Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   AntiGod education should not be compulsary (even for non wealthy)
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 106 of 281 (84251)
02-07-2004 1:18 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by hitchy
02-06-2004 2:46 AM


Re: theories and convincing
a scientific theory is an explanation of several related natural phenomena
(facts/empirical observations)
nevertheless it is a set of ideas that ammount to in many peoples opinion, also backed by science, a godless religion which is not to be forced.
they do study those things in public school
Study free will all you want, don't try to force feed your one sided self declared wonderments on kids when it ammounts to an assault on faith.
and many people believe that earth is flat
Why, would some want to force that on us too?
what i do care about are young minds that will some day find
a cure for cancer, cure aids, go to the moon, make a funny superbowl ad, run for
president, etc...my students acheiving their dreams is my goal. for that, they need a
well-rounded education
So we should prohibit prayer, and the bible, and teaching our kids according to Godly science. I can see why you'd be uptight here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by hitchy, posted 02-06-2004 2:46 AM hitchy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by crashfrog, posted 02-07-2004 1:27 PM simple has replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 107 of 281 (84253)
02-07-2004 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Rand Al'Thor
02-06-2004 2:31 AM


Re: plenty
Do you think forcing people to bow down and worship a rock would be harmful? Or having to deny their faith at the door of the school? It wouldn't kill them, but, like godless science, and education that is godless, it's not something a parent of a christian child would desire to be forced to do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 02-06-2004 2:31 AM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 108 of 281 (84254)
02-07-2004 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by hitchy
02-06-2004 2:53 AM


Re: one more thing...
why do you believe it is harmful and wrong
see last post

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by hitchy, posted 02-06-2004 2:53 AM hitchy has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 109 of 281 (84255)
02-07-2004 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by simple
02-07-2004 1:18 PM


nevertheless it is a set of ideas that ammount to in many peoples opinion, also backed by science, a godless religion which is not to be forced.
Science is not a religion.
Religion is revelatory. Knowledge in religion stems from God through chosen prophets. Prophets don't choose themselves - there's no training or schooling in the world that can make God dictate the next book of the Bible to you.
Science is participatory. Anybody can do it. All it takes is some study in order to catch up to everybody else, and you're on your way. If you don't like the conclusions of scientists it's entirely possible to analyze the data and come up with your own.
If I don't agree with the statements of a prophet, what recourse do I have? And how do I tell the difference between a "prophet" and a "liar"? These are not problems science has.
What rituals are performed in science? What observances are held? What churches exist for Science? These are common - many would say required - features of religion. Science has none of these.
You can say that science is a religion all you like, but saying it doesn't make it true. Science is religion-neutral.
So we should prohibit prayer, and the bible, and teaching our kids according to Godly science.
There's no such thing. That is, if by "Godly science" you mean "rejecting any and all data that conflicts with the accounts in the Bible." That would not be science. That would be self-deception.
And why should we teach only Godly science? What about Muslim science? Or Vedic science? Or Buddist science? Why are you so Christian-centric? America is a society of religious plurality. Your push to have God - and only God - in the classroom is simply un-American.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:18 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 2:39 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 123 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 2:56 PM crashfrog has replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 110 of 281 (84256)
02-07-2004 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Andya Primanda
02-06-2004 4:17 AM


Re: plenty
What kind of religion you have! You talk so much of love yet this is the future for us
non-Christians? Trampled by Jesus' army bent on conquiring the world by violence?
I don't think He'd dream of trampling anyone who didn't activly try to fight Him. For the kids, and Christians it's the Calvary coming to save us. At least He's not just going to bomb a village, or town, or restarant, and not care who's in there!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Andya Primanda, posted 02-06-2004 4:17 AM Andya Primanda has not replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 111 of 281 (84259)
02-07-2004 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by nator
02-06-2004 9:06 AM


Gee, my Buddhist friends might have a problem with you indoctrinating their children in a religion
that they do not follow.
I'd vote to let'm learn what they like, but if you can't respect the majority as being Christian, then just don't make it mandatory!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by nator, posted 02-06-2004 9:06 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by nator, posted 02-07-2004 4:55 PM simple has not replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 112 of 281 (84261)
02-07-2004 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by nator
02-06-2004 9:20 AM


No, the "fact" doesn't stand that they were all Christians, as you have claimed
I didn't say "all".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by nator, posted 02-06-2004 9:20 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by nator, posted 02-07-2004 4:57 PM simple has replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 113 of 281 (84262)
02-07-2004 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by nator
02-06-2004 9:39 AM


Re: plenty
I don't normally pick on spelling and grammar errors because we all make them from time to time,
but I just couldn't resist pointing out the numerous examples you made in the light of your blanket
criticisms of science
fair enough. granted I am guilty. So do I have to see kids shot up with ritilin, so they can be numbed into listening to that godless education now as a result of spelling errors?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by nator, posted 02-06-2004 9:39 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by nator, posted 02-07-2004 4:58 PM simple has replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 114 of 281 (84265)
02-07-2004 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by Taqless
02-06-2004 6:47 PM


