-2006 7:53 AM Wepwawet has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 161 (364993)
11-20-2006 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Wepwawet
11-20-2006 6:34 PM


Re: Vying for bin Laden's Endorsement
quote:
...MM is one of the country's premier public flame-warriors and I see no cause to regard him as anything other than the kind of scum that scum wipes off the bottom of their shoes.
Actually, I find Moore to be too timid in his wit. Gore Vidal and Noam Chomsky are my favorite "flame warriors". If you don't like them, then don't read them. Problem solved.

Kings were put to death long before 21 January 1793. But regicides of earlier times and their followers were interested in attacking the person, not the principle, of the king. They wanted another king, and that was all. It never occurred to them that the throne could remain empty forever. -- Albert Camus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 6:34 PM Wepwawet has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 7:14 PM Chiroptera has not replied
 Message 51 by Silent H, posted 11-22-2006 5:44 AM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 161 (364994)
11-20-2006 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Wepwawet
11-20-2006 6:42 PM


quote:
There isn't even a possibility that they could be incompetents guided by high ideals?
That's a possibility, but not a very likely one.
-
quote:
Or perhaps good people who made bad decisions?
Even less likely.
-
quote:
Or even real statesmen who just happen to disagree with you?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
No.
-
quote:
It's exactly this kind of automatic demonization of the opposition that has split our country to the point that we can't even agree that stoning little girls for being raped is wrong.
Huh? Is this a thread that I missed?
-
quote:
If you don't show a little respect for the opinions of others then don't expect any for yours.
Hell, I'm a communist. I learned long ago not to expect any respect for my opinions. I'm also not a Christian, so I'm under no obligation to "turn the other cheek".

Kings were put to death long before 21 January 1793. But regicides of earlier times and their followers were interested in attacking the person, not the principle, of the king. They wanted another king, and that was all. It never occurred to them that the throne could remain empty forever. -- Albert Camus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 6:42 PM Wepwawet has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 7:37 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6138 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 22 of 161 (364996)
11-20-2006 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by RAZD
11-19-2006 8:25 PM


At some point the dems will realize that they will now be held responsible and get to catch all the blame for the next two years.
Pardon me if I find this particularly funny. The republicans have been blaming the democrats for everything for so long that when they had the full run of all branches and STILL messed up, they STILL look to blame the democrats.
I guess we must live in alternate universes. The results of the last election made it clear to me that the republicans have caught the lion's share of the blame. I'm sure they would have been happy to rub it off on the democrats if they could.
The question is whether you will recognize it as a hit or yell foul eh? If they hold the administration responsible for their profligate, war-mongering, uncontrolled and unmanaged overspending, forces them to come to grips with financing their massive mistake ... republicans will howl that the democrats are raising taxes yes? The reality is that the Botch administration has ALREADY raised taxes - AND SPENT IT, they just don't have the GUTS to fess up to it.
At some point the republicans will realize that they need to be held responsible and get to catch all the blame for the last six years.
Who cares what I acknowledge? The answer to these questions is delivered by the voting public. But it seems there's a large contingent of democrats who are more concerned with holding an inquisition and subsequent auto de fe than they are with actual fixing our broken government.
Does the name calling actually fix anything? Come on RAZD. I have a high opinion of you as a person with better than average powers of reason. We're living in a country where we seem to be performing a perverse type of natural selection on politicians that will result in a new species of hyper-successful insult comic. Can't we do better than that?

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by RAZD, posted 11-19-2006 8:25 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by RAZD, posted 11-20-2006 9:19 PM Wepwawet has replied

  
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6138 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 23 of 161 (364998)
11-20-2006 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by jar
11-19-2006 9:02 PM


Re: Higher taxes will be due to BUSH
And at some point the Republicans will be held responsible for the higher taxes caused by the BUSH debt, misuse of resources and spending spree.
What sort of responsibility falls on the republicans alone? We'll all be held responsible and we'll either face the fact that the well has a bottom or we'll suffer an economic collapse. At that point there won't be just one party to blame, there'll be two. Unless of course (as I said) the dems (or anyone else really) decide to step up and put us on a responsible path.
The dems have their opportunity...like I said: let's see what they can make of it before we decide they're superior to dubya and his buddies. From where I sit I don't see much difference.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by jar, posted 11-19-2006 9:02 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by jar, posted 11-20-2006 7:21 PM Wepwawet has replied

