Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Wingnuts Praying for Obama's Death
Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


(1)
Message 33 of 124 (547918)
02-23-2010 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Hyroglyphx
02-23-2010 5:08 PM


Re: Sad
I voted for Bush the first time 'round because I thought he was the lesser of two evils. During that first term my view took a left turn, and after not voting for Jorje in the 2004 election, wound up considering him a total buffoon by the end of his office.
I think most reasonable people would agree that no matter your political leanings (or lack thereof), an assassinated president does not a stable nation make. Did I hear of assassination threats to GW? Yes. Did I secretly wish they would come to fruition? Absolutely not. The threat of severe turmoil to national security, the economy, society and politics in general would be more than most reasonable people would prefer to experience. And I'll be honest: he wasn't that bad of a guy; just sort of an idjit.
There are those who are usually reasonable people (such as my father, currently) who think that it'd just be better if a sitting president was offed. I think these are folks who aren't especially adept at following a thought to its logical conclusion, and if pressed, would most likely back down.
But then there are those exceptionally unreasonable and irrational nut-jobs who would seriously, honestly dance a jig were Obama to be gunned down. And these are the folks I think the Secret Service watches for most closely.
I think this pastor deserves a private talk with the Secret Service. The First Amendment allows for anyone to voice any opinion he or she wishes to voice, as long as it is devoid of the type of speech which may incite violence. IMO, this pastor toes this line, if not steps over it.
Did you throw a hissy fit for President Bush's would-be assassins or was it no big deal to you?
Not to speak for hooah because I'm sure he can defend himself, but I think you may be pigeonholing him here. I think you're right in one respect: those who are vehemently anti-religion will zero in on any report of the religious engaging in hateful speech such as this (in the name of religion, no less), and more so if it's in reference to taking the life of a political figure you either a. voted for or b. just respect in general. But I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say that attempting to paint hooah in this light may be a bit of a misrepresentation.
However, I could also be full of shit.
Have a good one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-23-2010 5:08 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by dronestar, posted 02-25-2010 9:12 AM Apothecus has replied
 Message 37 by Taq, posted 02-25-2010 3:36 PM Apothecus has replied
 Message 117 by Apothecus, posted 03-09-2010 2:56 PM Apothecus has not replied

Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 36 of 124 (548101)
02-25-2010 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by dronestar
02-25-2010 9:12 AM


Re: Yeah, truly sad
Hey Dronester.
Dronester writes:
Apothecus writes:
And I'll be honest: he [Bush Jr.] wasn't that bad of a guy
Wow. Insert the sound of my head exploding. Again.
Touché.
Maybe "Idjit" was too tame. Would "Consarned Flea-bitten Anti-Intellectual S.O.B. A-hole Felonious Idjit" do it for you? Or something in between?
Sorry I misunderestimated your position.
Have a good one.

"My own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose. J.B.S Haldane 1892-1964

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by dronestar, posted 02-25-2010 9:12 AM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by dronestar, posted 02-25-2010 4:04 PM Apothecus has replied

Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 39 of 124 (548112)
02-25-2010 4:20 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Taq
02-25-2010 3:36 PM


Re: Sad
I've always thought that GWB would have made a great drinking buddy (and from the stories I have heard he was). So in that sense he wasn't a "bad guy". I doubt that any of us would want our drinking buddies to run the country.
From what I understand, Dubya gave up the booze when he "done got born agin'." But in college and early adulthood he evidently drank like it was going out of style, and would have left me and my drinking buddies in the dust. But in the interest of full disclosure, I can't say I never woke up in a pool of my own vomit after a night of college bingeing.
However, I never wished harm on the guy, still don't, and never will. That is why I find these anti-Obama wingnuts so distasteful.
Agreed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Taq, posted 02-25-2010 3:36 PM Taq has not replied

Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


(1)
Message 41 of 124 (548126)
02-25-2010 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by dronestar
02-25-2010 4:04 PM


