Evidence that the Great Unconformity did not Form Before the Strata above it

Jar, you complain all the time about my lack of evidence but I rarely see you producing any evidence for your outlandish claims. You make all kinds of assertions about evidence, rarely actually show any. There was no underwater basalt you say, well, there didn't necessarily have to be in my scenario either, if most of the eruptions occurred after the water had receded, but you don't give your evidence in any case, you just assert it.
ABE: Oh and those "severe die-offs." Typical OE joke. You see a paucity of life (an absence of fossils for some reason the theory tells you to expect) in some level of strata and call that a die-off and relate it to these events you also find dated in the strata. This is a ridiculous joke. The strata contain the fossil record of what was killed in the Flood.OE "evidence" is a pathetic joke, all made-up out of silly assumptions.

No millions of people to be killed in the century after the Flood, and there could have been weather patterns that protected the Middle East too, lots of rain perhaps, the development of the ice age in those northerly parts also exerting a damping influence on the volcanic effects.

Siberia is a long way away, and at the time India was probably en route via tectonic transport from the coast of Africa to its resting place in Asia some time later.

Yea, what are the blue stones?

Sad. Pathetic. You invent time periods for the strata and think you can tell by the dead things in them what lived during your imaginary time periods, but what the fossils REALLY should tell you is how amazingly diverse living things were before the Flood.

"Golly gee, ..."

All based on the bogus evidence of the false interpretation of the strata and their fossil contents. Of course those show worldwide effects, they represent what died in the worldwide Flood, not in the volcanism that came after the Flood, by which time all the strata were laid down and all the dead things in the fossil record thoroughly dead. Such a JOKE to peer into one of the strata and make claims about what supposedly happened during a mythical time period assigned to that block of rock. Like reading tea leaves.

"Every living thing od all flesh" is pretty clear.

Such evidence would be for instance the massive fossil cemetery of the Karoo.

You mean the fossils? But they ARE there in reality. It's what they represent that's in question. They all died in the Flood, all from Precambrian to Holocene, rather than in separate time periods over hundreds of millions of years.

I haven't spent a lot of time on the Karoo but have the impression there are no mammals represented there or some reptilian type mammals or something like that..

Perhaps what I just wrote in Message 700 about the general lack of mammals and humans in the fossil record also applies to the Karoo.

All I know is that the fossil record would put them at the very top where they had least chance of being fossilized.

I'm sure they didn't escape.

So, Faith, you don't have an idea what you're talking about, do you?

I didn't say their houses would be buried in the upper strata, just the people.

You have NOT proved the need for immense periods of time, ...

... you have artificially invented the idea. And the Flood took ONE YEAR with a few years of aftereffects, not 6000 years.

You WAY underestimate the destructive power of a worldwide Flood.

However, sometimes I think there may be artifacts from the pre-Flood world that are misinterpreted by Science as usual. Don't know, maybe all perished.

Of course your biased interpretation must be better than mine because it's yours, right?

edge, to me coprolites are always very interesting. Those guys just had a dump or two around their houses...