Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How the geo strata are identified as time periods
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


(1)
Message 12 of 101 (344427)
08-28-2006 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Faith
08-28-2006 3:45 PM


As Per Request
What I'd really like to see on this thread is discussion of some very specific locations and formations and how they were assigned to particular time periods, actually rather than hypothetically. The question I had was really about how you determine at a given location whether and how the various layers represent the established time periods of the Geologic Time Table.
I hope I am not being too pushy by providing you one example out of thousands for purposes of potential further discussion.
In the paper Geology and Coal Resources of the Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico and Colorado by James E. Fassett, several methods are used to date a sequence of formations immediately near and including the Fruitland Formation in Northwest New Mexico. These methods include: correlation to type fossils, particularly ammonites; radiometric dating on included ash beds using the 40Ar/39Ar method; magnetic polarity reversal data, and rates of sediment accumulation/subsidence (although in this last case, not as a precise determinant of age but rather as examined rates that make sense under the model presented). Please pay particular attention to the section on "Summary of Chronostratigraphy."
Sorry if the paper is technical in nature but geology is after all, a physical science that takes years to completely absorb (I somewhat know). Perhaps if you look at the paper, it may lead to questions that myself or others here may help answering.
I hope that in answering this request, I am not attempting to move the thread too quickly.
PS-There are more ways to date geologic formations than have been mentioned up to this point, but the above may be information overload enough for now as per admin. suggestion.
Link to paper cited added by AdminJar
Edited by AdminJar, : add link to cite

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 08-28-2006 3:45 PM Faith has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 20 of 101 (344591)
08-29-2006 1:24 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by robinrohan
08-29-2006 12:44 AM


RobinRohan and the Concept of Infinite Ego
His condescending attitude annoys me.
I'm sorry, I didn't know this thread was about your feelings. Please consider proposing a new topic about yourself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by robinrohan, posted 08-29-2006 12:44 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by robinrohan, posted 08-29-2006 10:41 AM anglagard has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 22 of 101 (344593)
08-29-2006 1:41 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Faith
08-28-2006 11:09 PM


Just Trying to Help
OK, guys, I can see you want me to work hard for this information; might as well go get me a degree in geology. I could look up all the articles about geology on the internet myself, you know, and struggle through them all to see if they discuss how strata were named at particular locations, which would take years. I've actually spent a fair amount of time in that sort of pursuit in my sojourn at EvC. So. Well. I don't know. I guess we can let this thread take it's good ol' time and I'll answer when I get around to studying the stuff. Or not.
You asked about wanting to see something about a geologic formation that was dated by multiple methods, if I understood correctly. I sought to show you an example of a geologic formation that was dated by multiple methods.
I simply tried to answer your question because, as a librarian, it is my nature and my job to answer questions I feel I may be able to answer. I only asked that you try to read that one part of the paper which showed how a formation was dated by multiple means, not that you undertake a degree program, although you may want to have a dictionary of geologic terms handy in order to fully comprehend that one part of that one article.
Although I do have a BS in geological engineering, I am no expert as I do not work in that field. Unfortunately, despiite the fact that it was 26 years ago, I may be still be too close to such esoteric knowledge to fully appreciate the difficulty a novice may have.
For that reason, I will not contribute further to this thread unless requested.
Edited by anglagard, : speling

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Faith, posted 08-28-2006 11:09 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024