General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 9.0

Nope.You and Dan Carroll said anyone who does not agree with you are mentally ill.Why have you lied?Is it because that you know that the Mods will let you get away with it?Ray Edited by Herepton, : No reason given.

You are left with two choices:1. Admitor2. Lie some more and insult everyones intelligence.You should admit, PaulK.Ray

Straw man.Ray

Yes, that is exactly what he is saying. Take off your blinders and stop acting like you don't see or know it.Ray

You are mistaken; this was PaulK's opinion and to imply that disagreement with his opinion to be a sign of mental illness is irrational and a sign of mental illness or wickedness ("but I rather not consider that").Ray

The board is not better off with opposition to the status quo gone. Unless, of course, your ideology is third-world.Faith is gone because she made the "mistake" of giving you Darwinists a taste of your own medicine, which you could not handle. Unfortunately, I have not had the pleasure of acquainting myself with NJ's posts. Based on what is written above he has decided not to give you a taste of your own medicine.RayEdited by Herepton, : No reason given.

[colorization emphasis mine - Ray]The experts of history (Marx, Engels, Mao, Stalin, Hussein, Castro etc.etc.) all agree: censorship and banishment works.Ray

I agree that you cited "repeated forum violations" and never did I deny your stated reason, I, in fact, pasted your entire comment.Mao, Stalin and Hussein gave the same reasons for censorship and banishment (they violated rules/laws) when we know for a fact that the censorship was over "dangerous viewpoints."You have no point or ground to stand on. You are advocating third-world censorship of your Creationist opponents. We (= Creationists) only need to point out that our censors are Darwinists then all is explained.Ray

This comment acts like the author does not know that restriction to a certain forum which is labelled and touted as penal in nature is not censorship.We could only wonder if roles were reversed if the same author would retain this "view."However, I am not offended at all by being incarcerated in the Showcase Forum. Objective persons know the real reason why certain Creationists are sequestered by Darwinists.Ray

And it is being denied freedom to say it where everyone else has the freedom to say it.Ray

Good-honest anger.20th century atheist eastern European and southeast Asia regimes booted their opponents into oblivion and graves too. It appears education has not quenched the atheist mindset; Quetzal is simply advocating what atheists in current history have always advocated.Ray

Quetzal advocated that I be banned from posting on this board, which is equivalent to being "killed" (= unable to post).Ray

You are mistaken. Nobody said showcase had restrictions on speech; rather the same is a restriction on speech since inmates cannot have access to the same microphone as everyone else.Siberia is not Moscow.Ray

I never said what you have me saying. How is it that you have the ability to follow complicated scientific arguments in journals but cannot retain the lesser ability when the point is one you do not like? Misrepresenting the point = unable to refute.Ray

Would you retain the same belief if roles were reversed?Ray