scientific theories taught as factual

What does that have to do with the topic?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

It is not Chen that is the liar, and that is not a quote from Chen, and that has been pointed out to you several times in this thread.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

The point is that the newspaper article you quoted is obviously taking things out of content. It's not too unusual for writers to either make mistakes or misrepresent what the actual science is. The point, my friend, is that even 30 years before the news article we were beginning to find the very precursors Chen is talking about. Since then we have found many more including the main thing that Chen was concerned about, examples of bilateral life forms.For example, in 2004 Chen, the very person mentioned in your news article published his discovery of small bilateral fossils from 40 to 55 Million before the Cambrian.Note that, just the very things the article said were needed have been found.That is how science works.There is no problem.Now do you ever plan to post something related to the topic?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Actually, as I pointed out in Message 156 and others, Chen's opinion has changed as additional data has been found. So even Chen is quoted as showing that the precursors to what we see in the Cambrian goes back at least 40 million years before the Cambrian.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Can you show a scientific theory taught as fact?Chen is one of the folk that have shown that the precursors of what we see in the Cambrian arose over 40-55 MILLION years. That is NOT a sudden appearance so you can stop making that claim.Chen is NOT saying something different than is being taught.Now do you have anything related to the topic?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Regardless, you have been shown that Chen believes it was more like 40-55 Million years, so why do you continue to repeat known falsehoods? No, even if it were just 2-3 million years that would not show Darwin to be wrong. Why do you continue to repeat known falsehoods?Do you intend to ever present anything on topic or simply continue to post falsehoods and misrepresentations?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

I see you are pulling the classic Biblical Creationist tactic of pretending the past never happened.Do you ever plan on posting something related to the topic?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Yes, from postings here at EvC is does seem like the normal Biblical Cristian when given a choice between honesty and dishonesty chooses dishonesty.Now, do you have anything to post on the topic which is "scientific theories taught as factual" or are you simply going to continue to avoid addressing the issue?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Here is a list of over 90 fossil collections.Many of them even have searchable databases. The UT collection itself has records for 112,422 specimens in 4,450 localities.Enjoy.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!