Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homosexuality, the natural choice? (Gay Animals are Common)
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 144 of 306 (375789)
01-09-2007 11:35 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by Fosdick
01-09-2007 8:46 PM


Re: Gay "marriage" & gay genes
Hoot Mon writes:
If they had any grace at all they'd give it a break.
This going to be the third time I ask this question. Why is it that you people always say you support civil union for gay people yet always seem to try to pass legislations that not only ban gay marriage but also ALL forms of unions for gay people? The 2 or so dozen states that have an amendment banning gay marriage also ban all forms of legal unions for gay people.
That's why I support gay civil unions. Calling that "marriage," however, flies in the face of tradition.
Interracial marriage, not too long ago, flew in the face of tradition. A judge in Virginia in 1958 even said:
quote:
Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.
The couple on trial were sentenced to 1 year in prison for loving and marrying each other. Even though the sentence was later overturned and they were given a lighter sentence... banishment from Virginia, you can obviously see the hate that was involved in the matter.
Tradition? If you value the traditional sense of marriage that much, shouldn't you be out there picking on people like my cousin who married a Asian girl?
That's why I support gay civil unions.
But Hoot, every freakin state that has a gay marriage ban also has a ban on all forms of gay union that even remotely resemble marriage. Personally, I think you're just lying about supporting the civil union thing knowing it ain't gonna go anywhere anytime soon.

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Fosdick, posted 01-09-2007 8:46 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Fosdick, posted 01-10-2007 12:20 PM Taz has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 150 of 306 (375868)
01-10-2007 12:40 PM
Reply to: Message 148 by Fosdick
01-10-2007 12:20 PM


Re: Gay "marriage" & gay genes
You know that you have a gift for avoiding the point?

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Fosdick, posted 01-10-2007 12:20 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Fosdick, posted 01-10-2007 1:03 PM Taz has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 156 of 306 (375881)
01-10-2007 1:30 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Fosdick
01-10-2007 1:03 PM


Re: Gay "marriage" & gay genes
The reason I said you have a gift for avoiding the point is because the point is you have no real reason why you don't want gays to be married. You even showed us early on that you thought homosexuality could be treated like a disease and that "curing" homosexuality would solve everything.
You never had any valid reason why you don't like gays. You never had any valid reason why you don't want them to get married. You then proceeded with your bigotry (yes, just don't argue, it is bigotry) and tried to come up with one reason after another to justify your bigotry. You admitted that we shot you down with your tradition argument. You, then, proceeded to use the so-called "original intentions of the framers of the constitution" which we've shot down also. If we continue in this vein, I'm pretty sure we're going to start seeing things like "gays can't reproduce... gays have gay-pride parades... gays don't like women..."
If you simply say "I don't know why but I simply don't want them to get married..." I would have left you to your bigotry. My aunt used this same line and I haven't bothered her since.

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Fosdick, posted 01-10-2007 1:03 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Fosdick, posted 01-10-2007 2:08 PM Taz has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 161 of 306 (375895)
01-10-2007 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by Fosdick
01-10-2007 2:08 PM


Re: Gay "marriage" & gay genes
Hoot Mon writes:
Again, if the gays want to call themselves "married," that's OK with me. However, I don't think there needs to be laws for that, especially if civil-union rights are available to them.
What civil union rights? Memory problem?

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by Fosdick, posted 01-10-2007 2:08 PM Fosdick has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 162 of 306 (375898)
01-10-2007 2:32 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by New Cat's Eye
01-10-2007 2:28 PM


Re: 14th Amendment
CS writes:
Why not create a type of legal agreement that marriage would be a subset of and then let gays enjoy the benefits of the newly created type of legal agreement? This wouldn't be seperate from marriage as marriage would be a part of it (marriage would be one type of the agrement), and it also wouldn't change what marriage is.
Perhaps interracial couples would have been better off if they didn't seek out "marriage" and simply stayed with "civil union"?