Re: change
Show that ToE is AntiGod
show me in Darwinism where God is? Can you point out how evolution embraces God in some way, and His written account of Orgins? Perhaps I never looked into it close enough.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Taqless, posted 02-06-2004 6:47 PM Taqless has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by crashfrog, posted 02-07-2004 1:56 PM simple has replied
 Message 117 by NosyNed, posted 02-07-2004 2:00 PM simple has not replied
 Message 146 by Taqless, posted 02-09-2004 3:45 PM simple has replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 115 of 281 (84267)
02-07-2004 1:53 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by hitchy
02-06-2004 11:10 PM


gipper comes
i thought of an analogy for this whole thread
Thanks for the story. Any point you'd like a comment on?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by hitchy, posted 02-06-2004 11:10 PM hitchy has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 116 of 281 (84268)
02-07-2004 1:56 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by simple
02-07-2004 1:48 PM


show me in Darwinism where God is? Can you point out how evolution embraces God in some way, and His written account of Orgins?
Well hell, I don't think Huckleberry Finn "embraces" the Genesis account, except as a metaphor or myth at some point, but I don't think that makes it "anti-God", do you?
Isn't it possible to be religion-neutral to you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:48 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 2:17 PM crashfrog has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 117 of 281 (84269)
02-07-2004 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by simple
02-07-2004 1:48 PM


Re: change
show me in Darwinism where God is?
Show me where in my TV remote instruction manual God is. Is it anti God?
Darwin, in fact, in "The Origin of Species"
quote:
He who believes that each equine species was independently created, will, I presume, assert that each species has been created with a tendency to vary, both under nature and under domestication, in this particular manner, so as often to become striped like the other species of the genus; and that each has been created with a strong tendency, when crossed with species inhabiting distant quarters of the world, to produce hybrids resembling in their stripes, not their own parents, but other species of the genus. To admit this view is, as it seems to me, to reject a real for an unreal, or at least for an unknown cause. It makes the works of God a mere mockery and deception; I would almost as soon believe with the old and ignorant cosmogonists, that fossil shells had never lived, but had been created in stone so as to mock the shells now living on the sea-shore.
Which is both your mention of God and is explicit in saying that the living things are works of God and warns about the kind of thing you are doing to Christianity.
It is after all a scientific work. You would not find such references today. This is not because they are anti God (remember that about 40% of scientists are believers) but because like my TV remote manual it is not relevant.
I am very sure you never looked at it close enough. It is a surprisingly good read. It is however more than a century out of date now and there are much better explanations of current theory.
[This message has been edited by NosyNed, 02-07-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 1:48 PM simple has not replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 118 of 281 (84271)
02-07-2004 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by Taqless
02-06-2004 6:47 PM


warming up here
I wanted evidence for your claim that the bible was "the oldest book".
why do you think Adam had some reading lined up, when he was done meeting Eve? If you know of a more ancient writing go ahead, share it.
The problem is belief, but not in God, in the Bible
At least you come out and have a clear position.
No, it is the afterlife that I don't think much of
If I was raised in a public school, I would probably share your view.
Like I asked, provide the "results" (you know numbers, statistics, etc), or at least a
line of reasoning for this claim.
(Regarding drugs, etc,) Things are in a state of decay that is I think a result of having no God in education. In History, in biology, in science, in everything, not to mention music! When you toss out God, and truth, and beauty, and prayer, you destroy the foundation. If there is no God, no right or wrong, why not bring a gun to school? Who is to say it is wrong? Why not take drugs (in addition to the ones the make you take)? Why not marry a monkey? Or why not be a cannibal? ( Or act like Sodom & Gommorah?) Unless you have a God, who is to say you are more right than I? Or your idea is true? Everything is equal, all lifestyles, murdering young unborn children, or anything. It's the survival of the fittest! May the best man win! see what I'm getting at? Throw out the rule giver, and there goes the rules.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Taqless, posted 02-06-2004 6:47 PM Taqless has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by crashfrog, posted 02-07-2004 2:14 PM simple has replied
 Message 149 by Taqless, posted 02-09-2004 4:36 PM simple has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 119 of 281 (84272)
02-07-2004 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by simple
02-07-2004 2:09 PM


Throw out the rule giver, and there goes the rules.
Funny, then, that atheists (while accounting for about 5-10% of Americans) constitute less than 1% of the prison population, and that it's Christians who lead the country in getting divorces...
We're getting off-topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 2:09 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by simple, posted 02-07-2004 2:30 PM crashfrog has not replied

simple 
Inactive Member


Message 120 of 281 (84273)
02-07-2004 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by crashfrog
02-07-2004 1:56 PM


religion neutral or neutered?
Well hell, I don't think Huckleberry Finn "embraces" the Genesis account, except as a metaphor
or myth at some point, but I don't think that makes it "anti-God", do you?
I don't have to pay taxes to Mark Twain. And a good novel is a little different than a forced labotomy. Or a forced education neutered of the Savior.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by crashfrog, posted 02-07-2004 1:56 PM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024