Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The TRVE history of the Flood...
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 482 of 1352 (806254)
04-24-2017 6:12 AM
Reply to: Message 479 by Faith
04-24-2017 5:54 AM


Re: A New Topic: The Cratonic Sequence
Faith writes:
But do you have a series of sea transgressions over the period of the Phanerozoic?
The Phaneorozoic is not a layer. And also not a period. Your question doesn't make any sense.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 479 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 5:54 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 483 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 6:18 AM Pressie has replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 484 of 1352 (806256)
04-24-2017 6:24 AM
Reply to: Message 483 by Faith
04-24-2017 6:18 AM


Re: A New Topic: The Cratonic Sequence
Faith writes:
I said over the PERIOD of the Phanerozoic, Pressie. During that TIME FRAME were there sea transgressions in South Africa or other parts of the world to match those in North America?
Again, Faith, your question doesn't make any sense. The Phanerozoic is not a period. And also not a layer.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 483 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 6:18 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 486 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 6:30 AM Pressie has replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 489 of 1352 (806261)
04-24-2017 6:46 AM
Reply to: Message 486 by Faith
04-24-2017 6:30 AM


Re: A New Topic: The Cratonic Sequences
Faith writes:
Sigh.
Try one more time:
DURING THE 542 million years that are said to span the Phanerozoic Era from the Cambrian to the Cenozoic, was there or was there not a series of sea transgressions over South Africa or any other continent?
I'll try one more time. The Phanerozoic is not a period and also not a layer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 486 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 6:30 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 515 by Adminnemooseus, posted 04-24-2017 8:19 PM Pressie has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(1)
Message 492 of 1352 (806264)
04-24-2017 7:00 AM
Reply to: Message 490 by Faith
04-24-2017 6:49 AM


Re: mountain formation
Faith writes:
CRR didn't say anything to deserve that, Pressie. YOU should learn some manners.
I disagree. CRR accused hundreds of thousands of scientists from all over the world of telling untruths. CRR should be ashamed. You should be ashamed for defending those obvious untruths.
I think that it represents good manners pointing out untruths.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 490 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 6:49 AM Faith has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 496 of 1352 (806268)
04-24-2017 7:18 AM
Reply to: Message 494 by Faith
04-24-2017 7:07 AM


Re: A New Topic: The Cratonic Sequences
Faith writes:
The other continents had to be affected, Paul.
Nope. They weren't. Not by any simultaneous 'global flood', anyway. Nor by any other big flood.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 494 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 7:07 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 497 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 7:42 AM Pressie has replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 498 of 1352 (806270)
04-24-2017 7:50 AM
Reply to: Message 497 by Faith
04-24-2017 7:42 AM


m not too sure what you're writing here. My qRe: A New Topic: The Cratonic Sequences
I'm not too sure what you're writing here. Something that happened in North America is not evidence for what happened in South Africa at the same time. We certainly don't have any evidence for the same transgressions happening here. Maybe because what is the Karoo was an inland lake while that happend in North America? No evidence for a global flood.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 497 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 7:42 AM Faith has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 501 of 1352 (806274)
04-24-2017 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 497 by Faith
04-24-2017 7:42 AM


Re: A New Topic: The Cratonic Sequences
Faith writes:
It is a conclusion from the evidence given in Message 477 and discussed later. You do believe in evidence don't you?
Sure. No exploration or mining companies in the world use some great flood for their exploration or mining. They spend billions.
Old earth methods work. Floodists are to scared to test their models. They are to scared to spend a cent on reality.
That's evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 497 by Faith, posted 04-24-2017 7:42 AM Faith has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(1)
Message 521 of 1352 (806363)
04-25-2017 4:43 AM
Reply to: Message 520 by Faith
04-25-2017 4:14 AM


Re: Tectonic violence etc
This one is funny.
Faith writes:
...So I've calculated how fast the Americas split from Europe/Africa for instance,....
No need to calculate, we measure the age of the sea floor between the Americas and Europe/Africa directly. The info is easy to get.
It's quite easy. One of the methods involves the changing magnetic field on the planet found in the rocks between the Americas and Africa/Europe and another one involves radiometric dating techniques of those same rocks. No need for relatively uneducated people like you to try and do complex maths!
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 520 by Faith, posted 04-25-2017 4:14 AM Faith has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(1)
Message 524 of 1352 (806368)
04-25-2017 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 523 by vimesey
04-25-2017 5:23 AM


