Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How the geo strata are identified as time periods
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 24 of 101 (344633)
08-29-2006 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Faith
08-29-2006 1:10 AM


Re: Slow down Jazzns
To stick my foot in once more: William Smith and several other Englishmen did and wrote about what you're wanting about 190 years ago, Faith. Mr Smith, in particular, built canals for a living. He kept track of the rocks he found while doing this - a particular white-to-yellow limestone might show up at two spots, one 50 miles northeast of the other, and both times with, say, a grey sandstone above it and a black shale below. And the particular set of seashells found in each were very similar - but different from the set in a yellowish limestone that he'd dug through 50 miles to the southeast.
Then Smith would go dig a canal elsewhere along the line of the first two above, and predict where he'd hit that same lime with the same seashell assemblage! And he'd never find that assemblage away from that particular line there in southern England, though Frenchmen might find the same set in a similar limestone in the Alps.
I'll find the book tonight and get a detail or two.....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Faith, posted 08-29-2006 1:10 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Faith, posted 08-29-2006 8:56 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 34 of 101 (344693)
08-29-2006 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Percy
08-29-2006 10:36 AM


Re: order of sedimentation
Ah, I see you've chosen Coragyps or Jazzns. Good. Let's see if they accept.
I'd be happy to, but it'll be somewhat slow. This $70 oil keeps us hoppin'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Percy, posted 08-29-2006 10:36 AM Percy has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 49 of 101 (344785)
08-29-2006 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Jazzns
08-29-2006 4:07 PM


Re: Igneous ROcks
I am not sure how this really relates to the discussion though because how things "settle" does not really play too much into what age it is given AFAIK.
But it can have a great deal to do with determining how quickly the rock formed, and under what conditions. A shale with individual grains all under a micron in size won't be able to form at all in significant turbulence: the particles will never settle. Diatomaceous earth or a limestone made entirely of coccolithophorids is much the same, and also have to wait on the critters they're made from to live, die, and settle to bottom.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Jazzns, posted 08-29-2006 4:07 PM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Jazzns, posted 08-29-2006 4:23 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 95 of 101 (348887)
09-13-2006 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by pesto
09-13-2006 5:17 PM


Re: Basalt not a radiometricly datable volcanic
Typically you don't need to know the initial ratios: methods like isochrons and concordia diagrams remove that number from the list of variables. Another instance where it doesn't much matter is in dating single zircons. When a crystal of zirconium silicate forms from molten rock, its crystal lattice will exclude any lead very efficiently, but will let some uranium in in the place of zirconium. If you find lead in a well-formed zircon, then, you can bet that it's there as a decay product of uranium, not as an original part of the grain.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by pesto, posted 09-13-2006 5:17 PM pesto has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by AdminNosy, posted 09-13-2006 5:46 PM Coragyps has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 97 of 101 (348894)
09-13-2006 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by AdminNosy
09-13-2006 5:46 PM


Re: Getting grouchy.
Yessir. No more derail.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by AdminNosy, posted 09-13-2006 5:46 PM AdminNosy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024