Before you start arguing against something, you really should know what you are arguing against.
We really do not like equivocation here. oh I guess I better define. It is a logical fallacy.
Equivocation is the illegitimate switching of the meaning of a term during the reasoning.
You are switching the definition of Theory
In science a theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or events based upon proven hypotheses and verified multiple times by detached groups of researchers. (in other words, facts)
The biggest difference between a law and a theory is that a theory is much more complex and dynamic. A law describes a single action, whereas a theory explains an entire group of related phenomena.
Source
Scientific Theory, Law, and Hypothesis Explained | Wilstar.com
There is nothing higher than a Scientific Theory to explain a group of phenomena. You can't go any higher. Theories are the big leagues.
You see how that works. I include facts and sources with my statements. Not just random statements with no basis in reality and fact.
Show me the evidence where man has proven in a lab that a single cell life creature can evolve into a fully grown man?
Here we go with another fallacy. The tried and true always debunked and discredited creationist strawman. Where does the Theory of Evolution say this should happen. Give me one example of a believer in Evolution proposing anything like this could or should happen.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts.