OK, guys, I can see you want me to work hard for this information; might as well go get me a degree in geology. I could look up all the articles about geology on the internet myself, you know, and struggle through them all to see if they discuss how strata were named at particular locations, which would take years. I've actually spent a fair amount of time in that sort of pursuit in my sojourn at EvC. So. Well. I don't know. I guess we can let this thread take it's good ol' time and I'll answer when I get around to studying the stuff. Or not.
You asked about wanting to see something about a geologic formation that was dated by multiple methods, if I understood correctly. I sought to show you an example of a geologic formation that was dated by multiple methods.
I simply tried to answer your question because, as a librarian, it is my nature and my job to answer questions I feel I may be able to answer. I only asked that you try to read that one part of the paper which showed how a formation was dated by multiple means, not that you undertake a degree program, although you may want to have a dictionary of geologic terms handy in order to fully comprehend that one part of that one article.
Although I do have a BS in geological engineering, I am no expert as I do not work in that field. Unfortunately, despiite the fact that it was 26 years ago, I may be still be too close to such esoteric knowledge to fully appreciate the difficulty a novice may have.
For that reason, I will not contribute further to this thread unless requested.
Edited by anglagard, : speling