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-10-2007 2:28 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-10-2007 2:37 PM Taz has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 167 of 306 (375909)
01-10-2007 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 164 by New Cat's Eye
01-10-2007 2:37 PM


Re: 14th Amendment
CS writes:
I can't fake being black like I could fake being gay.
Different words but same line of excuse made back in the old days.
If I am prejudiced against, say, people with no wisdom teeth, I'm sure I can come up with some excuse like the one you came up with to prevent them from getting dental insurance.

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-10-2007 2:37 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by Fosdick, posted 01-10-2007 2:53 PM Taz has not replied
 Message 180 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-10-2007 3:59 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 171 of 306 (375918)
01-10-2007 2:57 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by Dan Carroll
01-10-2007 2:55 PM


Re: 14th Amendment
Of course. The fact that he completely avoided the quote I provided regarding a judge's decision in interracial marriage should be telling enough. You know how sometimes you believe in something but you know people are going to jump all over you for it so you just try to change the subject or ignore it everytime it comes up?

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Dan Carroll, posted 01-10-2007 2:55 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by Dan Carroll, posted 01-10-2007 3:00 PM Taz has not replied
 Message 173 by Fosdick, posted 01-10-2007 3:07 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 246 of 306 (376212)
01-11-2007 12:47 PM


Got this from a friend a while back.
PRIDE = People Realizing Individuality and Diversity through Education

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

Replies to this message:
 Message 250 by Fosdick, posted 01-11-2007 1:02 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 249 of 306 (376217)
01-11-2007 1:00 PM
Reply to: Message 235 by Jaderis
01-11-2007 7:34 AM


Re: 14th Amendment
I have a friend whose parents are both gay. Both her father and mother were raised up to be conservative republicans. Her father was raised to be a good husband and her mother a good house wife. Some time after my friend was born, both her parents came to some kind of revelation and both came out. They are still living together and they each have a gay relationship out of marriage. And coincidently, they don't believe in god anymore.
Two points I want to make. For now they are faking their marriage just for the benefits. But the more important point is they were forced into this fake marriage by society, family, friends, and religion. They were taught that being gay was somehow wrong and all of that crap, so they had to grow up denying a very important part of their lives. Just imagine how miserable they were in their fake relationship before they decided to stop denying who they were.
I'm just glad they came to their senses and decided to exercise their constitutional rights of pursuit of happiness.

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by Jaderis, posted 01-11-2007 7:34 AM Jaderis has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by Fosdick, posted 01-11-2007 1:12 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 258 of 306 (376235)
01-11-2007 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 257 by Dan Carroll
01-11-2007 1:35 PM


Re: Homosexuals CAN be married?
That's why I stopped responding to him. My troll alert went red.

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by Dan Carroll, posted 01-11-2007 1:35 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 301 of 306 (376609)
01-12-2007 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 299 by Fosdick
01-12-2007 8:34 PM


Hoot Mon writes:
If civil union is effectively available to gays then they have a choice to be civially united, or not. But why should gays insist that "marriage" must legally apply to everybody who is civilly united or otherwise, whether or not he or she wants it to?
For the fourth time, every state that has a ban on gay marriage also has a ban on all forms of union that even remotely resemble marriage, and that includes your so-called civil union.
Why do gay people insist on marriage? Because they have been backed into a corner by all these laws that not only ban gay marriage but also any form of union that resemble marriage.

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by Fosdick, posted 01-12-2007 8:34 PM Fosdick has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 302 by RAZD, posted 01-12-2007 9:34 PM Taz has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 303 of 306 (376621)
01-12-2007 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 302 by RAZD
01-12-2007 9:34 PM


RAZD writes:
Think they might pass a law that removes all legal bias on marriage?
Huh?

AKA G.A.S.B.Y.
George Absolutely Stupid Bush the Younger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 302 by RAZD, posted 01-12-2007 9:34 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 304 by RAZD, posted 01-12-2007 9:44 PM Taz has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024