Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why only one Grand Canyon
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 54 of 85 (161184)
11-18-2004 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Spicket
11-18-2004 3:32 PM


W e l c o m e !
Hello, Spicket, welcome to EvC.
You seem to be starting off on the right foot. Asking questions is always a good idea.
Your question about the nature of the canyon isn't by itself a bad one.
However, there is a very important point to make with all the many, many different issues that come up in these kind of discussions:
You can never (or rarely) take one piece of information and fly with that. Any speculation you might have over what happened or didn't happen has to deal with all the information available.
There is a great deal of information about the nature of the geology of the grand canyon that has to be dealt with to construct an even vaguely reasonable suggestion about it's formation. Some of the suggestions may be shown to be untenable when just a few bits of that information is considered.
You might want to do a bit of research to find out what some of those other facts are. If you continue with the right tone here you'll find that many here will be glad to point those out to you too. (Some pretty frequent posters are actual geologists).
Just remember the basic point. It does no good to deal with any one fact. They all have to fit into the picture you are painting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Spicket, posted 11-18-2004 3:32 PM Spicket has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 61 of 85 (162187)
11-22-2004 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by tsig
11-21-2004 11:58 PM


Re: One Grand Canyon
Many Grand Canyons?
I think you'd have to spell that out. I did a little look and found something about the Blyde River canyon in South Africa. It is, apparently the third largest in the world.
Sound pretty impressive, 600 to 800 m down and the park it is in covers over 22,000 hectares( 4.5 acres each). So pretty grand.
However the grand canyon is about 2,000 m deep at it's deepest and the complex covers over 1.2 million hectares. I don't know what number two is. But compared to the Grand Canyon the Blyde canyon is pretty "ungrand".
There are, of course, a lot of canyons all over the world. Almost everywhere a river runs there is something that one could call a canyon. But the conditions that allow for the formation of really big canyons are not so common it appears.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by tsig, posted 11-21-2004 11:58 PM tsig has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by roxrkool, posted 11-22-2004 11:12 AM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 64 by tsig, posted 11-22-2004 2:34 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 77 of 85 (163481)
11-27-2004 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by tsig
11-27-2004 11:21 AM


d yankee bluffing?
It appears that, in spite of his claims of expertise, d yankee isn't going to be quick to answer questions.
It might be early to call a "hit and run" but it looks like it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by tsig, posted 11-27-2004 11:21 AM tsig has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024