Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,880 Year: 4,137/9,624 Month: 1,008/974 Week: 335/286 Day: 56/40 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why prefer the Biblical creation account over those of other religions?
archaeologist
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 146 (575008)
08-18-2010 5:27 PM


Let’s say for the sake of argument, Evidence is found that proves Darwin wrong. How do you know that the Biblical account of creation is the true story, and not the accounts told by the Shinto and Hindus (Both of which are living faiths) for example?
if you are still on the board, i would like to see links please.
oh and darwin was proven wrong long ago.
But that would need to involve presenting creation science claims and then examining and discussing them. Which would necessarily include why they are so incredibly false.
and whatis wrong with that? if evolution were true, you should not have to worry about it being taught for it would easily be refuted, but as it stands it is evolution which is easily refuted.
The Bible has no issues with evolution
good thin you are not a translator for you would be wrong. Gen. 1:30 puts evolution in its place, it does not exist.
and it is not '6 periods' they were 6 actual 24 hour days as the usage of the 'evning and morning' clarify the time frame.
the stars and sun existed before the earth
this would be wrong.
science doesn't know what it is talking about when it comes to origins.
Where is the historical evidence?
read Gary habermas' The Historical Jesus

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by bluescat48, posted 08-18-2010 11:16 PM archaeologist has replied
 Message 19 by Larni, posted 08-19-2010 5:57 PM archaeologist has not replied

  
archaeologist
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 146 (575365)
08-19-2010 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by bluescat48
08-18-2010 11:16 PM


cherry picking/

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by bluescat48, posted 08-18-2010 11:16 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Coragyps, posted 08-19-2010 6:38 PM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 21 by bluescat48, posted 08-19-2010 6:55 PM archaeologist has not replied

  
archaeologist
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 146 (575647)
08-20-2010 5:10 PM


you people never even consider the fact that the devil has initiated false religions that somewhat copy what takes place against and inside christianity,inorder to confuse those who reject the truth.
when moses and aaron were before the pharaoh, aaron throws down his staff and it bcomes a snake...like wise so do the magicians of pharaoh's court. yet that is as far as the copying could go for aaron's snake ate the others showing its superiority.
Ex. 7:8-13.
so there are false religions out there that get persecuted, back in the 1800's the north american indians used to promote a spiritual dance that was outlawed by the u.s. gov. people inpower do strange things whenthey think something is going to be subversive to their rule.
muslims are being tortured for their terrorism activities, christianity doesn't have a monopoly on being persecuted.
one chooses the biblical accounts over all the rest because it is the only true ones out there and they do so by FAITH. that is the key to the equation. secularists only look for physical evidence but that physical evidence is limited and faith is always going to be the key.
no other way to put it.

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by jar, posted 08-20-2010 5:19 PM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 25 by ringo, posted 08-20-2010 5:20 PM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 26 by bluescat48, posted 08-20-2010 6:12 PM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 27 by Nij, posted 08-20-2010 11:03 PM archaeologist has replied

  
archaeologist
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 146 (575791)
08-21-2010 3:26 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Nij
08-20-2010 11:03 PM


Re: Tu quoque (one that isn't fallacious)
#1 i am not a troll. just because you do not get the answers you want to hear doesn't mean i am a troll but that is a label you use to get rid of the truth.
#2
And you people never seem to consider the facts
we always consider the facts, they just over-rule secular science's rules.
that your entire religion is based on a book with only tangential connection to history, and largely full of myth;
first off, you cannot prove it to be a myth, you just want it to be one. people have been saying this for millenia and not one of them has ever produce the evidence that demonstrates that false accusation as fact. if it were a myth, then there would be real evidence and we would not be having this discussion.
that when those myths are tested by rational people including a huge number of people who believe the same book just as much as you do they are invariably found to be untrue regardless of what prejudice may have been involved;
how can you test historical events? they are gone, done, over with? any event repeating those events today are false for they are not the true events and lack the orignal conditions toproduce them thus any finding against them would be false.
that when presented with these findings, your first response is to judge and exhort everybody for bias, dishonesty and "being tricked by Satan" in spite of your precious book telling you not to do these things; and
actually i can say those things. you need to hear the truth and if i do not say how will you hear it?
without ever presenting your evidence beyond "Bible says this" to reject any of the data provided.
i have presented evidence over and over but it is dismissed and not even discussed or considered. read through the threads i participate in. you will see the secularists change the subject so fast that it doesn't matter what i do. you all do not want to hear the truth.
I'll stick with you being irrational and inconsistent.
yet i am neither. what is more irrational: accepting a theory that has never been observed, constructed by humans and made famous by another one,. all it relies upon are assumptions, conjecture, speculations, hypothesis and which offers no hope, no love, no caring, no help, no security OR choosing to accept a elief that has been observed, recorded from ancient times, started by God who is the most powerful Being around, who loves, cares, protects, and offers security and so on?
if you say the former then you are being very irrational and ignore your own needs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Nij, posted 08-20-2010 11:03 PM Nij has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Nij, posted 08-21-2010 4:34 AM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 31 by jar, posted 08-21-2010 9:59 AM archaeologist has not replied

  
archaeologist
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 146 (576423)
08-24-2010 4:41 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Larni
08-21-2010 12:44 PM


Re: To everybody else...
there is no reason to hang out in this forum or website to long. the secularists are very dishonest, think they are an authority when they are not, and practice deceitful discussion tactics.
they lie about the flood and other biblical events as being discredited or proven wrong and close their minds to the truth so it becmes pointless to discuss here with anyone, even theminute few good posters as the discussion is often interuppted by the moronic who just do not have a clue.
NOW in answer to the thread question: we prefer the Biblical account over other religion's simply because it is the truth. all other accounts are distorted copies fromthe biblical ones and reflect the religious mindset of the people who created them as they drew further and further away from God and the truth as led by satan and his minions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Larni, posted 08-21-2010 12:44 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Nij, posted 08-24-2010 8:42 AM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 35 by jar, posted 08-24-2010 10:40 AM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 36 by bluescat48, posted 08-24-2010 11:12 AM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 37 by Larni, posted 08-24-2010 11:12 AM archaeologist has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024