Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   abstinece-only sex education
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 248 of 306 (314101)
05-21-2006 8:23 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by Faith
05-21-2006 2:32 AM


Re: tracking the cause-effect is no sure thing
And you know, if you don't want me to bite, as you put it, you might practice some restraint in your bratty rudeness.
it is not bratty to call you on being wrong just because you're older than me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by Faith, posted 05-21-2006 2:32 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by Faith, posted 05-21-2006 1:59 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 249 of 306 (314103)
05-21-2006 8:32 AM
Reply to: Message 246 by riVeRraT
05-21-2006 7:44 AM


Re: Who's in Charge?
abstinence only education includes misinformation created by certain organizations in order to teach kids that the only way is to not have sex until marriage. this misinformation includes such as 'condoms can't protect you from aids or even pregnancy because the pores are too big'. this is scientifically false. completely. but i learned it in my sex-ed class. this kind of information leads to a slight delay in sexual activity followed by sex without precautions and often oral or anal sex because "it isn't really sex". anal sex is more prone to transmission because of the lack of natural lubrication and much less sturdy tissue.
thus, we see more disease and more pregnancy.
i'm all about abstinence. i don't think there's anything wrong with sex at any time or for any reason, but waiting sure can't hurt you if you approach it responsibly and don't repress things. self-love is always better than spreading it around. however, it's not something we should be teaching using false information.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by riVeRraT, posted 05-21-2006 7:44 AM riVeRraT has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 253 of 306 (314134)
05-21-2006 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 252 by Jazzns
05-21-2006 11:25 AM


Re: misunderstanding
This in fact should be done from elementary school on up because sexual exploitation does not just affect those who have gone or are going through puberty.
very good point.
Where has the legal precedent defined the "if you love me" as coercion in a rape case? I am not saying it hasn't. I would just like to see some backup for it.
If it has though, then I that is really crap. While the area between psychological coercion and peer pressure is pretty gray, we shouldn't be assigning victim status that coincides with gullability.
actually. i haven't got any case law. i should look into it (lazy). but it is also legally rape if you change your mind during sex and don't tell your partner. i don't necessarily agree with that, but i do know that there may be times when you change your mind and don't feel safe stating such. psychological coercion (including peer pressure) is wrong in any case. people must be free to make up their own minds. and just because someone falls for a line doesn't make them gullible or mean that they have a victim complex. if someone is taken advantage of, they deserve recourse. just because our current society is full of fakers who have created a judicial mess of coffee spills doesn't change the reality of sexual violation. if a child is told by a molestor that if he says anything to anyone about the violation that they'll just punish the child does the fact that he's a child or that he was scared enoug to believe it change that it is coercion and wrong? child or adult, people can be prey to the strangest things. this doesn't mean that they don't deserve to be protected.
I say this of course with deepest regards for whatever trauma you may have undergone in your life. Every circumstance is going to be different of course. I hope I don't offend you.
that's all i'm saying. every circumstance is different. but we can prepare for such things and educate our children on how to defend themselves.
i completely agree that such defensive education should be done early. but then i think that sex-ed should be taught early and gradually. do you teach a 5 year old how to put on a condom? no. but you do teach a five year old that babies come from mommies and daddies. and that sometimes people will try to do things they shouldn't to you and no one will be mad at you if you report it. do you teach a ten year old how to put on a condom? maybe we should. have you seen the movie kids?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by Jazzns, posted 05-21-2006 11:25 AM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by Jazzns, posted 05-22-2006 1:03 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 256 of 306 (314167)
05-21-2006 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 254 by Faith
05-21-2006 1:59 PM


Re: tracking the cause-effect is no sure thing
and yet clearly it doesn't work the way you say it does. but whatever. you're right. cause the bible tells you so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 254 by Faith, posted 05-21-2006 1:59 PM Faith has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 263 of 306 (314274)
05-22-2006 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 261 by Silent H
05-22-2006 4:55 AM


Re: misunderstanding
That does not challenge what I said at all. I mean so you are in support of school boards teaching that pressures (internal or external) to engage in homosexual or mixed race relations is wrong and unhealthy if that is what the majority feels?
i already told you. discuss something as illegal. do not discuss wrong.
That simple statement is surely an emotional appeal and may be manipulative and selfish, but is not under all conditions malevolent. Unlike RAPE the person really does have a choice, and both parties might not look at it as anything negative later.
Can you see that your black/white vision on this is not necessarily universal?
it's not my vision. it's the law. i told you i didn't necessarily agree with it. but manipulation is wrong and the point it to prepare children to resist manipulation should they choose that they are not ready.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by Silent H, posted 05-22-2006 4:55 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 269 by Silent H, posted 05-23-2006 6:22 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 264 of 306 (314277)
05-22-2006 8:43 AM
Reply to: Message 258 by Jazzns
05-22-2006 1:03 AM