Re: Quick formula
Yes, the energy released in that scenario is enough to vaporise the whole earth a few thousand times over. Every minute.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 523 by vimesey, posted 04-25-2017 5:23 AM vimesey has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 525 of 1352 (806371)
04-25-2017 6:24 AM
Reply to: Message 519 by Faith
04-25-2017 3:55 AM


Re: Cratonic Sequences Timing Complications/Implications: Rodinia, Pangaea
This one is funny:
Faith writes:
Observation: ...
Nope. You didn't directly see it happening.
Are you deliberately trying to conflate the standard creationist "Observational" and "Historical" sciences? You must be a compromiser.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 519 by Faith, posted 04-25-2017 3:55 AM Faith has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 552 of 1352 (806512)
04-26-2017 6:12 AM
Reply to: Message 551 by Faith
04-26-2017 5:03 AM


Re: Erosion and unconformities in Cratonic Sequences
I'm trying to figure out what you're saying, Faith.
For example:
Faith writes:
Perhaps you could offer some specific evidence for these? Where for instance have these unconformities been identified? Unlikely they all exist in any one geo column, right?
What the heck is 'any one geo column'? The core from a borehole?
You really don't make any sense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 551 by Faith, posted 04-26-2017 5:03 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 553 by Faith, posted 04-26-2017 6:14 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 554 of 1352 (806514)
04-26-2017 6:22 AM
Reply to: Message 551 by Faith
04-26-2017 5:03 AM


Re: Erosion and unconformities in Cratonic Sequences
I'm trying to figure out what you're saying, Faith.
For example:
Faith writes:
Perhaps you could offer some specific evidence for these? Where for instance have these unconformities been identified? Unlikely they all exist in any one geo column, right?
What the heck is 'any one geo column'? That doesn't make any sense.
The core from a borehole? I, personally have logged a lot of boreholes. I' ve seen a lot of unconformities just by logging boreholes. Unconformities are easily identified.
Have you?
You really don't make any sense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 551 by Faith, posted 04-26-2017 5:03 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 555 by Faith, posted 04-26-2017 6:26 AM Pressie has replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 556 of 1352 (806517)
04-26-2017 6:30 AM
Reply to: Message 528 by Coyote
04-25-2017 11:11 AM


Re: More nonsense
Coyote, they will never discuss your research, because they can't find anything about it on some creationist website. The so-called "scientific" creationists deliberately ignore you while their sheep don't want to know anything about you or your reseach.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 528 by Coyote, posted 04-25-2017 11:11 AM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 572 by CRR, posted 04-27-2017 7:59 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 557 of 1352 (806519)
04-26-2017 6:44 AM
Reply to: Message 555 by Faith
04-26-2017 6:26 AM


Re: Erosion and unconformities in Cratonic Sequences
Faith writes:
Since you recognize these imaginary unconformities so easily,..
Unconformities are really easy to identify in all those rocks I've studied.
Faith writes:
... please identify the six that are supposedly represented on the chart of the Cratonic Sequences...
I'm not too sure why you think there's only six unconformities in the rocks I've studied deposited on the Kaapvaal Craton. I found many, many more.
Faith writes:
... and give their geographic location. Thank you.
Sure. It involves the Barberton, Wits, Transvaal, Gravelotte, Dwyka, Witteberg, Vryheid, Bokkeveld, Table Mountain, Vanrhynsdorp, Malmesbury, Vaalkoppies, etc. etc. All in South Africa.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 555 by Faith, posted 04-26-2017 6:26 AM Faith has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(1)
Message 558 of 1352 (806520)
04-26-2017 6:55 AM
Reply to: Message 550 by CRR
04-26-2017 4:29 AM


Re: Six "Flood" Arguments Creationists Can't Answer
This would be very interesting.
CRR writes:
OK, 5. Fossil Sequence. I'll do some research and get back to you.
I take it that CRR is going to unearth a fossil.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 550 by CRR, posted 04-26-2017 4:29 AM CRR has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024