Happy New Year Everyone
Dear Dr Adequate,
I believe that you are finally
starting to get the gist of what I am saying. You are quit correct in saying.
{What Evolutionist call}Transitional forms are always fully formed creatures .
This is the gist of my point. My point being “”fully formed’ creatures, by definition, are not transitional forms”.
I.E. you have life form ”A’ and life form ”B’. If life form ”A’ and life form ”B’ are fully formed where are the intermediates?; (the
transitional forms)
To say that life form ”B’ transitioned from life form ”A’ you must give some means by which this happened. For instance; if ”A1’, ”A2’, or ”A3’ are not viable then you’re never going to get to B.
You have to show the mean by which new organs come into existence. For instance water breathing fish gills are totally different organs from air breathing lungs. Each is designed for different purposes; each has highly specialized parts that make it work the way it does. Yes, some of the parts may be interchangeable, but not all. How do you explain ”New parts’ that are not, and could not have been, part of the original organ?
Adaptation (Micro-Evolution) only works for systems that are in place. I.E. A finch population’s (pre-existing) beak size and shape may vary over time to adjust to available food sources. However, this
adjustability does not explain how the bird got the beak in the first place.
To put it on a much simpler level, try to figure out what it would take to convert a Row Boat into a Model-T. O’ and don’t forget, you can’t use you brain to do this either. Remember, Evolution
supposedly did it with out an intelligent Designer.
. which must, in order to be ancestral to anything at all, be able to function in its environment.
Again, you’re starting to make sense here. So take this to its logical conclusion. Lets go to the genetic code. I do not have the exact figures right here in front of me, however, is it not true that errors in the genetic code are either ”Good’ ”Bad’ or ”Neutral’ (I.E. ”Good’ increasing the cells viability, ”Bad’ decreasing the cells viability, or ”Neutral’ make not difference in the cells viability) If memory serves me correctly the ”Bad’ errors out way the ”Good’ ones by something like 1,000 to 1.
So if this were a dace, and the objective of the dace was to get to point ”C’ from point ”A’ and you were at point ”B’ you would have to take a thousand steps back toward point ”A’ before taking one step forward toward point ”C’. How far, then, do you think you would progress to point ”C’?
Going back to the ”water breathing fish gills’ and the ”air breathing lungs’; if in fact a fish developed ”air breathing lungs’ there would have to be thousands, if not millions, of incremental steps each new generation would have to undergo before a fully formed ”air breathing lung’ became capable of actually filtering oxygen from the air. Each of these ”incremental steps’ would, in itself, not be viable and therefore would not have survived to pass on the new genetic information to continue the procession toward a new working organ (In this case a lug).
For God so greatly loved and dearly prized the world, that He [even] gave up His only begotten (unique) Son, that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him should not perish (come to destruction, be lost), but have eternal (everlasting) life.
For God did not sent the Son in to the world in order to judge (to reject, to condemn, to pass sentence on) the world, But that the world might find salvation and be made safe and sound through Him. John 3:16, 17 (Amplified Bible)
™ Version 4.2