Well, now you're just making mistakes about biology almost at random.
In some cases you don't even bother making the mistake, you merely allude to it. In what way would you like to be wrong about
Archaeopteryx? You just indicate in passing that there's some sort of mistake you want to make.
As for the rest of it ... sheesh. You're wrong about finches, you're wrong about irreducible complexity ... and how can
anyone not know that there are things other than birds which migrate? This presents us once more with the strangest paradox of creationism --- that creationists are
obsessed with a subject, biology, that they aren't remotely
interested in.
We must remember that this comes from the guy who confidently assured us that tetanus was not caused by bacteria. Did it never occur to you to find out about the things you're talking about before talking about them? It might prevent you from saying things that are hopelessly wrong.