Hello, Spicket, welcome to EvC.
You seem to be starting off on the right foot. Asking questions is always a good idea.
Your question about the nature of the canyon isn't by itself a bad one.
However, there is a very important point to make with all the many, many different issues that come up in these kind of discussions:
You can never (or rarely) take one piece of information and fly with that. Any speculation you might have over what happened or didn't happen has to deal with
all the information available.
There is a great deal of information about the nature of the geology of the grand canyon that has to be dealt with to construct an even vaguely reasonable suggestion about it's formation. Some of the suggestions may be shown to be untenable when just a few bits of that information is considered.
You might want to do a bit of research to find out what some of those other facts are. If you continue with the right tone here you'll find that many here will be glad to point those out to you too. (Some pretty frequent posters are actual geologists).
Just remember the basic point. It does no good to deal with any one fact. They all have to fit into the picture you are painting.