Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   scientific theories taught as factual
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 7.6


Message 69 of 295 (446589)
01-06-2008 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by JRTjr
01-06-2008 4:58 PM


Re: differentiating between the observation and the theory
When I said that they “wouldn't be able to swim or to walk” I meant that before the fin became a viable leg it would make a poor fin; therefore the creature would neither be able to walk nor swim.
Sea turtles have fins which work quite well for swimming, and yet allow them to walk on land for brief periods.
Other turtles have fins that have developed proper feet, and can walk on land much better, yet can still swim effectively.
A "poor fin" or "poor leg" can still be "good enough" for a creature to survive long enough to reproduce, which is all that evolution requires. Nobody reasonably asks for a fish to suddenly spring a real leg that is fully useful on land. We expect intermediate forms, of which we have a large number of examples.

Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by JRTjr, posted 01-06-2008 4:58 PM JRTjr has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024