  
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6138 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 24 of 161 (365001)
11-20-2006 7:14 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Chiroptera
11-20-2006 6:45 PM


Re: Vying for bin Laden's Endorsement
Actually, I find Moore to be too timid in his wit. Gore Vidal and Noam Chomsky are my favorite "flame warriors". If you don't like them, then don't read them. Problem solved.
Volume and vindictiveness go farther in a flame war than wit. Moore brings plenty of the former and none of the latter. I'll agree with you about Vidal and Chomsky, but it seems they don't have a lot of the popularity that the bomb-throwers like Moore and Coulter have. Nowadays it seems that polite discourse is a sign of weakness and listening is something the other side is supposed to do.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Chiroptera, posted 11-20-2006 6:45 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 25 of 161 (365005)
11-20-2006 7:21 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Wepwawet
11-20-2006 7:04 PM


Re: Higher taxes will be due to BUSH
What sort of responsibility falls on the republicans alone?
ALL of the responsibility for the huge debt run up for the Iraq fiasco, after all it was Bush & Company that presented the lies and data that Congress used to make decisions. It is the BUSH Debt. 100% Bush Debt.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 7:04 PM Wepwawet has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 7:43 PM jar has replied

  
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6138 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 26 of 161 (365009)
11-20-2006 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Chiroptera
11-20-2006 6:49 PM


Not even slightly possible?
That's a possibility, but not a very likely one....
Even less likely...
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
No.
-
There's an old saying: Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence.
I'm not gonna sit here and tell you dubya's a good president, but I don't think he's evil incarnate either.
Huh? Is this a thread that I missed?
No...just a personal pet peeve. The Taliban and similar religious nutjobs need to be crushed. Respecting their diversity is the same thing as throwing the stones. I'm a tolerant person but I would rather see dead murderers than more victims. Iraq may be the wrong war, but we're there. The day they stone a rape victim or hang a 14 year old for being gay is the day I'll know we lost not only the war, but our very soul. You think Bush is evil...open your eyes.
Hell, I'm a communist. I learned long ago not to expect any respect for my opinions. I'm also not a Christian, so I'm under no obligation to "turn the other cheek".
I didn't ask you to turn the other cheek...I asked you to stop slapping...there is a difference.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Chiroptera, posted 11-20-2006 6:49 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Chiroptera, posted 11-20-2006 7:50 PM Wepwawet has replied

  
Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6138 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 27 of 161 (365012)
11-20-2006 7:43 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by jar
11-20-2006 7:21 PM


Re: Higher taxes will be due to BUSH
What sort of responsibility falls on the republicans alone?
ALL of the responsibility for the huge debt run up for the Iraq fiasco, after all it was Bush & Company that presented the lies and data that Congress used to make decisions. It is the BUSH Debt. 100% Bush Debt.
The same lies and data that the democratic administration believed before Bush you mean? If it's that bad let's get the impeachment underway and let's see the evidence. Otherwise we might as well be a bunch of creationists believing what we're told.
I don't think history will let the Bush administration off the hook for Iraq, but those books aren't written yet. We'll have to see. In the meantime we're all sitting around the table hoping someone else picks up the check. Congress has authorized the expenditures made. It is our debt and bitching about who ordered the lobster ain't gonna change it.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by jar, posted 11-20-2006 7:21 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by jar, posted 11-20-2006 8:05 PM Wepwawet has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 161 (365014)
11-20-2006 7:50 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Wepwawet
11-20-2006 7:37 PM


Re: Not even slightly possible?
quote:
The Taliban and similar religious nutjobs need to be crushed.
And the US did. The US crushed the Taliban and similar religious nutjobs. And they were replaced by people who are now doing exactly the same thing. The US managed to liberate...Kabul. Kind of. And now people in the US government involved in Aghanistan are admitting (in whispers right now) that military force isn't working out too well, and eventually we are going to have to accept and make deals with...the Taliban. So what did Bush accomplish exactly?
-
quote:
I'm a tolerant person but I would rather see dead murderers than more victims.
And now we have both! We have dead murderers and more victims. Some of these victims were killed by US forces. And the dead murders are being replaced by more murderers. What is being accomplished?
-
quote:
The day they stone a rape victim or hang a 14 year old for being gay is the day I'll know we lost not only the war, but our very soul.
The war was a loser from the start then. There is no way this kind of war is going to prevent stoning rape victims or hanging 14 year old gay boys. The way we lose our souls is when we constantly advocate for policies that are known from the beginning to ineffectual, show through practice to be counter-productive, and advocate continuing the same policies that are themselves killing lots of innocent people.

