Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lying For Jesus Award
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 151 of 279 (381691)
02-01-2007 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by Buzsaw
01-31-2007 9:55 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Hi Buz,
You're missing the point. Let me express it again differently.
Falwell the fundamentalist is a slimeball.
Coulter the Republican is a slimeball.
Hwang the scientist is a slimeball.
Of the three groups, fundamentalists, Republicans and scientists, only scientists seem capable of recognizing and calling out their own slimeballs. For another example, many scientists are pretty hard on Richard Dawkins for his militant stance against religious fundamentalism, some right to his face at the Beyond Belief 2006 conference that I'm watching now (I'm finally up to session 6).
It would be nice to see fellow fundamentalists say, "Brother Falwell, you have gone too far," or to see to fellow Republicans say, "Sister Coulter, you have gone too far," but it doesn't happen.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Buzsaw, posted 01-31-2007 9:55 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2007 8:01 PM Percy has replied
 Message 153 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 8:27 PM Percy has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 152 of 279 (381723)
02-01-2007 8:01 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Percy
02-01-2007 4:34 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
I'd much rather be called a slimeball than a liar. Imo, liar is a charge that should be backed up by the evidence given that it is charging one of deliberately stating a falsehood when one knows and believes it's a falsehood. Slimeball, on the other hand is a relative word as to ideology. I don't see him as a slimeball at all though there's stuff I take issue on regarding his position on some things. I respect your viewpoint regarding others. However when someone I regard as honorable is labeled a liar, I'd want to confront that person so as to allow for a defense of the serious charge.
I regard Jesse Jackson as a slimeball of sorts who exploits blacks but would not call him on a lie unless I had the goods. Thanks for clarification.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Percy, posted 02-01-2007 4:34 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by jar, posted 02-01-2007 8:30 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 162 by Percy, posted 02-01-2007 10:00 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5983 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 153 of 279 (381727)
02-01-2007 8:27 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Percy
02-01-2007 4:34 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
I find myself with Buz on this. Not that I am in love with Falwell et al, but that I would like to hear some specific charges of lying, to appease my ignorance if nothing else.
My opinion is that one's beliefs regarding Young Earth, Old Earth, and the like, are but beliefs. This is not to say that science has not proven anything, but that holding a position and even promoting a position opposed to science, is not lying. Lying requires a conscious effort to decieve. The belief that the other side is purposefully misinforming the public due to some underhanded self-serving conspiracy is common to both Christians and those against the Christian 'lies'. Both believe the other side is purposefully deceptive, when in reality, maybe neither are. The thread title may be more appropriately titled 'Willing to Wholeheartedly Believe Any Nonsense if it Promotes My Idea of Jesus Award'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Percy, posted 02-01-2007 4:34 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by ringo, posted 02-01-2007 9:06 PM anastasia has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 154 of 279 (381728)
02-01-2007 8:30 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by Buzsaw
02-01-2007 8:01 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Well Falwell is a LIAR. Big time liar.
The Bible is the inerrant ... word of the living God. It is absolutely infallible,without error in all matters pertaining to faith and practice, as well as in areas such as geography, science, history, etc.
-- Jerry Falwell, Finding Inner Peace and Strength
Dan Moldea, the lead investigator for Larry Flynt's ongoing quest to uncover sexual indiscretions of Republican congressional members, has now admitted he was hired by the law firm defending President Clinton.
-- Rev Jerry Falwell, from "The Bizarre Flynt-Clinton Connection," in the January 15, 1999, "Falwell Confidential" fax report to 162,000 members, referring to the firm Williams & Connolly. Dan Moldea responded, "This entire statement is false and misleading, reckless and malicious. It is a complete fabrication." However, the San Diego Union-Tribune picked up the fabrication and ran it as fact. Quoted from The Religious Freedom Coalition, "The Two faces of Jerry Falwell."
It is also obvious that he is supremely ignorant and actually willfully ignorant.
The idea that religion and politics don't mix was invented by the Devil to keep Christians from running their own country.
-- Rev Jerry Falwell, Sermon, July 4, 1976
We need to speak out against the Christian Cult of Ignorance a epitomized by the Evangelical, Pentecostal, Fundamentalist Televangelist and Pastor.
