|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Junior Member (Idle past 5055 days) Posts: 18 From: Los Angeles,California,USA Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Radioactive carbon dating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
It's also wrong.
Look, the only reason they reject carbon dating is because it leads to conclusions that undermine their interpretation of the Bible. That's not a scientific reason. Furthermore they base their assumptions on a Biblical flood, which it is known did not happen. I don't see your link as being all that helpful, because it's scientifically inaccurate. It's bad information.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6209 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
We are past the quote -unquote "Bullshit" part of the conversation. We were past it a long time ago. So will you quit bringing it up?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6209 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Can you scientifically prove that the flood did not happen? And it is not only a Biblical flood. It is all over the place. The flood is mentioned in the Koran, in Ancient Chinese Literature, and other places which I cannot name off the top of my head.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Why would I tell you what I thought about physicists if you were not the one to ask me? You didn't, that I can see. The word "physicists" doesn't appear in that post to me, and none of the statements have anything to do with physics. The posts are numbered, here, if you hadn't noticed. You really need to keep better track of what you're saying to whom. Go back and read what you've written, if necessary. You're really starting to not make any sense at all.
Exuse me crashfrog Excuse yourself. Look, the posts say who they're in reply to. This post will show you which post of yours I'm replying to. Didn't you notice all that stuff that the board software puts in, automatically?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Can you scientifically prove that the flood did not happen? It already has been proven. Scientists haven't believed in the Biblical Flood for 200 years. Hell, it was creationists who originally rejected the flood story.
in Ancient Chinese Literature It's a different flood. It does flood in China, you know. Makes sense that they might have written about it. The flood isn't on-topic here, though.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6209 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Hey crashfrog, I found something interesting. You know what it is? It's a part of the statement I wrote. Here it is:
"when you asked if he/she thought that physicists were stupid. And ofcourse I don't think that physicists are stupid. There are very smart ones out there, or the scientific world would not have been where it is today." You know what I notice about this? I mentioned physicists twice. We can all clearly see who the real liar is...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6209 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Explain to me how it's been proven wrong.. You know, you're starting to sound like you're making this up as you go along..
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fallacycop Member (Idle past 5549 days) Posts: 692 From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil Joined: |
Hey crashfrog, I found something interesting. You know what it is? It's a part of the statement I wrote. Here it is:
But crash frog wasn`t replying to that post.
"when you asked if he/she thought that physicists were stupid. And ofcourse I don't think that physicists are stupid. There are very smart ones out there, or the scientific world would not have been where it is today." You know what I notice about this? I mentioned physicists twice. We can all clearly see who the real liar is...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
You know what it is? It's a part of the statement I wrote. In a completely different message than we were talking about. This is getting surreal.
We can all clearly see who the real liar is... Yeah, you. The text you quoted doesn't appear in the message we were talking about. Here it is, in it's entirety:
quote: See? It doesn't say anything about physicists.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3976 Joined: |
In my honest opinion, I'm not sure who is the greater babbler, Juraikken or ArchArchitect. And they seem to sort of bring the same sort of things out of others.
ArchArchitect, posting bare or essentially bare links (such as in message 57) is highly frowned upon in these parts (Forum rule 5) . Quote the relevant part and comment on same, and post the link. To the others - Please try to keep the replies to Juraikken and ArchArchitect down to a fewer but higher quality. If you don't find their message worthy of a reply, THEN DON'T REPLY. Otherwise I or another admin might have to resort to a mass suspension. I think we're trying to keep Juraikken and/or ArchArchitect out of the Showcase forum (aka "The Rubber Room"), whose discription is:
This forum hosts those with the most controversial or unusual viewpoints, giving them an opportunity to showcase their ideas in discussion with selected EvC Forum members. Featured luminaries are by invitation only. Participation by other EvC Forum members is by request only, and permission to participate can be revoked at any time People, let's strive for niceness and quality. Closing topic in 10 minutes, for a yet to be determined period. Adminnemooseus New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures Thread Reopen Requests Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], [thread=-17,-45], [thread=-19,-337], [thread=-14,-1073]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Juraikken Member (Idle past 6217 days) Posts: 82 From: Winnetka, CA Joined: |
cthulhu writes: Wouldn't matter. radiometric dating doesnt CARE if theres radioactivity around it? so why the heck is it called radiometric dating? "Radioactive decay is the process in which unstable atoms lose energy by emitting radiation in the form of particles or electromagnetic waves." so tell me, if there is radioactivity in the air and this carcass is releasing radioactivity, its not going to be MORE radioactively affected? lol they emitt radiation, and if theres more radiation in the air when it died, wouldnt that mean its MORE/LESS radioactively affected than it should be? how can you say it doesnt matter at all?
cthulhu writes: Wouldn't matter. the volcanic activity serves NO purpose at all to the body? if you were to fall in a volcano and millions of years later your bones be exposed to people, you think they woudlnt know at all that you were burned? sounds like science is fickle in that area
cthulhu writes: The Earth has had atmosphere for more or less its entire existence. not what big-bangists are saying, nor are what plenty of evolutionists are saying, some say at the beginning stages of Earths creation, there were NO atmosphere for a while
cthulhu writes: C-14 dating deals with proportion, not amount, so no matter. really? i thought that the c-14 dating actually has that carbon CLOCK running after the thing dies, so basically it IS amount really. mathematically the c-14 in it keeps going down until there are no more c-14 in the thing near 50,000 years. so....it falls apart there
cthulhu writes: How the hell could a disease affect radioactive decay? are not visualizing it? depending on the atmosphere and where he died, he coulda had a c-14 disease in his body that could have depleted the c-14 in his body before he died THUS giving it a LARGER age than its suppose to have... or it had eaten a ton of whatever he wants to eat right before he died making it seem YOUNGER than its suppose to be becuase he brought in him MORE c-14 to last longer.
cthulhu writes: How the hell would a magnetism affect radioactive decay? are you saying that during a magnetic shift NOTHING is going to die? lol. not true, during a magnetic shift plenty of animals die from the radioactive burst from the poles. now lets say this thing died because of that, are you to say WE as scientists wouldnt know this?
cthulhu writes: Ah, you don't know what radiometric dating is. It's not based on the amount of radioactivity. i admit i know little, but it is based on the amount of radioactivity so says my source Radiometric dating - Wikipedia decay of isotopes means the amount that is given off?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6209 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
THAT IS NOT THE MESSAGE I WAS TALKING ABOUT...
and if I was going to lie, I would at least make it a good one instead of lying to your face..
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fallacycop Member (Idle past 5549 days) Posts: 692 From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil Joined: |
You know, you're starting to sound like you're making this up as you go along.. And you are sounding like you don`t know the least thing about science. Go read some more and come back when you actually are ready
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Explain to me how it's been proven wrong.. Like I said, the Flood isn't the topic of this thread. Is this your admission, then, that your assertions about carbon dating were completely wrong?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6209 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Are you telling me that this was a matter of miscommunication?! I was talking about that other message. And if I really am wrong, about Carbon Dating, then how is it my fault? wouldn't it be my science teacher's fault?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024