I'm still more interested in the educational background of the creationists here. Is it only an accident that most of them have precious little real experience learning about biology? Most of the evolutionists either work in the field or have studied extensively, and we are also familiar with creationist writers and their work. The creationists learn everything second hand and in a scattershot fashion.
Some of the more educated posters from the creationist camp display a troubling messiah complex for their new favorite writer. It could be they just discovered Michael Behe, Phillip Johnson, Richard Milton, or some other scribe who's fired their imagination with an anti-Darwinian manifesto. The allegations made are assumed to be true, and any attempt to refute the argument is dismissed as ' desperate defense of an outmoded paradigm' or what have you.
I agree people should think for themselves, and examine all the evidence available. But think, for crying out loud!
The dark nursery of evolution is very dark indeed.
Brad McFall