People like Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Ron Wyatt, Gene Scott are totally dishonorable.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2007 8:01 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2007 10:59 PM jar has replied
 Message 173 by johnfolton, posted 02-01-2007 11:03 PM jar has not replied
 Message 176 by purpledawn, posted 02-02-2007 8:18 AM jar has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 155 of 279 (381737)
02-01-2007 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by anastasia
02-01-2007 8:27 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
anastasia writes:
Lying requires a conscious effort to decieve.
You can water down the definition of a "lie" until almost nothing is a lie.
If you remember, the commandment is not against "a conscious effort to decieve", it's against "false witness". We are commanded not to spread falsehoods. It is our responsibility to determine to the best of our ability that something is true before we proclaim it.
Anybody who claims to believe in a young earth, for example, has not done that. The information is readily available to prove that claim false. Anybody who wilfully ignores it is bearing false witness.
"Belief" is no excuse.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 8:27 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:31 PM ringo has replied
 Message 158 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:42 PM ringo has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5983 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 156 of 279 (381755)
02-01-2007 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by ringo
02-01-2007 9:06 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Ringo writes:
Anybody who claims to believe in a young earth, for example, has not done that. The information is readily available to prove that claim false. Anybody who wilfully ignores it is bearing false witness.
Likewise, there is the belief that anyone who willfully ignores the evidence of the Bible is bearing false witness. The only way to truly combat this is to exhort people not to regard scientific evidence as falsifying the Bible, but as proving our own fallibility in understanding the Bible, and the hopelessness of attaching literal meaning to the words. On the other hand, what we think we know about science now, may one day be viewed as extremely insignificant or even wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by ringo, posted 02-01-2007 9:06 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 157 by kuresu, posted 02-01-2007 9:39 PM anastasia has replied
 Message 159 by ringo, posted 02-01-2007 9:47 PM anastasia has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2543 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 157 of 279 (381762)
02-01-2007 9:39 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by anastasia
02-01-2007 9:31 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
but at least the entirety of the scientific community recognizes that its findings and discoveries are tentative.
those who promote YEC and the GF tend to think of the bible in inerrant terms.

Question. Always Question.
" . . .and some nights I just pray to the god of sex and drugs and rock'n'roll"--meatloaf
Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:31 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:12 PM kuresu has not replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5983 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 158 of 279 (381764)
02-01-2007 9:42 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by ringo
02-01-2007 9:06 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Ringo writes:
You can water down the definition of a "lie" until almost nothing is a lie.
Or, you can understand the difference between a lie and being wrong about something. You can also believe someone else is wrong about something without calling them a liar, even wrong for believing what they believe. However if you want to say someone is 'wrong' for believing something, as in; a 'liar' it would be nice to know what evil they are doing by spreading these 'lies'. Whatever your notion of the word 'lie' it is a word that, in our language, denotes something said in malice.
Maybe not everyone is as picky as I am; when I argue with someone, I make a distinction. I do not shout 'you are a liar!' as has been done to me, but say, 'no, you are wrong'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by ringo, posted 02-01-2007 9:06 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by jar, posted 02-01-2007 9:52 PM anastasia has replied
 Message 161 by ringo, posted 02-01-2007 9:55 PM anastasia has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 159 of 279 (381771)
02-01-2007 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by anastasia
02-01-2007 9:31 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
anastasia writes:
Likewise, there is the belief that anyone who willfully ignores the evidence of the Bible is bearing false witness.
Not the same thing at all. When the Bible talks about "false witness" it is talking about real-world events. The "rules of evidence" are very similar to those in science - e.g. Leviticus required two witnesses (verification).
The only way to truly combat this is to exhort people not to regard scientific evidence as falsifying the Bible, but as proving our own fallibility in understanding the Bible, and the hopelessness of attaching literal meaning to the words.
Exactly. That means we have to speak out against interpretations of the Bible that are false - e.g. a young earth.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:31 PM anastasia has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 160 of 279 (381772)
02-01-2007 9:52 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by anastasia
02-01-2007 9:42 PM


They Lie for Money and Power. Jesus is just a patsy, a prop.
Or, you can understand the difference between a lie and being wrong about something. You can also believe someone else is wrong about something without calling them a liar, even wrong for believing what they believe.
See Message 158
Jerry Falwell is a LIAR.
However if you want to say someone is 'wrong' for believing something, as in; a 'liar' it would be nice to know what evil they are doing by spreading these 'lies'. Whatever your notion of the word 'lie' it is a word that, in our language, denotes something said in malice.
