|
Author
|
Topic: Radioactive carbon dating
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
Message 52 of 221 (396148)
04-18-2007 11:37 PM
|
|
|
Crashfrog, I wasn't talking to you when I blew up..I was talking to fallacycop...
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 56 by crashfrog, posted 04-18-2007 11:43 PM | | ArchArchitect has replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 57 of 221 (396156)
04-18-2007 11:45 PM
|
|
|
Helpful Carbon Dating Link
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 61 by crashfrog, posted 04-18-2007 11:50 PM | | ArchArchitect has replied | | | Message 76 by jar, posted 04-19-2007 12:13 AM | | ArchArchitect has replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 60 of 221 (396159)
04-18-2007 11:48 PM
|
Reply to: Message 56 by crashfrog
04-18-2007 11:43 PM
|
|
Exuse me crashfrog, but did you ask me anything about what I thought about physicists? No....fallacycop did..Why would I tell you what I thought about physicists if you were not the one to ask me? -So, if you're going to accuse me of something, include the whole truth. DO YOUR RESEARCH ON ALL OF THE COMMENTS.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 56 by crashfrog, posted 04-18-2007 11:43 PM | | crashfrog has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 64 by crashfrog, posted 04-18-2007 11:56 PM | | ArchArchitect has not replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 62 of 221 (396161)
04-18-2007 11:52 PM
|
|
|
We are past the quote -unquote "Bullshit" part of the conversation. We were past it a long time ago. So will you quit bringing it up?
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 63 of 221 (396162)
04-18-2007 11:56 PM
|
Reply to: Message 61 by crashfrog
04-18-2007 11:50 PM
|
|
Re: Helpful Carbon Dating Link
Can you scientifically prove that the flood did not happen? And it is not only a Biblical flood. It is all over the place. The flood is mentioned in the Koran, in Ancient Chinese Literature, and other places which I cannot name off the top of my head.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 61 by crashfrog, posted 04-18-2007 11:50 PM | | crashfrog has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 65 by crashfrog, posted 04-18-2007 11:59 PM | | ArchArchitect has replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 66 of 221 (396166)
04-19-2007 12:01 AM
|
|
|
Hey crashfrog, I found something interesting. You know what it is? It's a part of the statement I wrote. Here it is: "when you asked if he/she thought that physicists were stupid. And ofcourse I don't think that physicists are stupid. There are very smart ones out there, or the scientific world would not have been where it is today." You know what I notice about this? I mentioned physicists twice. We can all clearly see who the real liar is...
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 67 of 221 (396167)
04-19-2007 12:04 AM
|
Reply to: Message 65 by crashfrog
04-18-2007 11:59 PM
|
|
Re: Helpful Carbon Dating Link
Explain to me how it's been proven wrong.. You know, you're starting to sound like you're making this up as you go along..
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 65 by crashfrog, posted 04-18-2007 11:59 PM | | crashfrog has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 73 by fallacycop, posted 04-19-2007 12:07 AM | | ArchArchitect has not replied | | | Message 74 by crashfrog, posted 04-19-2007 12:08 AM | | ArchArchitect has not replied | | | Message 88 by JonF, posted 04-20-2007 11:15 AM | | ArchArchitect has not replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 72 of 221 (396173)
04-19-2007 12:07 AM
|
Reply to: Message 69 by crashfrog
04-19-2007 12:05 AM
|
|
THAT IS NOT THE MESSAGE I WAS TALKING ABOUT...
and if I was going to lie, I would at least make it a good one instead of lying to your face..
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 69 by crashfrog, posted 04-19-2007 12:05 AM | | crashfrog has not replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 75 of 221 (396176)
04-19-2007 12:11 AM
|
|
|
Are you telling me that this was a matter of miscommunication?! I was talking about that other message. And if I really am wrong, about Carbon Dating, then how is it my fault? wouldn't it be my science teacher's fault?
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 79 by fallacycop, posted 04-19-2007 12:17 AM | | ArchArchitect has not replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 78 of 221 (396180)
04-19-2007 12:16 AM
|
Reply to: Message 76 by jar
04-19-2007 12:13 AM
|
|
Re: Helpful Carbon Dating Link...NOT!
Why are you attacking the Creationists?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 76 by jar, posted 04-19-2007 12:13 AM | | jar has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 84 by jar, posted 04-19-2007 11:30 AM | | ArchArchitect has not replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 90 of 221 (396733)
04-21-2007 9:16 PM
|
|
|
Question:
I was wondering.. Is it a scientific, proven fact that temperature does not exist at sub-atomic levels, or is it an assumption. I do not understand how there can be temperature existance at a certain level, but not at a sub-level. Doesn't our level overlap the sub-atomic level? I'm confused, can somebody help?
~Thanks~
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 91 by Zhimbo, posted 04-21-2007 9:39 PM | | ArchArchitect has replied |
|
ArchArchitect
Member (Idle past 6210 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: 04-16-2007
|
|
|
Message 92 of 221 (396739)
04-21-2007 9:44 PM
|
Reply to: Message 91 by Zhimbo
04-21-2007 9:39 PM
|
|
Re: Question:
So then the amount of heat is directly proportional to the speed of the atoms?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 91 by Zhimbo, posted 04-21-2007 9:39 PM | | Zhimbo has replied |
|
™ Version 4.2