Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How the geo strata are identified as time periods
pesto
Member (Idle past 5618 days)
Posts: 63
From: Chicago, IL
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 93 of 101 (348880)
09-13-2006 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Minnemooseus
09-07-2006 7:30 PM


Re: Basalt not a radiometricly datable volcanic
In terms of dating geologic age, basalt is an excellent marker. Using Potasium 40 or Argon dating will get you a fairly accurate date of a volcanic event.
Some volcanic horizons are indeed very useful for radiometricly dating, and for the dating of sediments between volcanic horizons. But basalt, the mafic (high iron and magnesium) end member of the types of igneous rocks is (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) not radiomentrically datable by the common methods, including such as Potasium/Argon, Uranium/Lead, and variations there of. Basalt is very low in Potasium and Uranium.
One thing I don't understand is how we know the original ratios of these elements in volcanic rocks. I understand carbon dating, because of how nitrogen is turned into carbon-14 in the upper atmosphere, but what about the other radioisotopes used to date older strata?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Minnemooseus, posted 09-07-2006 7:30 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by AdminNosy, posted 09-13-2006 5:36 PM pesto has not replied
 Message 95 by Coragyps, posted 09-13-2006 5:38 PM pesto has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024