Re: Yeah, truly sad
Hey Dronester.
Apothecus, although you only voted for Bush Jr. once, do YOU ever hear the screams your vote caused?
Wow. Just, wow.
I can understand why we should, when presented with facts such as those, feel dismayed and angry. I admit I've seen or read some of them and, to be honest, didn't really do a good enough job of internally personalizing these things, or at the least, didn't relate well enough to travesties committed against humans just like me to make these things real. At least not real enough to think about on a daily basis.
Do I think I should not have voted for GW in '00? Yes, in hindsight. Was I an informed voter? Yes, I think so. Did my view, as well as my political leanings change afterward? You bet your butt. Could anyone who voted for this imbecile have known these things would happen? C'mon.
So what you're saying is all those who voted for Bush in either election (and possibly regretted it) should feel daily, wracking guilt about these crimes, correct? Sorry, but that's not how most people work. Sure, these were terrible, terrible crimes, committed (or at least authorized) by a sitting president, but do I feel some personal responsibility for these crimes? Maybe in a vague sort of way, I guess. Do I hear the children's screams? Well, that's a bit ... dramatic. Sorry if that upsets you.
So was your intent just to bring to light facts which maybe some people aren't aware of, or might just like to sweep under the rug? If so, that's great. Thanks. But if your intent was to come off as a judgemental arse, well then ... "Mission accomplished!"
Thanks for the light-hearted reply and "have a nice day" wishes.
I assume the above was facetious at best, a *flame* veiled with sarcasm at worst, but to your credit, it took me a couple times reading your post to come to that conclusion. Please correct me if I'm mistaken.
Have a good one. (and I actually mean that)
p.s. sorry this is so OT, and Dronester, if you'd like to PM me instead of further derailing this thread, feel free to do so
Edited by Apothecus, : punctuation
Edited by Apothecus, : No reason given.

"My own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose. J.B.S Haldane 1892-1964

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by dronestar, posted 02-25-2010 4:04 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by dronestar, posted 02-26-2010 9:29 AM Apothecus has replied

Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


(1)
Message 66 of 124 (548734)
03-01-2010 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by dronestar
02-26-2010 9:29 AM


Re: Yeah, truly sad
Hey Dronester.
It seems you have adjusted your position regarding Bush Jr.
Not really, but thanks for putting words in my mouth.
What you did do was bring to the fore what I (like most people less angry than you) already know but prefer to move past. What good does it do?
And just so you know, this is simply a reply to your last post, and not an incitement for more argument. As far as I'm concerned, it's a moot point: we agree in this respect, if not with the same intensity. If you're incredulous that I don't share your incendiary zeal regarding these atrocities, then I'm afraid I've disappointed you. Oh well. You can't please everyone all the time.
Have a good one.

"My own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose. J.B.S Haldane 1892-1964

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by dronestar, posted 02-26-2010 9:29 AM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by dronestar, posted 03-01-2010 1:05 PM Apothecus has seen this message but not replied

Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


(1)
Message 74 of 124 (549188)
03-04-2010 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by dronestar
03-04-2010 4:27 PM


Re: Yeah, truly sad
Hey again dronester,
I thought this topic was dead so I sent you a PM replying to what was your last post before the most recent last post. Here it is, if you didn't realize it was there:
Hey dronester...
Sorry if I gave contradictory impressions... My final post was mostly a clarification of my (admittedly moderate) views. My first description of GW was perhaps too accepting on the surface, but one which probably serves to highlight the type of person I try to be: not especially inciting when it's not either necessary or asked-for. So instead of derailing the topic with what I actually think of GW's administration, actions, etc, my non-committal statement ended up being taken (by you) as something other than the light-hearted joking comment which it was intended to be.
Thus my reply about you not necessarily changing my mind. There wasn't much to change. Again, do I think these were terrible acts? Sure, but don't mistake my lack of singular intensity such as yours as my condoning those actions.
I realize the effects of the bullshit that GW pulled will last for many years. But did you miss my mea culpa in post #36? I as much as admitted that I should have taken a harder stance. Well, then (perhaps undeservedly) I took your reply to that post as douchbag-esque and ridiculous, etc, etc.... However, my point is that, as is my personal moderate MO, 9 times out of 10, I'll choose to take a less agressive standpoint over coming off as a vindictive, angry, albeit informed and educated, online poster.
No offense intended--I think we have more views in common than either of us realizes.
We all pick and fight our battles differently. If you'd like to label me as one of the "mindless middle", that's fine with me. This is just, after all, an anonymous online forum. But I'd still play it the same way.
Have a good one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by dronestar, posted 03-04-2010 4:27 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by dronestar, posted 03-05-2010 10:06 AM Apothecus has replied

Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


(1)
Message 84 of 124 (549268)
03-05-2010 12:47 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by dronestar
03-05-2010 10:06 AM


Re: Yeah, truly sad
Thanks for the reply, dronester.
I didn't realize you sent a PM. How do I receive those?
Top of the page, click on "Messaging". I've used it a couple of times and it's pretty slick. The problem is that, unless you always look at your email alerts (if you have that preference turned on), the only way you know if you have a PM is when a (#) appears to the right of "Messages". Kind of obscure, but I guess it is what it is...
"And I'll be honest: he [Adolph Hitler] wasn't that bad of a guy"
It's not a "middle of the road" expression, do you agree? Do you think some one might respond angrily? Might they even respond if it wasn't part of the OP's thread?
Well, of course that's not middle of the road, but then we're back to context, yes? I know you don't really equate W with Hitler, right? To most (notice I said most) folks, drawing this comparison would be a bit of a stretch - maybe not quite apples and oranges, but just about. Rest assured, though, your point was not lost on me. It's just that, in 2000, I didn't personally vote for Hitler.
I prefer not to come across as a 'judgemental arse', but if we want the world to be a better place, we all need to make a stand somewhere, sometime.
If nothing else, I gotta respect your passion in calling 'em as you see 'em. Keep it up, dude.

"My own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose. J.B.S Haldane 1892-1964

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by dronestar, posted 03-05-2010 10:06 AM dronestar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by onifre, posted 03-05-2010 1:19 PM Apothecus has replied

Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 88 of 124 (549276)
03-05-2010 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by onifre
03-05-2010 1:19 PM


Re: Yeah, truly sad
Absolutely not...Hitler gave great speeches.
From a purely entertainment standpoint though, they're pretty much on par with each other.
Abe: I guess the above could also be said if speaking from a purely horrification standpoint. Depends on one's perspective, no?
Edited by Apothecus, : abe

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by onifre, posted 03-05-2010 1:19 PM onifre has not replied

Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2440 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 117 of 124 (549657)
03-09-2010 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Apothecus
02-23-2010 10:10 PM


Clarification
Hey fellas.
Just thought, after 80+ posts following my "comment", that I'd attempt to cast some light on what I was getting at. I led in with this:
Did I hear of assassination threats to GW? Yes. Did I secretly wish they would come to fruition? Absolutely not. The threat of severe turmoil to national security, the economy, society and politics in general would be more than most reasonable people would prefer to experience.
The topic at that point was relating to religious whackos praying for Obama's death. Everyone remember that one? I was replying to a post by Hyro in which he asked Hooah if he'd have made such a fuss if it involved a president he didn't like. I then ended the paragraph with:
I'll be honest: he wasn't that bad of a guy; just sort of an idjit.
Apparently this remark (admittedly flippant) has caused a bit of a stir and has derailed this thread to the point of non-recognition. I'm surprised it's been allowed to go so long. But what I'd like to explain is that, when you take the above quotes as one statement, can you all at least try to accept that the reason for "not that bad of a guy" was mostly a function of that I didn't (and still don't) think he was the calibur of president who deserved to be assassinated?
See that?
Sorry. I should have been clearer than that. As I've stated before, it was meant lightheartedly, and some took it differently. But what I actually stated was very different from how some of you took it, and that, I feel was not my fault.
Again, sorry for this derailment, but hope everyone had a good time venting.
Edited by Apothecus, : syntax
Edited by Apothecus, : No reason given.

"My own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose. J.B.S Haldane 1892-1964

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Apothecus, posted 02-23-2010 10:10 PM Apothecus has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024