Kings were put to death long before 21 January 1793. But regicides of earlier times and their followers were interested in attacking the person, not the principle, of the king. They wanted another king, and that was all. It never occurred to them that the throne could remain empty forever. -- Albert Camus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 7:37 PM Wepwawet has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Wepwawet, posted 11-21-2006 6:32 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 29 of 161 (365020)
11-20-2006 8:05 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Wepwawet
11-20-2006 7:43 PM


Re: Higher taxes will be due to BUSH
It is our debt and bitching about who ordered the lobster ain't gonna change it.
There is no doubt that all of us will have to pay for it but it was Bush that spent OUR money.
The same lies and data that the democratic administration believed before Bush you mean?
No, that is NOT what I mean. The lies only started after BUSH came to power, the lies used to justify invading Iraq.
The Iraq War so far has cost us over $340,000,000,000.00, (that is Brazillions for those that only understand BushMatheMatics), or about $3000.00 for each and every household in America. And the meter is still running.
We need to remind folk of this, not because of the financial burden that it places or to explain why the Democrats (or any honest Republican if we could ever find one again) but because the lies were obvious and the plan obviously flawed. The errors were glaring and only willful ignorance allowed the lies to believed.
We need to remind people of this so that in the future, I hope Americans will actually think abut what they are being told and NEVER allow what happened under the Bush Administration to go unchallenged.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 7:43 PM Wepwawet has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Wepwawet, posted 11-21-2006 6:46 PM jar has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 30 of 161 (365036)
11-20-2006 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Wepwawet
11-20-2006 6:56 PM


namecalling? or tough-love ...
I guess we must live in alternate universes. The results of the last election made it clear to me that the republicans have caught the lion's share of the blame.
The people blamed them. That is different from the GOPs blaming themselves. But there were still significant numbers of republicans that haven't seen that their party failed because their policies were faulty.
AND they have yet to publically recognize that it was their fault: their mistaken policies, their lack of oversight, their failure.
Who cares what I acknowledge?
Well then I don't need to wait two years to see if you think the Democrats "hit one out of the ballpark" as the goalposts have already been moved (to mix mangled metaphors).
Does the name calling actually fix anything?
quote:
prof·li·gate - adj.
1. Given over to dissipation; dissolute.
2. Recklessly wasteful; wildly extravagant.
warmongering - noun
a policy of advocating war [syn: war advocacy]
un·con·trolled - adj.
Not under control, discipline, or governance.
o”ver”spend - verb, -spent, -spend”ing.
1. to spend more than one can afford: Receiving a small inheritance, she began to overspend alarmingly.
2. to spend in excess of: He was overspending his yearly salary by several thousand dollars.
3. to spend beyond one's means (used reflexively): When the bills arrived, he realized he had foolishly overspent himself.
I'll give you "unmanaged" as a word creation to mean the failure (either by intent or by disregard) to manage:
quote:
man”age - verb, -aged, -ag”ing.
1. to bring about or succeed in accomplishing, sometimes despite difficulty or hardship: She managed to see the governor. How does she manage it on such a small income?
Are you saying these are not accurate descriptions of the Botch administration?
And if they are accurate descriptions (which I believe it is based on the evidence before me) then is it really name-calling or is it really just descriptive?
We're living in a country where we seem to be performing a perverse type of natural selection on politicians that will result in a new species of hyper-successful insult comic. Can't we do better than that?
The day we can't make fun of politicians is either a very good day or a very bad day. The first is highly unlikely, the second something to worry about.
But I agree that the problem is that people forget that they are supposed to laugh at those silly jokesters like Limbaugh and Colter and Hannity and ...
Sorry, but I'll take Jon Stewart any daily.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Wepwawet, posted 11-20-2006 6:56 PM Wepwawet has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Wepwawet, posted 11-21-2006 7:02 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024