Re: misunderstanding
There has got to be some kind of social contract that is signed once you say, "take me baby!" At that point the onus would be on the "victim" to say stop or else it is not rape.
i think it's more that in a proper situation you are aware of your partner's needs and desires and it's generally VERY obvious when someone changes his mind. a girl will often dry up and a guy well.. guys are funny. they'll start looking away or something. the point is that if you're interested in what the other person is thinking, you'll know they want to stop.
but yes it is difficult and ridiculous. but then a lot of people seem to have trouble figuring out if people want it in the first place, like basketball players and government officials in south africa.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by Jazzns, posted 05-22-2006 1:03 AM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 265 by Jazzns, posted 05-22-2006 9:51 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 267 of 306 (314404)
05-22-2006 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 265 by Jazzns
05-22-2006 9:51 AM


indeed. i'll look into it. i did some informal google searches and came up with nothing but statistics. these are kinda things i've heard in rape presentations though.
but the kind of education program i'm suggesting is merely the kind that we get in college from the wellness people. i see no reason why it can't be done in middle or high school. learning to set and keep boundaries is a part of a healthy sexual process.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 265 by Jazzns, posted 05-22-2006 9:51 AM Jazzns has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 271 of 306 (314548)
05-23-2006 8:39 AM
Reply to: Message 269 by Silent H
05-23-2006 6:22 AM


Re: misunderstanding
Hey, I just got done saying that what you described is not always if ever considered illegal. And I also brought up many things you might consider fine are illegal in some places, and where not illegal now, were illegal just a few years back and can be again.
If homosexual marriage is made illegal and indeed unconstitutional, my guess is you would not favor teachers telling your kids they should view that as proper. Heck, would you be for them telling your kids porn is illegal?
And again I might point out that your suggestuon is 100% a recipe for indoctrination. Teach the law as if it is fact, and it is as if it is fact, rather than merely current legislation which may be errant.
you ask me what i would want the program to do regarding something that is illegal. i replied appropriately and now you're telling me 'but it's not always illegal. well la de freakin da. if it's not illegal then there's no issue. i think a lot of things are proper that are illegal, namely armed revolt. homosexual sex is not something i'm worried about. and porn is not illegal. at least not in most places.
the law is never fact in a democratic state. it merely reflects the opinion of the supported majority party. the only fact is that you will be charged if you break it. but civil disobedience is a beautiful thing. we should have gay love-ins on courthouse steps if they ever outlaw it.
What you are discussing is regret and realization that they were manipulated. I find it is not as important to teach a "resist or die" approach, but rather good logic skills in general and coping skills for when logic and will have failed.
who said resist or die? you're crazy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by Silent H, posted 05-23-2006 6:22 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 273 by Silent H, posted 05-24-2006 5:08 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 275 of 306 (314827)
05-24-2006 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 273 by Silent H
05-24-2006 5:08 AM


Re: misunderstanding
According to your own words failure to resist is equal to being raped and/or getting aids. It was clear hyperbole, which was inaccurate, unhealthy, and unuseful.
it is not the failure to resist that is damaging, but the manipulation.
i'm tired of the foreskin adhesions anyways.
just another meaningless argument in which you have failed to understand what i'm talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 273 by Silent H, posted 05-24-2006 5:08 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 277 by Silent H, posted 05-25-2006 3:12 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 280 of 306 (315099)
05-25-2006 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 277 by Silent H
05-25-2006 3:12 AM


Re: misunderstanding
no. you're being argumentative and refusing to pay attention to very simple ideas. you have no interest in being explained to, but rather jumping on my terminology and my personal opinions that i use to describe my position. you have not discussed the actual position except in the first response in which you flat out denied the possibility of it being a reasonable idea. since then you have muddled around with sideline crap. excuse me if i don't have any interest in discussing anything with you since this is your general tendency. not to mention that you probably should know better than to discuss what-ifs of inhibitions of civil rights. you simply won't get a positive response from trying to goad me into suggesting that people be encouraged to follow unjust laws. it's just not friendly.
in college, we have organizations that provide sex-ed sort of stuff. it's not generally in a formal class, though it easily could be formatted that way. they tend to be in residence hall lectures during orientation week or special event lectures and that sort of thing. these lectures talk about the particulars of diseases and protection. they also talk about how to say no if you choose, and how to discuss sex if you choose. they discuss how to avoid date rape and how to respond if it happens. they discuss boundaries and emotions and impact. all i'm suggesting is that we format this to a more formal class setting and add in the medical discussion of how organs work and where hormones come from and then install it at the middle or high school level.
in fact, there was a little booklet involving what i'm describing in the student clinic the last time i went. ashamed to say it was produced by mtv, but it was a very useful little booklet. this website has an e-copy of it. it's really not difficult to discuss how to be emotionally and sexually responsible without discussing right or wrong or law or anything.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by Silent H, posted 05-25-2006 3:12 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 281 by nator, posted 05-25-2006 8:55 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied
 Message 286 by Silent H, posted 05-28-2006 9:47 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024