Why Would God Care?

Raphael And of course the response of a righteous God is to kill the innocent along with the guilty. Truly pulls at the heartstrings the level of love shown there. Small wonder people feel so drawn to it.

imageinvisible Yes if you cannot win by force of evidence it is always better to fall back on the Christian love ploy and threaten someone.

imageinvisible Not at all.The threat is only generated by the claims of writing from the dusty long dead dreams and agendas of people deceased before any inkling of modern understanding arrived in the consciousness of humanity. You have to wonder how it is that God never seems to be able to do these things for himself eh?
Hell the biggest detriment to any direction I would even begin to take towards such drivel would is nullified by the incessant pandering to such obvious human agendas and politics. What would an omnipotent omniscient God need with human efforts and articulations.
How odd it is that the claim that a God really exists is so vehemently backed by people with such ill conceived means of conviction and argument in their favour. And which of the literally thousands of different POV's concerning God and right action etc etc do you pretend to be able to tell me is correct at all?
Sorry, the greatest likelihood is not that God is a rational entity that exists but the workings of irrational people desperate for a father figure to take them away from the responsibility for and the acceptance of the facts of life. Funny how God seems to find it necessary to never deal in the first person for one excuse or another.
Did you catch the love reference in the same sentence with destruction? Ah, Christian love, you gotta fear it.

imageinvisible It is still men who do the talking and writing not God. God remains ,as always, silent. It is not possible to harden your heart against that which does not ,nor ever has, spoke to you. Or realize that it is a work of men ,faulty and barren of content, except in the context of the times when the supernatural was the explanation from people who knew nothing. But there is no ship sinking here. It is just the running wild of imagination over the long ago words of tribal people living without understanding of the forces about them. You assume much about without benefit of any real insight. In what way is consciousness flawed or not flawed? I fail to see how you make this claim with such arrogance. I will grant you that men do just such acts. They also tell truths , remain faithful, and give from their wealth to others without need of reward or fear of punishment. And they will do so without gain or recognition or financial reward. No doubt some men are this way. So what? The deeds of the few do not reflect that of all. The message is flawed and of little value. There is no good reason to accept this is true in the least. In my experience the facts are that there is no accountability brought to actions against a man except by other men. Again God is conspicuously absent. I doubt there is any measure taken against men after they die that matches this scenario you lay out. It is again the prose of ancient long dead people who have come and gone no longer to trouble the world or be troubled by it that bids your own writing to such troubled sentences. It must be difficult to deal with the world from your POV.
We are mortal and we have our moment in the sun and too soon it fades to waste time with such childish concerns over mortality and the fear of living much less dying.