What's in it for Falwell and Robertson and Scott and Wyatt and Hovind and Hinn and almost EVERY Televangelist is money.
Money!!!!
and POWER!!!!!!!!
They know that the Evangelical, Pentecostal and Fundamentalist Christians are easy targets because they have been kept from learning how to think and trained to accept ANYTHING on Authority.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:42 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:36 PM jar has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 161 of 279 (381776)
02-01-2007 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by anastasia
02-01-2007 9:42 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
anastasia writes:
You can water down the definition of a "lie" until almost nothing is a lie.
Or, you can understand the difference between a lie and being wrong about something.
No. That's not what false witness means.
As I said, "believing" a lie is not an excuse for spreading it. Do your homework. If it has been falsified, shut the @#$% up. If you're not sure, shut the @#$% up. If you are sure and you repeat it and somebody calls you on it, shut the @#$% up.
Whoever fails all three of those tests is wilfully bearing false witness.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:42 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by anastasia, posted 02-01-2007 9:19 PM ringo has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 162 of 279 (381781)
02-01-2007 10:00 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by Buzsaw
02-01-2007 8:01 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Hi Buz,
You missed the point again. My change of terminology from "liar" to "slimeball" wasn't meant to be at all significant. Slimeball is more broad and inclusive, but by using it I didn't mean to imply that Falwell is not a liar.
My point concerns the reluctance of religious adherents and politicians to call out one of their own when they misbehave. Whether its a case of just not perceiving the wrong, or of perceiving the wrong but ignoring it, who knows. I'm just making the observation.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2007 8:01 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by Buzsaw, posted 02-01-2007 11:25 PM Percy has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5983 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 163 of 279 (381743)
02-01-2007 9:12 PM
Reply to: Message 157 by kuresu
02-01-2007 9:39 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
kuresu writes:
those who promote YEC and the GF tend to think of the bible in inerrant terms.
The Bible is more the data which is presumed correct, the interpretation is what many consider as innerant and beyond question. All of our interpretations should be regarded as tentative, and subject to change if and when new, conflicting data is presented. Only then can a code of 'questioning' really have meaning. I assume that the same is true for both myself and for you; we have not seen sufficient evidence about the existance/non existance of God to change our personal interpretations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by kuresu, posted 02-01-2007 9:39 PM kuresu has not replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5983 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 164 of 279 (381749)
02-01-2007 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 161 by ringo
02-01-2007 9:55 PM


Re: Falwell Lies For Jesus?
Ringo writes:
As I said, "believing" a lie is not an excuse for spreading it. Do your homework. If it has been falsified, shut the @#$% up. If you're not sure, shut the @#$% up. If you are sure and you repeat it and somebody calls you on it, shut the @#$% up.
So, if my sister calls 15 people and plans a party for my baby. whom she believes is about to celebrate a birthday, she has no excuse for her 'lie'? I am not talking about people who have evidence to the contrary, are not sure, or have been 'called' on it. I am talking about people who believe. Further, if my sister hears from another sister that she is wrong, she may still 'believe' she is right. In the end, party happens, based on a lie, but it does no harm for anyone involved. Sister is happy, baby is happy, and parents know the truth. Why can't you just be happy with knowing the truth?
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by ringo, posted 02-01-2007 9:55 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by ringo, posted 02-01-2007 9:53 PM anastasia has replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5983 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 165 of 279 (381759)
02-01-2007 9:36 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by jar
02-01-2007 9:52 PM


Re: They Lie for Money and Power. Jesus is just a patsy, a prop.
jar writes:
What's in it for Falwell and Robertson and Scott and Wyatt and Hovind and Hinn and almost EVERY Televangelist is money.
Money!!!!
and POWER!!!!!!!!
I believe that you will know a tree by its fruit. For those of us who regard money and power with little esteem, it is obvious that none of these liars are lying for Jesus, but for themselves. They are lying about Jesus, and to Jesus, but unfortunately any stance I can take to oppose this would be an attack on the person who violates MY idea of Jesus' teaching. Unfortunately again, everyone, almost without exception, including myself, violates my beliefs about Jesus' teachings in one way or another. I try to do my part to spread the teachings which I believe to be true in whatever ways present themselves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by jar, posted 02-01-2007 9:52 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024